Authorship attribution of texts: a review

Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics

Volumn 21, Issue , 2005, Pages 353-357

  Malyutov, M B ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247135508     PISSN: 15710653     EISSN: 15710653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.endm.2005.07.064     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abramyan A. The Armenian Cryptography. (in Armenian) (1974), Yerevan University Press
2. Bakhtin M. Problemy Poetiki Dostoevskogo. English translation (1984), University of Minnesota Press
3. Bosch R., and Smith J. Separating hyperplanes and the authorship of the disputed Federalist Papers. American Mathematical Monthly 105 7 (1998) 601-608
4. Brinegar C. Mark Twain and the Quintus Curtis Snodgrass Letters: A statistical test of authorship. Journal of American Statistical Association 58 301 (1963) 85-96
5. R. Cilibasi and P. Vitanyi, Clustering by compression, CWI manuscript, 2003, submitted
6. Burges C. A Tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2 2 (1998) 955-974
7. Cover T., and Thomas J. Elements of Information Theory (1991), Wiley, N.Y.
8. Donnelly I. The Great Cryptogram, 1 (1888) reprinted by
9. Donnelly I. The Great Cryptogram, 1 (1969), Bell and Howell, Cleveland
10. Efron B., and Thisted R. Estimating the number of unseen species; How many words did Shakespeare know?. Biometrika 63 (1975) 435-437
11. Thisted R., and Efron B. Did Shakespeare write a newly discovered poem?. Biometrika 74 (1987) 445-455
12. Friedman W., and Friedman E. The Shakespearean Ciphers Exposed (1957), Cambridge University Press
13. Katirai H. Filtering junk e-mail. see his web-site (1999). http://members.rogers.com/hoomank/
14. Khmelev D., and Tweedy F.J. Using markov chains for identification of writers. Literary and Linguistic Computing 16 4 (2001) 299-307
15. Kukushkina O., Polikarpov A., and Khmelev D. Text authorship attribution using letter and grammatical information. Problems of Information Transmission 37 2 (2001) 172-184
16. Markov A. On application of statistical method. Comptes Rendus of Imper. Academy of Sciences, Ser. VI X 153 (1913) 153
17. Markov A. On application of statistical method. Comptes Rendus of Imper. Academy of Sciences, Ser. VI X 153 (1916) 239
18. Matus I. Shakespeare, in Fact (1994), Continuum, N.Y.
19. Mendenhall T.A. The characteristic curves of composition. Science 11 (1887) 237-249
20. Mendenhall T.A. A mechanical solution to a literary problem. Popular Science Monthly 60 (1901) 97-105
21. Mitchell J. Who Wrote Shakespeare (1996), Thames and Hudson Ltd., London
22. Mosteller F., and Wallace D. Inference and Disputed Authorship (1964), Addison-Wesley, Reading
23. Nicholl Ch. The Reckoning. second edition (1992), Chicago University Press
24. Price D. Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography (2001), Greenwood Press, London
25. Rosenfeld R. A maximum entropy approach to adaptive statistical language. Modeling. Computer, Speech and Language 10 (1996) 187-228 a shortened version of the author's PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1994
26. Thompson J.W., and Padover S.K. Secret Diplomacy; Espionage and Cryptography (1963), F. Ungar Pub. Co., N. Y 1500-1815
27. De Vel O., Anderson A., Corney M., and Mohay G. Multi-Topic E-mail Authorship Attribution Forensics. Proc. Workshop on Data Mining for Security Applications, 8th ACM Conference on Computer Security. (CCS'2001) (2001)
28. Williams C. Word-length distribution in the works of Shakespeare and Bacon. Biometrika 62 (1975) 207-212
29. J. Zhao, The impact of cross-entropy on language modeling, PhD thesis, Mississippi State University, 1999. http://www.isip.msstate.edu/publications/courses/ece_7000_speech/lectures/1999/lecture_06/paper/paper_v1.pdf