High-order harmonic generation with a strong laser field and an attosecond-pulse train: The Dirac-Delta comb and monochromatic limits

Laser Physics

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 390-400

  De Morisson Faria, C Figueira ^a   Salieres P ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Centre d Etudes Nucléaires de Saclay   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; LASER BEAM EFFECTS; QUANTUM INTERFERENCE PHENOMENA; QUANTUM OPTICS; SET THEORY;

DIRAC DELTA COMB; HIGH HARMONIC SPECTRA; MONOCHROMATIC LIMITS; QUANTUM ORBITS;

HARMONIC GENERATION;

EID: 34247135782     PISSN: 1054660X     EISSN: 15556611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S1054660X07040147     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. P. Agostini and L. DiMauro, Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 813 (2004).
2. M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, Ch. Spielmann, et al., Nature 414, 509 (2001).
3. M. Schnürer, Ch. Streli, P. Wobrauschek, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3392 (2000);
4. M. Drescher, M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, et al., Nature 419, 803 (2002).
5. H. Niikura, F. Légaré, R. Hasbani, et al., Nature 417, 917 (2002).
6. R. Kienberger, M. Hentschel, M. Uiberacker, et al., Science 297, 1144 (2002);
7. A. Baltuska, Th. Udem, M. Uiberacker, et al., Nature 421, 611 (2003).
8. Ph. Antoine, A. L'Huillier, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1234 (1996).
9. N. A. Papadogianis, B. Witzel, C. Kalpouzos, and D. Charalambidis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4289 (1999);
10. P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, et al., Science 292, 1689 (2001).
11. M. Drescher, M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, et al., Science 291, 1923 (2001).
12. Y. Mairesse, A. de Bohan, L. J. Frasinski, et al., Science 302, 1540 (2003).
13. T. Brabec and F. Krausz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 545 (2000).
14. K. J. Schafer, M. B. Gaarde, A. Heinrich, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 023003 (2004);
15. M. B. Gaarde, K. J. Schafer, A. Heinrich, et al., Phys. Rev. A 72, 013411 (2005);
16. J. Biegert, A. Heinrich, C. P. Hauri, et al., J. Mod. Opt. 53, 87 (2006);
17. J. Biegert, A. Heinrich, C. P. Hauri, et al., Laser Phys. 15, 899 (2005).
18. P. Johnsson, K. Varjú, T. Remetter, et al., J. Mod. Opt. 53, 233 (2006).
19. P. Johnsson, R. López-Martens, S. Kazamias, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 013001 (2005).
20. P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993);
21. K. C. Kulander, K. J. Schafer, and J. L. Krause, in Proceedings of the SILAP Conference, Ed. by B. Piraux et al. (Plenum, New York, 1993).
22. C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, P. Salières, P. Villain, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 74, 053416 (2006).
23. M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, et al., Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994);
24. W. Becker, S. Long, and J. K. McIver, Phys. Rev. A 41, 4112 (1990);
25. Phys. Rev. A 50, 1540 (1994);
26. M. Lewenstein, K. C. Kulander, K. J. Schafer, and Ph. Bucksbaum, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1495 (1995)
27. P. Salières, B. Carré, L. LeDéroff, et al., Science 292, 902 (2001).
28. The SFA consists in neglecting the atomic potential in the propagation of the electron in the continuum, the laser field when the electron is bound or rescatters, and the excited states of the atom in question.
29. C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, H. Schomerus, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 66, 043413 (2002).