Lawmaking and roll calls

Journal of Politics

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 457-469

  Clinton, Joshua D ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247167485     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00543.x     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Achen, Christopher H. 1983. "Toward Theories of Data: The State of Political Methodology." In Political Sceince: The State of the Discipline, ed. Ada W. Finifter. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, pp. 69-93.
2. Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bafumi, Joseph, Andrew Gelman, David K. Park, and Noah Kaplan. 2005. "Practical Issues in Implementing and Understanding Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation." Political Analysis 13 (2): 171-87.
4. Bailey, Michael. 2005. "Bridging Institutions and Time: Creating Comparable Preference Estimates for Presidents, Senators, Representatives and Justices, 1950-2002." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.
5. Binder, Sarah. 1999. "The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-1996." American Political Science Review 93 (3): 519-33.
6. Brady, David W., and Craig Volden. 1998. Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to Clinton, Second Edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7. Cameron, Charles. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power, New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Chiou, Fang-Yi, and Lawrence S. Rothenberg. 2003. "When Pivotal Politics Meets Partisan Politics." American Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 503-22.
9. Clinton, Joshua D. 2006. "Representation in Congress: Constituents and Roll Calls in the 106th House." Journal of Politics 68 (2): 397-409.
10. Clinton, Joshua D., and Adam Meirowitz. 2003. "Integrating Voting Theory and Roll Call Analysis: A Framework." Political Analysis 11 (3): 381-96.
11. Clinton, Joshua D., and Adam Meirowitz. 2004. "Testing Accounts of Legislative Strategic Voting: The Compromise of 1790." American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 675-89.
12. Clinton, Joshua D., Simon Jackman, and Douglas Rivers. 2004. "The Statistical Analysis of Legislative Behavior: A Unified Approach." American Political Science Review 98 (2): 355-70.
13. Coleman, John J. 1999. "Unifed Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness." American Political Science Review 93 (4): 821-35.
14. Covington, Cary R., and Andrew A. Bargen. 2004. "Comparing Floor-Dominated and Party-Dominated Explanations of Policy Change in the House of Representatives." Journal of Politics 66 (4): 1069-1087.
15. Cox, Gary W. 2001. "Agenda Setting in the U.S. House: A MajorityParty Monopoly?" Legislative Studies Quarterly XXVI (2): 185210.
16. Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002. "Agenda Power in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1877-1986." In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress, eds. David W. Brady and Mathew D. McCubbins. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 107-45.
18. Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives, New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Cox, Gary W., and Keith T. Poole. 2002. "On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1887-1999." American Journal Of Political Science 46 (3): 477-89.
20. Crombez, Cristophe, Tim Groseclose, and Keith Krehbiel. 2006. "Gatekeeping." Journal of Politics 68 (2): 322-34.
21. Denzau, Arthur T., and Robert J. Mackay. 1983. "Gatekeeping and Monopoly Power of Committees: An Analysis of Sincere and Strategic Behavior." American Journal of Political Science 27 (4): 740-61.
22. Dion, Dougles, and John D. Huber. 1996. "Procedural Chorce and The House Committee on Rubes." Journal of Politics 58 (1): 25-53.
23. Epstein, David, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers, New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Greene, William H. 2003. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25. Groseclose, Tim, and James M. Snyder Jr. 2000. "Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting." American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 193-211.
26. Jackman, Simon. 2004. Ideal: Ideal Point Estimation and Roll Call Analysis via Bayesian Simulation, v. 0.5, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
27. Katznelson, Ira, and John S. Lapinski. 2006. "Studying Policy Content and Legislative Behavior." In Macropolitics of Congress, eds. E. Scott Adler and John S. Lapinski. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28. Kramer, Gerald. 1986. "Political Science as Science." In Political Science: The Science of Politics, ed. Herbert Weisberg. New York: Agathon Press.
29. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. "Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship." American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 212-27.
31. Krehbiel, Keith, and Alan Wiseman. 2001. "Joseph G. Cannon: Majoritarian from Illinois." Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (3): 357-90.
32. Krehbiel, Keith, and Jonathan Woon. 2005. "Selection Criteria for Roll Call Votes." Typescript. Stanford University.
33. Krehbiel, Keith, Adam Meirowitz, and Jonathan Woon. 2005. "Testing Theories of Lawmaking." In Social Choice and Strategic Decisions: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey S. Banks, eds. David AustenSmith and John Duggan. New York: Springer.
34. Lawrence, Eric D., Forest Maltzman, and Steven S. Smith. 2006. "Who Wins? Party Effects in Legislative Voting." Legislative Studies Quarterly XXXI (1): 33-70.
35. Lewis, Jeffrey B., and Keith T. Poole. 2004. "Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap." Political Analysis 12 (2): 105-27.
36. Londregan, John. 2000. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile, New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Martin, Andrew D. 2001. "Congressional Decision Making and the Separation of Powers." American Political Science Review 95 (2): 361-78.
38. McCarty, Nolan M., and Keith T. Poole. 1995. "Veto Power and Legislation: An Empirical Analysis of Executive and Legislative Bargaining from 1961 to 1986." Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 11 (3): 282-312.
39. McCarty, Nolan M., Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2001. "The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress." American Political Science Review 95: 673-87.
40. Poole, Keith T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Rivers, Douglas. 2003. "Identification of Multidimensional Spatial Voting Models." Typescript. Stanford University.
42. Rohde, David W. 2004. "Roll Call Voting Data for the United States House of Representatives, 1953-2004." Compiled by the Political Institutions and Public Choice Program, Michigan State University.
43. Rothenberg, Lawrence S., and Mitchell S. Sanders. 2000. "Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress." American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 316-25.
44. Schickler, Eric. 2000. "Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867-1998: A Test of Partisan and Ideological Power Balance Models." American Political Science Review 94 (2): 269-88.
45. Schulz, Heiner, and Thomas Konig. 2000. "Institutional Reform and Decision-Making in the European Union." American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 653-65.
46. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. "Separation-of-Powers in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts." American Political Science Review 91 (1): 28-44.
47. Shepsle, Kenneth. 1979. "Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models." American Journal of Political Science 23 (1): 27-59.
48. Shepsle, Kenneth, and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. "The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power." American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85-104.
49. Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast. 1994. "Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions." Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (2): 149-79.
50. Smith, Steven S. 2000. "Positive Theories of Congressional Parties." Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (2): 193-215.
51. Smith, Steven S., and Jason M. Roberts. 2003. "Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971-2000." American Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 305-17.
52. Snyder, James M. Jr. 1992. "Committee Power, Structural-Induced Equilibria, and Roll Call Votes." American Journal of Political Science 36(1): 1-30.
53. Snyder, James M., Jr., and Michael M. Ting. 2003. "Roll Calls, Party Labels and Elections." Political Analysis 11 (4): 419-33.
54. Wawro, Gregory J., and Eric Schickler. 2004. "Where's the Pivot? Obstruction and Lawmaking in the Pre-Cloture Senate." American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 758-74.