A density functional study of the electronic structure and spin hamiltonian parameters of mononuclear thiomolybdenyl complexes

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 2388-2397

  Drew, Simon C ^a   Young, Charles G ^b   Hanson, Graeme R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLYBDENUM; THIOL DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

ELECTRONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MOLYBDENUM; SULFHYDRYL COMPOUNDS;

EID: 34247168003     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic060586b     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Neese, F. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 125.
2. Kaupp, M., Bühl, M., Malkin, V.G., Eds. Calculation of NMR and EPR Parameters, Theory and Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004.
3. Cosper, M. M.; Neese, F.; Astashkin, A. V.; Carducci, M. D.; Raitsimring, A. M.; Enemark, I. H. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1290.
4. Drew, S. C.; Hill, J. P.; Lane, I.; Hanson, G. R.; Gable, R. W.; Young, C. G. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 2373.
5. Neese, F. ORCA An ab initio, DFT and Semiempirical Electronic Structure Package, version 2.4, revision 26; Max-Planck Institut für Bioanorganische Chemie: Mulheim, Germany, 2004.
6. 2 the propyl group attached to C(42) were found to be disordered. We arbitrarily used a single conformation of these complexes, with the expectation that disorder of this group is of little consequence to the SH parameters in comparison with the orientation of the six-membered ring to which it is attached. The structure of Tp*MoS(bdt) showed evidence of minor disorder. We used the structure with the occupancy factor of 0.975. The structure of Tp*MoS(cat) was also found to be disordered, and once again, we used the structure of the major component with occupancy factor 0.517. Hydrogen atoms for this complex were also added at standard bond angles and lengths.
7. Basu, P.; Bruck, M. A.; Li, Z.; Dhawan, I. K.; Enemark, J. H. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 405.
8. Dhawan, I. K.; Enemark, J. H. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 4873.
9. Keijzers, C. P.; de Boer, E. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 57, 1277.
10. Belanzoni, P.; Baerends, E. J.; van Asselt, S.; Langewen, P. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 13094.
11. Neese, F. J. Chem. Phys. A 2001, 105, 4290.
12. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098.
13. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822.
14. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
15. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
16. van Lenthe, E.; Baerends, E. J.; Snijders, J. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 4597.
17. van Lenthe, E.; Baerends, E. J.; Snijders, J. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 6505.
18. van Lenthe, E.; van der Avoird, A.; Wormer, P. E. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 4783.
19. van Wüllen, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 392.
20. Ahlrichs, R.; May, K. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 943.
21. Schäfer, A.; Horn, H.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571.
22. Schäfer, A.; Huber, C.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5829.
23. Eichkorn, K.; Treutler, O.; Ohm, H.; Haser, M.; Ahlrichs, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 240, 283.
24. Eichkorn, K.; Weigend, F.; Treutler, O.; Ahlrichs, R. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1997, 97, 119. The Mo atom used an uncontracted basis constructed "by inspection" in the ORCA program.
25. The SpecialGridIntAcc parameter in ORCA was set to 14, 7, 5, and 5 for the Mo, S, N, and O atoms, respectively.
26. Neese, F. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 034107.
27. Neese, F. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 11080.
28. Neese, F. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 3939.
29. Baute, D.; Arieli, D.; Neese, F.; Zimmermann, H.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Goldfarb, D. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11733, Supporting Information.
30. Jensen, F. Introduction to Computational Chemistry; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, U.K., 2002; Chapter 10.5.
31. McWeeney, R.; Sutcliffe, B. T. Methods of Molecular Quantum Mechanics; Academic Press: London, U.K., 1969.
32. Pulay, P.; Hamilton, T. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 4926.
33. Bofill, J. M.; Pulay, P. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 3637.
34. Schöneboon, J. C.; Neese, F.; Thiel, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5840, Supporting Infomation.
35. Neese, F. Private communication.
36. The QRMO approach is suitable for pure functionals. The GGA virtual orbital energies, unlike those from Hartree-Fock and hybrid calculations (whose orbitals "see" N instead of N - 1 electrons), represent adequate zeroth-order approximations to the excitation energies and are thus suitable for inclusion in eq 4.
37. Inscore, F. E.; McNaughton, R.; Westcott, B. L.; Helton, M. E.; Jones, R.; Dhawan, I. K.; Enemark, J. H.; Kirk, M. L. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 1401.
38. Joshi, H. K.; Cooney, J. J. A.; Inscore, F. E.; Gruhn, N. E.; Lichtenberger, D. L.; Enemark, J. H. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 3719.
39. gOpenMol for Linux, v. 2.32, http://www.csc.fi/gopenmol/, 2003.
40. Huzinaga, S.; Miguel, B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 175, 289.
41. Huzinaga, S.; Klobukowski, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 212, 260.
42. Domercq, B.; Coulon, C.; Fourmigué, M. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 371.
43. Joshi, H. K.; Enemark, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11784.
44. Klamt, A.; Schüürmann, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 799.