Governing under advanced liberalism: Sport policy and the social investment state

Policy Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 55-71

  Green, Mick ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Advanced liberalism; New Labour; Social investment state; Sport and physical activity policy

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENT; LABOR POLICY; LIBERALISM; SOCIAL POLICY; SPORT; WELFARE PROVISION;

EID: 34247208649     PISSN: 00322687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-007-9034-y     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bache, I. (2003). Governing through governance: Education policy control under new labour. Political Studies, 51, 300-314.
2. Blair, T. (1995). The rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe, spectator lecture. London: Labour Party.
3. Blair, T. (1999). Beveridge lecture. London: Toynbee Hall, 18 March.
4. Brown, G. (2006). Chancellor of the exchequer budget statement. Accessed on 23 March 2006 at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/budget/budget_06/ bud_bud06_speech.cfm.
5. Collins, M. F. with Kay, T. (2003). Sport and social exclusion. London: Routledge.
6. Commission on Social Justice. (1994). Social justice: Strategies for national renewal, Report of the Commission on Social Justice, London: Vintage.
7. Craig, G. (2004). Citizenship, exclusion and older people. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 95-114.
8. Daly, M. (2003). Governance and social policy. Journal of Social Policy, 32, 113-128.
9. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
10. Dean M., & Hindess B., (Eds.), (1998). Governing Australia: Studies in contemporary rationalities of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2000). A sporting future for all. London: DCMS.
12. Department for Culture, Media and Sport/Strategy Unit. (2002). Game Plan: A strategy for delivering government's sport and physical activity objectives. London: DCMS/Strategy Unit.
13. Department for Education and Skills. (2003). Every child matters (Cm 5860). London: The Stationery Office.
14. Department for Education and Skills. (2004). Every child matters: Change for children. London: The Stationery Office.
15. Department for Education and Skills/Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2003). Learning through PE and sport: A guide to the physical education, school sport and club links strategy. London: DfES/DCMS.
16. Department of the Environment. (1975). Sport and recreation. London: HMSO.
17. Department of Health. (2002). Health check: On the state of public health, Annual report of the Chief Medical Officer, London: DoH.
18. Department of Health. (2004). At least five a week: Evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health, A Report from the Chief Medical Officer. London: DoH.
19. Dobrowolsky, A. (2002). Rhetoric versus reality: The figure of the child and New Labour's strategic 'social investment state'. Studies in Political Economy, 69, 43-74.
20. Dobrowolsky, A. (2003). Social Investment State/Civil Society Interactionism: New Forms of Governance in Britain, (Working Paper # 10). Accessed 21 February 2006 at http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/pol/ cohesionsociale/publications/workingpapers/collnotesderecherche/ 10%20dobrowolksky.pdf.
21. Dobrowolsky, A., & Jenson, J. (2005). Social investment perspectives and practices: A decade in British politics. In M. Powell, L. Bauld, & K. Clarke (Eds.), Social policy review 17: Analysis and debate in social policy 2005 (pp. 203-230). University of Bristol: The Policy Press.
22. Dwyer, P. (1998). Conditional citizens? Welfare rights and responsibilities in the late 1990s. Critical Social Policy, 57, 493-517.
23. Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A., & Myles, J. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Featherstone, B. (2006). Rethinking family support in the current policy context. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 5-19.
25. Finlayson, A. (2003). Making sense of New Labour. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
26. Finlayson, A., & Martin, J. (2006). Poststructuralism. In C. Hay, M. Lister, & D. Marsh (Eds.), The state: Theories and issues (pp. 155-171). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
27. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Brighton: Harvester.
28. Frankel, B. (1997). Confronting neo-liberal regimes: The post-marxist embrace of populism and realpolitik. New Left Review, 226, 57-92.
29. Giddens, A. (1995). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30. Giddens, A. (1998a). Equality and the social investment state. In I. Hargreaves & I. Christie (Eds.), Tomorrow's politics: The third way and beyond (pp. 25-38). London: Demos.
