Evidence-based medicine: methods and critics;Evidence-based medicine : méthodes et critiques

Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 334-343

  Bizouarn, P ^a  

^a CHU de Nantes   (France)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Evidence; Evidence Based Medicine; Guidelines

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL PRACTICE;

ANESTHESIA; DECISION TREES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;

EID: 34247208227     PISSN: 07507658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2006.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-Based Medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of Medicine. JAMA 268 (1992) 2420-2425
2. Haynes R.B., Sackett D.L., Gray J.M.A., Cook D.J., and Guyatt G.H. De la recherche aux pratiques: 1. Rôle des preuves issues de la recherche dans les décisions cliniques. EBMJournal 7 (1997) 4-6 (édition française)
3. Cochrane A.L. Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services (1972), Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London
4. Goodman K.W. Ethics and Evidence-Based Medicine. Fallibility and responsibility in clinical science (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Sackett D.L. Evidence-Based Medicine. How to practice and teach EBM? (2000), Churchill Livingstone, London
6. Guyatt G.H. User's guide to the medical literature. XXV. Evidence-Based Medicine : principles for applying the user's guide to patient care. JAMA 284 (2000) 1290-1296
7. Boissel J.P. L'information thérapeutique (2000), Masson, Paris 205-226
8. Gray M.J.A., Haynes R.B., Sackett D.L., Cook D.J., and Guyatt G.H. De la recherche auxpratiques : élaborer les stratégies cliniques basées sur les faits prouvés. EBM Journal 9 (1998) 5-7 (édition française)
9. Les recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Base méthodologique pour leur réalisation en France (1999), Anaes
10. Glasziou P., Guyatt G.H., Dans A.L., Straus S., and Sackett D.L. Applying the results of trialsand systematic reviews to individual patients. ACP J. Club (1998) A15-A16
11. Glasziou P., Guyatt G.H., Dans A.L., Straus S., and Sackett D.L. Comment appliquer lesrésultats des essais cliniques et des revues systématiques au cas particulier d'un patientdonné. EBM Journal 19 (1999) 5-7 (édition française)
12. McAllister F.A. User's guides to the medical literature. XX. Integrating researchevidence with the care of the individual patient. JAMA 283 (2000) 2829-2836
13. Fritsche L., Greenhalg T., Falck-Ytter Y., Neumayer H.H., and Kunz R. Do short courses in evidence based medicine improve knowledge and skills? Validation of Berlin questionnaire and before and after study of courses in evidence based medicine. BMJ 7 (2002) 1338-1341
14. Marks H. La médecine des preuves. Histoire et anthropologie des essais cliniques [1900-1990] (1999), Les empêcheurs de Penser en Rond, Paris
15. e Congrès national d'anesthésieet de réanimation (2000), Elsevier, Paris 319-322
16. Moller A.M., Smith A.F., and Pedersen T. Evidence-based medicine and the Cochrane Collaboration in anaesthesia. Br. J. Anaesth. 84 (2000) 655-658
17. Myles P.S., Bain D.L., Johnson F., and McMahon R. Is anaesthesia evidence-based? A survey of anaesthetic practice. Br. J. Anaesth. 82 (1999) 591-595
18. Sackett D.L., and Haynes R.B. De la nécessité d'une médecine basée sur des faits prouvés. EBM Journal 1 (1996) 5-6 (édition française)
19. Midy F., and Picard H. Rationalité et décision médicale. In: Béjean S., and Peyron C. (Eds). Santé, règles et rationalité (2002), Economica, Paris
20. Feinstein A.R., and Horwitz R.I. Problems in the evidence of Evidence-Based Medicine. Am. J. Med. 103 (1997) 529-535
21. Geddes J., and Goodwin G. Bipolar disorder: clinical uncertainty, evidence-based medicine and large-scale randomised trials. Br. J. Psychiatry 178 suppl.41 (2001) s191-s194
22. Naylor C.D. Grey-zones of clinical practice: some limits of evidence-based medicine. Lancet 34 5 (1995) 840-842
23. March J.S., Silva S.G., Compton S., Shapiro M., Califf R., and Krishnan R. The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiatry 162 (2005) 836-846
24. Guyatt G.H., Meade M.O., Jaeschke R.Z., Cook D.J., and Haynes R.B. Practitioners of evidencebased care. Not all clinicians need to appraise evidence from scratch but all need some skills. BMJ 320 (2000) 954-955
25. Ballantyne J.C., Kupelnick B., McPeek B., and Lau J. Does the evidence support the use of spinal and epidural anesthesia for surgery. J. Clin. Anesth. 17 (2005) 382-391
26. Rodgers A., Walker N., Schug S., McKee A., Kehlet H., van Zundert A., et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 321 (2000) 1493
27. Park W.Y., Thompson J.S., and Lee K.K. Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomised, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Ann. Surg. 234 (2001) 560-571
28. Rigg J.R., Jamrozik K., Myles P.S., Silbert B.S., Peyton P.J., Parsons R.W., et al. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet 359 (2002) 1276-1282
29. Van Aken H. Regional anesthesia for the cardiac risk patient: pro's and con's. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 42 Suppl 112 (1998) 156-159
30. Elia N., and Tramèr M.R. Ketamine and postoperative pain- a quantitative systematic review of randomised trials. Pain 113 (2005) 61-70
31. Pedersen T., Dyrlund B., and Moller A.M. Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring (Cochrane Review) (2003), Cochrane Library (Issue 1)
32. Jüni P., Witschi A., Bloch R., and Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 282 (1999) 1054-1060
33. Altman D.G., Schulz K.F., Moher D., Egger M., Davidoff F., Elbourne D., et al., for the CONSORT Group. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 134 (2001) 663-694
34. Upshur R.E.G. Are all evidence-based practices alike? Problems in the ranking of evidence. JAMC 169 (2003) 672-673
35. Glasziou P., Vandenbroucke J., and Chalmers I. Assessing the quality of research. BMJ 328 (2004) 39-41
36. Atkins D., Eccles M., Flottorp S., Guyatt G.H., Henry D., Hill S., et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. BMC Health Serv. Res. 4 (2004) 38
37. Atkins D., Briss P.A., Eccles M., Flottrop S., Guyatt G.H., Harbour R.T., et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv. Res. 5 (2005) 25
38. Guyatt G., Vist G., Falck-Ytter Y., Kunz R., Magrini N., and Schunemann H. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations?. ACP J. Club 144 (2006) A8-A9
39. GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328 (2004) 1418-1490
40. o 398.
41. Berkwits M. From practice to research: the case for criticism in an age of evidence. Soc. Sci. Med. 74 (1998) 1539-1545
42. Norheim O.F. Healthcare rationing -are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based practice guidelines?. BMJ 319 (1999) 1426-1429