Improving the quality of UML models in practice

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 993-996

  Lange, Christian F J ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Completeness; Consistency; Defect detection; Quality; UML

Indexed keywords

DEFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; VISUALIZATION;

DEFECT REMOVAL; QUALITY MODELS; UML; UML DEFECTS;

MARKUP LANGUAGES;

EID: 34247172605     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1134285.1134472     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. The Precise UML Group. http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/puml/.
2. S. W. Ambler. The Elements of UML Style. Ronin International, 2003.
3. B. Boehm. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, London, 1981.
4. M. E. Fagan. Advances in software inspections. IEEE Tr. on Software Engineering, 12(7):744-751, 1986.
5. A. C. W. Finkelstein, D. Gabbay, A. Hunter, J. Kramer, and B. Nuseibeh. Inconsistency handling in multi-perspective specifications. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(8):569-578, August 1994.
6. T. Gilb and D. Graham. Software Inspection. Addison Wesley Publishing Co., 1993.
7. ISO/IED FCD 9126-1.2. Information Technology -Software Product Quality, part i: quality model edition, 1998.
8. J. M. Küster. Consistency Management of Object-Oriented Behavioral Models. Phd thesis, Universität Paderborn, Paderborn, March 2004.
9. L. Kuzniarz, Z. Huzar, G. Reggio, J.-L. Sourrouille, and M. Staron. 2nd Workshop on Consistency Problems in UML-based Software Development at the UML2003. Blekinge Institute of Technology, 2003.
10. O. Laitenberger and J.-M. DeBaud. An encompassing life-cycle centric survey of software inspection. Journal of Systems and Software, 2000.
11. C. F. J. Lange and M. R. V. Chaudron. An empirical assessment of completeness in UML designs. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE'04), Pages 111-121, 2004.
12. C. F. J. Lange and M. R. V. Chaudron. Combining metrics data and the structure of UML models using GIS visualization approaches. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Technology 2005, volume 2, pages 322-326, April 2005.
13. C. F. J. Lange and M. R. V. Chaudron. Managing model quality in UML-based software development. In Preproceedings of STEP05, 2005.
14. C. F. J. Lange and M. R. V. Chaudron. Effects of defects in UML models - an experimental investigation. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'06). ACM, May 2006.
15. C. F. J. Lange, M. R. V. Chaudron, and J. Muskens. In practice: UML software architecture and design description. IEEE Software, 23(2), March 2006.
16. F. Leung and N. Bolloju. Analyzing the quality of domain models developed by novice systems analysts. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. IEEE, 2005.
17. O. I. Lindland, G. Sindre, and A. Sølvberg. Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software, 11(2):42-49, March 1994.
18. Object Management Group. MDA Guide, Version 1.0.1, omg/03-06-01 edition, June 2003.
19. Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language, Adopted Final Specification, Version 2.0, ptc/03-09-15 edition, December 2003.
20. M. A. Termeer, C. F. J. Lange, A. Telea, and M. R. V. Chaudron. Visual exploration of combined architectural and metric information. In Proceedings of VISSOFT'05. IEEE CS Press, 2005.
21. R. van der Straeten. Inconsistentiebeheer in modelgebaseerde ontwikkeling. Phd thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium, 2005.