31. Giddens, A. (1998b). The third way - The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32. Green, M. (2004). Changing policy priorities for sport in England: The emergence of elite sport development as a key policy concern. Leisure Studies, 23, 365-385.
33. Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2005). Elite sport development: Policy learning and political priorities. London: Routledge.
34. Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2006). Governmentality, modernisation and the 'disciplining' of national sporting organisations: Athletics in Australia and the United Kingdom. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23, 47-71.
35. Hall, S. (1998). The great moving nowhere show, Marxism Today November: 9-14.
36. Halpin, T. (2006). Evening classes to double charges, The Times, 28 March: 1-2.
37. Henry, I. P. (2001). The politics of leisure policy (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
38. HM Treasury. (2006). Budget 2006 (HC 968). London: The Stationery Office.
39. Houlihan, B., & Green, M. (2006). The changing status of school sport and physical education: Explaining policy change. Sport, Education and Society, 11, 73-92.
40. Jenson, J. (2005). Social investment for new social risks: Consequences of the LEGO TM Paradigm for Children. Accessed on 9 March 2006 at http://www.cccg.umontreal.ca/pdf/Social%20investment%20Jane%20Jenson.pdf.
41. Jenson, J., & Saint-Martin, D. (2003). New routes to social cohesion? Citizenship and the social investment state. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28, 77-99.
42. Jenson, J., & Saint-Martin, D. (2006). Building blocks for a new social architecture: The LEGO TM Paradigm of an Active Society. Policy and Politics, 34, 429-451.
43. Kay, W. (2003). Physical education, RIP? British Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 34, 6-9.
44. Lister, R. (2003). Investing in the citizen-workers of the future: Transformations in citizenship and the state under New Labour. Social Policy and Administration, 37, 427-443.
45. Lister, R. (2004). The third way's social investment state. In J. Lewis, & R. Surender (Eds.), Welfare state change: Towards a third way ? (pp. 157-181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. MacPhail, A., Kirk, D., & Eley, D. (2003). Listening to young people's voices: Youth sports leaders' advice on facilitating participation in sport. European Physical Education Review, 9, 57-73.
47. McDonald, I. (2005). Theorising partnerships: Governance, communicative action and sport policy. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 579-600.
48. McIntosh, P., & Charlton, V. (1985). The impact of sport for all policy 1966-1984 and a way forward. London: Sports Council.
49. Newman, J. (2001). Modernising governance: New Labour, policy and society. London: Sage.
50. Newman, J. (2004). Modernising the state: A new style of governance? In J. Lewis, & R. Surender (Eds.), Welfare state change: Towards a third way? (pp. 69-88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Newman, J., & McKee, B. (2005). Beyond the new public management? public services and the social investment state. Policy and Politics, 33, 657-674.
52. Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Raco, M. (2004). Whose gold rush? The social legacy of a London Olympics. In A. Vigor, M. Mean, & C. Tims (Eds.), After the gold rush: A sustainable Olympics for London (pp. 33-49). London: Institute for Public Policy and Research/Demos.
54. Raco, M., & Imrie, R. (2000). Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy. Environment and Planning, 32, 2187-2204.
55. Riddell, M. (2006). Happiness, the one thing we deny them, The Observer, 19 March: 31.
56. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43, 172-205.
58. Social Exclusion Unit. (2005). Transitions: Young adults with complex needs. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
59. Sport England. (2006a). Sport playing its part: The contribution of sport to healthier communities. London: Sport England.
60. Sport England. (2006b). Sport playing its part: The contribution of sport to meeting the needs of children and young people. London: Sport England.
61. Sport England. (2006c). Sport playing its part: Executive summary. London: Sport England.
62. Sports Council. (1982). Sport in the community: The next ten years. London: Sports Council.
63. Watson, S. (2000). Foucault and the study of social policy. In G. Lewis, S. Gewirtz, & J. Clarke (Eds.), Rethinking social policy (pp. 66-77). London: Sage.