Statistical modelling of ultrasonic sensors in process industries - New prospects for conventional devices

Measurement Science and Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1627-1636

  Schäfer, Robert ^a   Hauptmann, Peter ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Density measurement; Statistical modelling; Ultrasonics

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DENSITY MEASUREMENT (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); ETHANOL; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; METHANOL; STATISTICAL METHODS;

MODEL COMPLEXITY; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT REGRESSION; STATISTICAL MODELING;

ULTRASONIC SENSORS;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DENSITY MEASUREMENT (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); ETHANOL; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; METHANOL; STATISTICAL METHODS; ULTRASONIC SENSORS;

EID: 34247146474     PISSN: 09570233     EISSN: 13616501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/18/5/055     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hauptmann P, Hoppe N and Püttmer A 2002 Application of ultrasonic sensors in the process industry Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 R73-83
2. Ondrey G 2003 Use ultrasound to measure flow and concentration, simultaneously Chem. Eng. (October) 19
3. Piché L 1984 Ultrasonic velocity measurement for the determination of density in polyethylene Polym. Eng. Sci. 24 1354-8
4. Morse P M and Ingard K U 1968 Theoretical Acoustics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press) pp 278-9
5. Alig I, Fischer D, Lellinger D and Steinhoff D 2005 Combination of NIR, Raman, ultrasonic and dielectric spectroscopy for in-line monitoring of the extrusion process Macromol. Symp. 230 51-8
6. utilov V A 1984 Physik des Ultraschalls ed P Hauptmann (Berlin: Akademie) pp 60-8
7. Pierre A C 1998 Introduction to Sol-Gel-Processing (Boston, MA: Kluwer) pp 186-8
8. Delsing J 1993 Method and apparatus for measuring mass flow US Patent 5214966
9. Püttmer A and Hauptmann P 1998 Ultrasonic density sensor-analysis of errors due to surface deposits Eurosensors XII (Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing) pp 101-4
10. Hoppe N 2003 Ultraschall-Dichtesensor, Entwurf, Charakterisierung und Signalverarbeitung (Aachen: Shaker) pp 29-53
11. Deventer J A v 2001 Material Investigations and Simulation Tools towards a Design Strategy for an Ultrasonic Densitometer (Lule, Sweden: Lule University of Technology) pp 9-24
12. Püttmer A, Hauptmann P and Henning B 2000 Ultrasonic density sensor for liquids IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 47 85-92
13. Arnau A (ed) 2004 Piezoelectric Transducers and Applications (Berlin: Springer) pp 55-67
14. Krimholtz R, Leedom D A and Matthaei G L 1970 New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers Electron. Lett. 6 398-9
15. Grennberg A and Sandell M 1994 Estimation of subsample time delay differences in narrowbandultrasonic echoes using the Hilbert transform correlation IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 41 588-95
16. Chatterjee S, Hadi A S and Price B 2000 Regression Analysis by Example 3rd edn (New York: Wiley) p 13
17. Brown P 1993 Measurement, Regression, and Calibration (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 33-8
18. Joliffe I T 2002 Principal Component Analysis 2nd edn (New York: Springer) pp 167-98
19. Wold S, Martens H and Wold H 1983 The multivariate calibration problem in chemistry solved by the PLS method Lecture Notes in Mathematics: Matrix Pencils ed A Ruhe and B Kägström (Heidelberg: Springer) pp 286-93
20. Phatak A and De Jong S 1997 The geometry of partial least squares J. Chemometr. 11 311-38
21. Schaefer R and Hauptmann P 2005 Acoustic impedance measurement using PLSR based analysis of ultrasonic signals Proc. 2005 IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. (Rotterdam, The Netherlands) pp 178-81
22. Kamarys D, Lenzen A and Waller H 1997 Realization of multicorrelated random excitation of structures Aspects in Modern Computational Structural Analysis ed K Meskouris and U Wittek (Rotterdam: Balkema)
23. Erlebacher G, Hussaini M Y and Jameson L M 1996 Wavelets-Theory and Application (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 115-18
24. Juang J-N 1994 Applied System Identification (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall) pp 16-39
25. Lütkepohl H 1996 Handbook of Matrices (New York: Wiley) p 249
26. Golub G H 1998 Matrix Computations 2nd edn (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press) pp 471-4
27. Schaefer R and Hauptmann P 2006 Ultrasonic density measurement of liquids-a novel method using a generalized singular value decomposition based system identification Proc. 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. (Vancouver, Canada) pp 140-3
28. Website JULABO Labortechnik GmbH: http://www.julabo.de (accessed February 2007)
29. Website Anton Paar: http://www.anton-paar.com (accessed February 2007)
30. Del Grosso V A and Mader C W 1972 Speed of sound in pure water J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52 1442-6
31. Wakeling I N and Morris J J 1993 A test of significance for partial least squares regression J. Chemom. 7 291-304
32. Website PI Piezotechnology: http://www.piceramic.de/pdf/KATALOG_english. pdf, p 18 (accessed February 2007)
33. Zhang Q M, Wang H, Kim N and Cross L E 1994 Direct evaluation of domain-wall and intrinsic contributions to the dielectric and piezoelectric response and their temperature dependence on lead zirconate-titanate ceramics J. Appl. Phys. 75 454-9
34. Schaefer R, Carlson J E and Hauptmann P 2006 Ultrasonic concentration measurement of aqueous solutions using PLS regression Ultrasonics 44 947-50