Human intracranially-recorded cortical responses evoked by painful electrical stimulation of the sural nerve

NeuroImage

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 743-763

  Dowman, R ^a   Darcey, T ^b   Barkan, H ^b   Thadani, V ^b   Roberts, D ^b  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Intracranial recordings; Orienting response; Pain; Somatosensory evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; INSULA; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; NOCICEPTION; PAIN; PARIETAL LOBE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SURAL NERVE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; EPILEPSY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PAIN; SURAL NERVE;

EID: 34247106600     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Allison T., McCarthy G., Luby M., Puce A., and Spencer D.D. Localization of functional regions of human mesial cortex by somatosensory evoked potential recording and by cortical stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 100 (1996) 126-140
2. Arendt-Nielsen L., and Gotliebsen K. Segmental inhibition of laser-evoked brain potentials by ipsi- and contralaterally applied cold pressor pain. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 64 (1992) 56-61
3. Awh E., and Jonides J. Spatial working memory and spatial selective attention. In: Parasuraman R. (Ed). The Attentive Brain (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge MA 353-380
4. Backonja M., and Miletic V. Responses of neurons in the rat ventrolateral orbital cortex to phasic and tonic nociceptive stimulation. Brain Res. 557 (1991) 353-355
5. Beydoun A., Morrow T.J., Shen J.F., and Casey K.L. Variability of laser-evoked potentials: attention, arousal and lateralized differences. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 88 (1993) 173-181
6. Blume W.T., Jones D.C., Young G.B., Girvin J.P., and McLachlan R.S. Seizures involving secondary sensory and related areas. Brain 115 (1992) 1509-1520
7. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., and Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108 (2001) 624-652
8. Bromm B., and Lorenz J. Neurophysiological evaluation of pain. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 107 (1998) 227-253
9. Bushnell M.C., Villemure C., Strigo I., and Duncan G.H. Imaging pain in the brain: the role of the cerebral cortex in pain perception and modulation. J. Musculoskelet. Pain 10 (2002) 59-72
10. Coghill R.C., Gilron I., and Iadarola M.J. Hemispheric lateralization of somatosensory processing. J. Neurophysiol. 85 (2001) 2602-2612
11. Constantinidis C., and Steinmetz M.A. Posterior parietal cortex automatically encodes the location of salient stimuli. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 233-238
12. Corbetta M., and Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev., Neurosci. 31 (2002) 201-215
13. Crombez G., Van Damme S., and Eccleston C. Hypervigilance to pain: an experimental and clinical analysis. Pain 116 (2005) 4-7
14. Darcey T.M., Battiston J.J., Roberts D.W., and Williamson P.D. Computer-assisted localization of implanted electrode assemblies for multimodal image fusion and electroanatomical visualization. Epilepsia 37 (1996) 201
15. Davis K.D., Taylor S.J., Crawley A.P., Wood M.L., and Mikulis M.J. Functional MRI of pain- and attention-related activations in the human cingulate cortex. J. Physiol. 77 (1997) 3370-3380
16. de Fockert J., Rees G., Frith C., and Lavie N. Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 751-759
17. DeJong R., Liang C.-C., and Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual process model of the effect of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20 (1994) 731-750
18. Devinsky O., Morrell M.J., and Vogt B.A. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behavior. Brain 118 (1995) 279-306
19. Dong W.K., and Chudler E.H. Cortical nociceptive mechanisms. A review of neurophysiological and behavioral evidence in the primate. In: Besson J.M., Guilbaud G., and Ollat H. (Eds). Forebrain Areas Involved in Pain Processing (1995), John Libbey Eurotext, Paris 183-195
20. Dowman R. A non-invasive strategy for identifying and quantifying innocuous and nociceptive peripheral afferent activity evoked by nerve stimulation. Physiol. Behav. 53 (1993) 1163-1169
21. Dowman R. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. I. Identification of stable periods and individual differences. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92 (1994) 291-302
