The pain-evoked P2 is not a P3a event-related potential

Brain Topography

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-12

  Dowman, Robert ^a  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; P3a event related potential; Pain; Somatosensory evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; EVALUATION; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RECORDING; SENSORY STIMULATION; SURAL NERVE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFERENT PATHWAYS; ATTENTION; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; NEURAL CONDUCTION; NOCICEPTORS; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SURAL NERVE;

EID: 8544241728     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:BRAT.0000047332.24629.8e     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arendt-Nielsen, L. Characteristics, detection, and modulation of laser-evoked vertex potentials. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Supplementum 101, 1994, 38: 7-44.
2. Arendt-Nielsen, L. and Gotliebsen, K. Segmental inhibition of laser-evoked brain potentials by ipsi- and contralaterally applied cold presser pain. Eur. J. Applied Physiol., 1992, 64: 56-61.
3. Becker, D.E., Haley, D.W., Urena, V.M. and Yingling, C.D. Pain measurement with evoked potentials: combination of subjective ratings, randomized intensities, and long inter-stimulus intervals produces a P300-like confound. Pain, 2000, 84: 37-47.
4. Becker, D.E., Yingling, C.D. and Fein, G. Identification of pain, intensity and P300 components in the pain evoked potential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 88: 290-301.
5. Beydoun, A., Morrow, T.J., Shen, J.F. and Casey, K.L. Variability of laser-evoked potentials: attention, arousal and lateralized differences. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 88: 173-181.
6. Bromm, B. Evoked cerebral potential and pain. Adv. Pain Res. Ther., 1985, 9: 305-329.
7. Bromm, B. and Chen A.C.N. Brain electrical source analysis of laser evoked potentials in response to painful trigeminal nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 95: 14-26.
8. Bromm, B. and Lorenz, J. Neurophysiological evaluation of pain. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1998, 107: 227-253.
9. Chen, A.C.N., Chapman, C.R. and Harkins, S.W. Brain evoked potentials are functional correlates of induced pain in man. Pain, 1979, 6: 365-374.
10. Chen, A.C.N., Treede, R.-D. and Bromm, B. Tonic pain inhibits phasic pain: evoked cerebral potential correlates in man. Psychiatry Res., 1985, 14: 343-351.
11. Cowan, N. An embedded-process model of working memory. In: A. Miyake and P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 62-101.
12. Donchin, E., Coles, M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci., 1988, 11: 357-374.
13. Dowman, R. Spinal and supraspinal correlates of nociception in man. Pain, 1991, 45: 269-281.
14. Dowman, R. A non-invasive strategy for identifying and quantifying innocuous and nociceptive peripheral afferent activity evoked by nerve stimulation. Physiol. Beh., 1993, 53: 1163-1169.
15. Dowman, R. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. I. Identification of stable periods and individual differences. Electroencephalogr., Clin. Neurophysio., 1994a, 92: 291-302.
16. Dowman, R. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. II. Effects of stimulus intensity on topographic pattern and amplitude. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1994b, 92: 303-315.
17. Dowman, R. The effects of interstimulus interval on scalp topographies evoked by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. Psychophysiol., 1996, 33: 398-408.
18. Dowman, R. Attentional set effects on spinal and supraspinal response to pain. Psychophysiol., 2001, 38: 451-464.
19. Dowman, R. Pain-evoked anterior cingulate activity generating the negative difference potential may reflect response selection processes. Psychophysiol., 2002, 39: 369-379.
20. Dowman, R. Distraction produces an increase in pain-evoked anterior cingulate activity. Psychophysiology, 2004a, 41: 613-624.
21. Dowman, R. Topographic analysis of painful laser and sural nerve electrical evoked potentials. Brain Topography, 2004b, 16: 169-179.
22. Dowman, R. Electrophysiological indices of orienting attention towards pain. Psychophysiology, in press c.
23. Dowman, R. and Goshko, L. Evaluation of reference sites for scalp potentials elicited by painful and non-painful sural nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 477-485.
24. Dowman, R. and Schell, S. The pain-related negative difference potential: A direct measure of central pain pathway activity or of interactions between the innocuous somatosensory and pain pathways? Neurophysiol. Clin., 1999, 29: 423-442.
