The evaluation of direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition - Clinical performance and patient satisfaction

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 361-376

  Poyser, N J ^a,b,c,e   Briggs, P F A ^a,b   Chana, H S ^a,d   Kelleher, M G D ^b   Porter, R W J ^a,b   Patel, M M ^a  

^a ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c MAYDAY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d KINGSTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adult; Composite resins; Patient satisfaction; Prospective studies; Tooth attrition; Tooth erosion; Vertical dimension

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; HERCULITE XR; OPTIBOND; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH DISEASES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 34247092439     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01702.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kelleher M, Bishop K. Tooth surface loss: an overview. Br Dent J. 1999;186:61-66.
2. Eccles JD. Tooth surface loss from abrasion, attrition and erosion. Dent Update. 1982;35:373-381.
3. Berry DC, Poole DFG. Attrition: possible mechanisms of compensation. J Oral Rehabil. 1976;3:201-206.
4. Dahl BL, Krogstad O, Karlsen K. An alternative treatment of cases with advanced localised attrition. J Oral Rehabil. 1975;2:209-214.
5. Poyser NJ, Porter RW, Briggs PFA, Chana HS, Kelleher MGD. The Dahl Concept: past, present and future. Br Dent J. 2005;198:669-676.
6. Hemmings KW, Darbar UR, Vaughan S. Tooth wear treated with direct composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: results at 30 months. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:287-93.
7. Redman CDJ, Hemming KW, Good JA. The survival and clinical performance of resin-based composite restorations used to treat localised anterior tooth wear. Br Dent J. 2003;194:566-572.
8. Smith BGN, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J. 1984;156:435-438.
9. Gow AM, Hemmings KW. The treatment of localised anterior tooth wear with indirect Artglass® restorations at an increased occlusal vertical dimension. Results after two years. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent. 2002;10:101-105.
10. Gough MB, Setchell DJ. A retrospective study of 50 treatments using an appliance to produce localised occlusal space by relative axial tooth movement. Br Dent J. 1999;187:134-139.
11. Firas Daoudi M, Radford JR. Use of a matrix to form directly applied resin composite to restore worn anterior teeth. Dent Update. 2001;28:512-514.
12. Mizrahi B. A technique for simple and aesthetic treatment of anterior toothwear. Dent Update. 2004;31:109-114.
13. Wieczkowski G, Joynt RB, Klockowski R, Davis EL. Effects of incremental versus bulk fill technique on resistance to cuspal fracture of teeth restored with posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60:283-287.
14. Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to the configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1636-1639.
15. Chana H, Kelleher M, Briggs P, Hooper R. Clinical evaluation of resin-bonded gold alloy veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:294-300.
16. Walls AWG. The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during the management of fractured and worn anterior teeth: Part 2. Clinical results after 5 years of follow-up. Br Dent J. 1995;178:337-340.