22. Dowman R. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. II. Effects of stimulus intensity on topographic pattern and amplitude. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92 (1994) 303-315
23. Dowman R. The effects of interstimulus interval on scalp topographies evoked by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. Psychophysiology 33 (1996) 398-408
24. Dowman R. The negative difference potential isolates scalp potentials generated by activity in supraspinal nociceptive pathways. Psychophysiology 33 (1996) 592-600
25. Dowman R. Interstimulus interval has no effect on a mid-latency scalp potential generated by innocuous-related activity in the primary somatosensory cortex. Brain Topogr. 10 (1997) 145-154
26. Dowman R. Attentional set effects on human innocuous somatosensory and pain pathways. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 451-464
27. Dowman R. Pain-evoked anterior cingulate activity generating the negative difference potential may reflect stimulus and/or response selection processes. Psychophysiology 39 (2002) 369-379
28. Dowman R. Distraction produces an increase in pain-evoked anterior cingulate activity. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 613-624
29. Dowman R. Electrophysiological indices of orienting attention towards pain. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 749-761
30. Dowman R. The pain-evoked P2 peak is not a P3a event-related potential. Brain Topogr. 17 (2004) 3-12
31. Dowman R. Topographic analysis of painful laser and sural nerve electrical evoked potentials. Brain Topogr. 16 (2004) 169-179
32. Dowman, R., submitted for publication-a. Neural Mechanisms Of Detecting and Orienting Attention Towards Unattended Somatosensory Targets. I. Inter-Modal Effects.
33. Dowman, R., submitted for publication-b. Neural Mechanisms Of Detecting and Orienting Attention Towards Unattended Somatosensory Targets. I. Intensity Effects.
34. Dowman R., and Darcey T.M. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. III. Dipole source analysis. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92 (1994) 373-391
35. Dowman R., and Schell S. The pain-related negative difference potential: a direct measure of central pain pathway activity or of interactions between the innocuous somatosensory and pain pathways?. Neurophysiol. Clin. 29 (1999) 423-442
36. Dowman R., and Schell S. Innocuous-related sural nerve-evoked and finger-evoked scalp potentials generated in the primary somatosensory and supplementary motor cortices. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 (1999) 2104-2116
37. Dowman R., and Schell S. Evidence that the anterior cingulate and supplementary somatosensory cortices generate the pain-related negative difference potential. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 (1999) 2117-2126
38. Downar J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., and Davis K.D. A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 277-283
39. Eccleston C., and Crombez G. Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychol. Bull. 125 (1999) 356-366
40. Eimer M., and Driver J. Crossmodal links in endogenous and exogenous spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25 (2001) 497-511
41. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., and Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25 (2001) 355-373
42. Frot M., Rambaud L., Guenot M., and Mauguiere F. Intracortical recordings of early pain-related CO2-laser evoked potentials in the human second somatosensory (SII) area. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 (1999) 133-145
43. Frot M., Garcia-Larrea L., Guenot M., and Mauguiere F. Response of the supra-sylvian (SII) cortex in humans to painful and innocuous stimuli. A study using intra-cerebral recordings. Pain 94 (2001) 65-73
44. Garcia-Larrea L., Peyron R., Laurent B., and Mauguiere F. Association and dissociation between laser-evoked potentials and pain perception. NeuroReport 8 (1997) 3785-3789
45. Garcia-Larrea L., Frot M., and Valeriani M. Brain generators of laser-evoked potentials: from dipoles to functional significance. Neurophysiol. Clin. 33 (2003) 279-292
46. Greenspan J.D., and Winfield J.A. Reversible pain and tactile deficits associated with a cerebral tumor compressing the posterior insula and parietal operculum. Pain 50 (1992) 29-39