25. Eccleston, C. and Crombez, G. Pain demands attention: A cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psych. Bull., 1999, 125: 356-366.
26. Escera, C., Alho, K., Schroger, E. and Winkler, I. Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol. Neuroontol., 2000, 5: 151-166.
27. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y.M. and Gaeta, H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2001, 25: 355-373.
28. Gaeta, H., Friedman, D. and Hunt, G. Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspect of the novelty P3. Psychophysiol., 2003, 40: 198-208.
29. Garcia-Larrea, L., Peyron, R., Laurent, B. and Mauguiere, F. Association and dissociation between laser-evoked potentials and pain perception. NeuroReport, 1997, 8: 3785-3789.
30. Goldstein, A., Spencer, K.M. and Donchin, E. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. Psychophysiol., 2002, 39: 781-790.
31. Jentzsch, I. and Sommer, W. Sequence-sensitive subcomponents of P300: Topographical analysis and dipole source localization. Psychophysiol., 2001, 38: 607-621.
32. Kakigi, R. Diffuse noxious inhibitory control. Reappraisal by pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials following CO2 laser stimulation. J. Neurol. Sci., 1994, 125: 198-205.
33. Kanda, M., Fujiwara, N., Xu, X., Shindo, K., Nagamine, T., Ikeda, A. and Shibasaki, H. Pain-related and cognitive components of somatosensory evoked potentials following CO2 laser stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1996, 100: 105-114.
34. Legrain, V., Bruyer, R., Guerit, J.-M. and Plaghki, L. Nociceptive processing in the human brain of infrequent task-relevant and task irrelevant noxious stimuli. A study with event-related potentials evoked by CO2 laser radiant heat stimuli. Pain, 2003a, 103: 237-248.
35. Legrain, V., Guerit, J-M., Bruyer, R. and Plaghki, L. Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials. Pain, 2002, 99: 21-39.
36. Legrain, V., Guerit, J.-M., Bruyer, R. and Plaghki, L. Electrophysiological correlates of attentional orientation in humans to strong intensity deviant nociceptive stimuli, inside and outside the focus of spatial attention. Neurosci. Let., 2003b, 339: 107-110.
37. McCarthy, G. and Wood, C.C. Scalp distribution of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 62: 203-208.
38. Miltner, W., Johnson, Jr, R., Braun, C. and Larbig, W. Somatosensory event-related potentials to painful and non-painful stimuli: effects of attention. Pain, 1989, 38: 303-312.
39. Naatanen, R. Attention and Brain Function. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1992.
40. Nunez, P.L. Electric Fields of the Brain. New York: Oxford University Press 1981.
41. Polich, J. Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. In: J. Polich (Ed.), Detection of Change: Event-Related Potential and fMRI Findings. Kluwer Academic Press: Boston 2003: 83-98.
42. Scherg, M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: G. Grandori, M. Hoke and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Auditory evoked magnetic and electric potentials Karger: Basel, 1990: 40-69.
43. Sharbrough, F., Chatrian, G.E., Lesser, R.P., Luders, H., Nuwer, M. and Picton, T.W. Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 8: 200-202.
44. Siedenberg, R. and Treede, R.D. Laser-evoked potentials: exogenous and endogenous components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1996, 100: 240-249.
45. Spencer, K.M., Dien, J. and Donchin, E. Spatiotemporal analysis of late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiol., 2001, 38: 343-358.
46. Tarkka, I.M. and Treede R.-D. Equivalent electrical source analysis of pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by a CO2 laser. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 10: 513-519.
47. Valeriani, M., Rambaud, L. and Mauguiere, F. Scalp topography and dipolar source modeling of potentials evoked by CO2 laser stimulation of the hand. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1996, 100: 343-353.
48. Watanabe, S., Kakigi, R., Hoshiyama, M., Kitamura, Y., Koyama, S. and Shimojo, M. Effects of noxious cooling of the skin on pain perception in man. J. Neurol. Sci., 1996, 135: 68-73.
49. Yamaguchi, S. and Knight, R.T. P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 78: 50-55.
50. Yamaguchi, S. and Knight, R.T. Effects of temporal-pariental lesions on the somatosensory P3 to lower limb stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 139-148.
51. Zaslansky, R., Sprecher, E., Tenke, C.E., Hemli, J.A. and Yarnitsky, D. The P300 in pain evoked potentials. Pain, 1996, 66: 39-49.