47. Greenspan J.D., Lee R.R., and Lenz F.A. Pain sensitivity alterations as a function of lesion location in the parasylvian cortex. Pain 81 (1999) 273-282
48. Halgren E., Marinkovic K., and Chauvel P. Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106 (1998) 156-164
49. Hillyard S.A., and Anllo-Vento L. Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95 (1998) 781-787
50. Kakigi R. Diffuse noxious inhibitory control. Reappraisal by pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials following CO2 laser stimulation. J. Neurol. Sci. 125 (1994) 198-205
51. Kenshalo Jr. D.R., and Douglass D.K. The role of the cerebral cortex in the experience of pain. Adv. Pain Res. Ther. 22 (1995) 21-34
52. Kenshalo Jr. D.R., and Willis W.D. The role of the cerebral cortex in pain sensation. In: Petersen A., and Jones E.G. (Eds). The Cerebral Cortex vol. 9 (1991), Plenium Press, New York 153-212
53. Kiehl K.A., Laurens K.R., Duty T.L., Forster B.B., and Liddle P.F. Neural source involved in auditory detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 133-142
54. Kincaide J.M., Abrams R.A., Astafiev V., Shulman G.L., and Corbetta M. An event-related functional magnetic imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 4593-4604
55. Knight R.T. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 59 (1984) 9-20
56. Knight R.T. Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature 383 (1996) 256-259
57. Knight R.T., Scabini D., Woods D.L., and Clayworth C.C. Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3. Brain Res. 502 (1989) 109-116
58. Koyama T., Tanaka Y.Z., and Mikami A. Nociceptive neurons in the macaque anterior cingulated activate during anticipation of pain. NeuroReport 9 (1998) 2663-2667
59. Kropotov J.D., Crawford H.J., and Polyakov Y.I. Somatosensory event-related potential changes to painful stimuli during hypnotic analgesia: anterior cingulate cortex and anterior temporal cortex intracranial recordings. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 27 (1997) 1-8
60. Lenz F.A., Rios M., Chau D., Krauss G.L., Zirh T.A., and Lesser R.P. Painful stimuli evoked potentials recorded from the parasylvian cortex in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 80 (1998) 2077-2088
61. Lenz F.A., Rios M., Zirh A., Chau D., Krauss G., and Lesser R.P. Painful stimuli evoke potentials recorded over the human anterior cingulate gyrus. J. Neurophysiol. 79 (1998) 2231-2234
62. Lorenz J., and Garcia-Larrea L. Contribution of attentional and cognitive factors to laser evoked brain potentials. Neurophys. Clin. 33 (2003) 293-301
63. Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology 32 (1995) 4-18
64. Murray E.A., and Coulter J.D. Supplementary sensory area. The medial parietal cortex in the monkey. In: Woolsey C.N. (Ed). Cortical Sensory Organization, Vol. 1, Multiple Somatic Areas (1981), Humana Press, Clifton, NJ 167-195
65. Naatanen R. Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol. Bull. 92 (1982) 605-640
66. Naatanen R. Attention and Brain Function (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
67. Naatanen R., and Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24 (1987) 375-425
68. Naatanen R., Jacobsen T., and Winkler I. Memory-based or afferent processing in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 25-32
69. Nobre A.C. The attentive homunculus: now you see it, now you don't. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25 (2001) 477-496
70. Nunez P.L. Electric Fields of the Brain (1981), Oxford Univ. Press, New York
71. Nunez P.L., and Silberstein R.B. On the relationship of synaptic activity to macroscopic measurements: Does co-registration of EEG with fMRI make sense?. Brain Topogr. 13 (2000) 79-96
72. Ohara S., Crone N.E., Weiss N., Treede R.-D., and Lenz F.A. Amplitudes of laser evoked potentials recorded from primary somatosensory, parasylvian and medial frontal cortex are graded with stimulus intensity. Pain 110 (2004) 318-328
73. Ohara S., Crone N.E., Weiss N., Vogel H., Treede R.-D., and Lenz F.A. Attention to pain is processed at multiple cortical sites in man. Exp. Brain Res. 156 (2004) 513-517
74. Ostrowski K., Magnin M., Ryvlin P., Isnard J., Guenot M., and Mauguiere F. Representation of pain and somatic sensation in the human insula: a study of responses to direct electrical cortical stimulation. Cereb. Cortex 12 (2002) 376-385
75. Peyron R., Laurent B., and Garcia-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis. Neurophysiol. Clin. 30 (2000) 263-288
76. Peyron R., Rainville P., Petrovic P., and Garcia-Larrea L. Cognitive modulation of cortical responses to pain. In: Dostrovsky J.O., and Carr D.B. (Eds). Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Pain. Progress in Pain Research and Management vol 24 (2003) 277-293
77. Pickard N., and Strick P.L. Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb. Cortex 6 (1996) 342-353
78. Pickard N., and Strick P.L. Imaging the premotor areas. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11 (2001) 663-672
79. Polich J. Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. In: Polich J. (Ed). Detection of Change: Event-related Potential and fMRI Findings (2003), Kluwer Academic Press, Boston 83-98
80. Rainville P. Brain mechanisms of pain affect and pain modulation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12 (2002) 195-204
81. Robinson C.J., and Burton H. Somatic submodality distribution within the second somatosensory (SII), 7b, retroinsular, postauditory, and granular insular cortical areas. J. Comp. Neurol. 192 (1980) 93-108
82. Rosen A.C., Rao S.M., Caffaro P., Scaglini A., Babholtz J.A., Woodley S.J., Hammeke T.A., Cunningham J.M., Prieto T.E., and Bender J.R. Neural basis of endogenous and exogenous spatial orienting: a functional MRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11 (1999) 135-152
83. Schmahmann J.D., and Pandya D.N. Anatomical investigation of projections from thalamus to posterior parietal cortex in Rhesus monkey: a WGA-HRP and fluorescent tracer study. J. Comp. Neurol. 295 (1990) 299-326
84. Siedenberg R., and Treede R.D. Laser-evoked potentials: exogenous and endogenous components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 100 (1996) 240-249
85. Sikes R.W., and Vogt B.A. Nociceptive neurons in area 24 of rabbit cingulate cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 68 (1992) 1720-1732
86. Scholz J., Vieregge P., and Moser A. Central pain as a manifestation of partial epileptic seizures. Pain 80 (1999) 445-450
87. Sturmer B., Leuthold H., Soetens E., and Schroter H. Control over location-based response activations in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 (2002) 1345-1363
88. Tanji J. The supplementary motor area in the cerebral cortex. Neurosci. Res. 19 (1994) 251-268
89. Treede R.-D., Kenshalo D.R., Gracely R.H., and Jones A.K.P. The cortical representation of pain. Pain 79 (1999) 105-111
90. Treede R.-D., Apkarian A.V., Bromm B., Greenspan J.D., and Lenz F.A. Cortical representation of pain: functional characterization of nociceptive areas near the lateral sulcus. Pain 87 (2000) 113-119
91. Vogel H., Port J.D., Lenz F.A., Solaiyappan M., Krauss G., and Treede R.-D. Dipole source analysis of laser evoked subdural potentials recorded form parasylvian cortex in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 89 (2003) 3051-3060
92. Wascher E., Schatz U., Kuder T., and Verleger R. Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (2001) 731-751
93. Watanabe S., Kakigi R., Hoshiyama M., Kitamura Y., Koyama S., and Shimojo M. Effects of noxious cooling of the skin on pain perception in man. J. Neurol. Sci. 135 (1996) 68-73
94. Weisendanger M. Recent developments in studies of the supplementary motor area of primates. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 103 (1986) 1-59
95. Willer J.C. Comparative study of perceived pain and nociceptive flexion reflex in man. Pain 3 (1977) 69-80
96. Yamaguchi S., and Knight R.T. Effects of temporal-pariental lesions on the somatosensory P3 to lower limb stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 84 (1992) 139-148
97. Yamasaki H., Kakigi R., Watanabe S., and Naka D. Effects of distraction on pain perception: magneto- and electro-encephalographic studies. Cogn. Brain Res. 8 (1999) 73-76
98. Yamasaki H., Kakigi R., Watanabe S., and Hoshiyama M. Effects of distraction on pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and potentials following painful electrical stimulation. Cogn. Brain Res. 9 (2000) 165-175
99. Yantis S., and Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary vs. automatic allocation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16 (1990) 121-134
100. Zhang Z., and Jewett D.L. Insidious errors in dipole source localization parameters at a single time point due to model misspecification of number of shells. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 88 (1993) 1-11