Effectiveness of two forms of feedback on training of a joint mobilization skill by using a joint translation simulator

Physical Therapy

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 418-430

  Chang, Ju Ying ^a   Chang, Guan Liang ^a   Chien, Chia Jen Chang ^a   Chung, Kao Chi ^a   Hsu, Ar Tyan ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EXERCISE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FORCE TRANSDUCER; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILIZATION; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHOULDER; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SKILL; STUDENT; TRAINING;

ADULT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINTS; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT; MUSCULOSKELETAL MANIPULATIONS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES;

EID: 34147223321     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060154     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Heartling D, Kessler RM. Management of Common Musculoskeletal Disorders: Physical Therapy Principles and Methods. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott; 1996.
2. Kaltenborn F. Manual Mobilization of the Extremity Joints: Basic Examination and Treatment Techniques. 4th ed. Oslo, Norway: Olaf Norlis; 1989.
3. Maitland GD. Peripheral Manipulation. 3rd ed. London, United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991.
4. Ben-Sorek S, Davis CM. Joint mobilization education and clinical use in the United States. Phys Ther. 1988;68:1000-1004.
5. Conroy DE, Hayes KW. The effect of joint mobilization as a component of comprehensive treatment for primary shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:3-14.
6. Olson VL. Evaluation of joint mobilization treatment: a method. Phys Ther. 1987;67: 351-356.
7. Harms MC, Bader DL. Variability of forces applied by experienced therapists during spinal mobilization. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997;12:393-399.
8. Hsu AT, Ho L, Chang JH, et al. Characterization of tissue resistance during a dorsally directed translational mobilization of the glenohumeral joint. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:360-366.
9. McQuade KJ, Shelley I, Cvitkovic J. Patterns of stiffness during clinical examination of the glenohumeral joint. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14:620-627.
10. Simmonds MJ, Kumar S, Lechelt E. Use of a spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists' tests of spinal motion. Phys Ther. 1995;75:212-222.
11. Lee M, Moseley A, Refshauge K. Effect of feedback on learning a vertebral joint mobilization skill. Phys Ther. 1990;70:97-102; discussion 103-104.
12. Magill RA. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. 7th ed. Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
13. Zelaznik HN, ed. Advances in Motor Learning and Control. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1996.
14. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull. 1984;95:355-386.
15. Kilduski NC, Rice MS. Qualitative and quantitative knowledge of results: effects on motor learning. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:329-336.
16. Bilodeau EA, Bilodeau IM, Schumsky DA. Some effects of introducing and withdrawing knowledge of results early and late in practice. J Exp Psychol. 1959;58:142-144.
17. Newell KM, Wade MG. Stabilometer trial length as a function of performance. Res Q. 1974;45:16-20.
18. Blackwell JR, Newell KM. The informational role of knowledge of results in motor learning. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1996; 92:119-129.
19. Vander Linden DW, Cauraugh JH, Greene TA. The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Phys Ther. 1993;73:79-87.
20. Annett J. Acquisition of skill. Br Med Bull. 1971;27:266-271.
21. Hebert EP, Landin D. Effects of a learning model and augmented feedback on tennis skill acquisition. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994; 65:250-257.
22. McConnell A. Effect of knowledge of results on attitude formed toward a motor learning task. Res Q. 1976;47:394-399.
23. Sewall LP, Reeve TG, Day RA. Effect of concurrent visual feedback on acquisition of a weightlifting skill. Percept Mot Skills. 1988;67:715-718.
24. Park JH, Shea CH, Wright DL. Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: a test of the guidance hypothesis. J Mot Behav. 2000;32:287-296.
25. van Dijk H, Hermens HJ. Effects of age and timing of augmented feedback on learning muscle relaxation while performing a gross motor task. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:148-155; quiz 156-148.
26. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Lewthwaite R. Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994;65:316-323.
27. Schmidt RA, Wulf G. Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: implications for training and simulation. Hum Factors. 1997;39:509-525.
28. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Cardinale C, et al. Learning a partial-weight- bearing skill: effectiveness of two forms of feedback. Phys Ther. 1996;76:985-993.
29. Keating J, Matyas TA, Bach TM. The effect of training on physical therapists' ability to apply specified forces of palpation. Phys Ther. 1993;73:45-53.
30. Patrick J, Mutlusoy F. The relationship between types of feedback, gain of a display and feedback precision in acquisition of a simple motor task. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1982;34(Pt 1):171-182.
31. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS. Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Exp Brain Res. 1995;105:163-174.
32. Winstein CJ. Knowledge of results and motor learning: implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1991;71:140-149.
33. Guadagnoli MA, Kohl RM. Knowledge of results for motor learning: relationship between error estimation and knowledge of results frequency. J Mot Behav. 2001;33: 217-224.
34. Wishart LR, Lee TD, Cunningham SJ, Murdoch JE. Age-related differences and the role of augmented visual feedback in learning a bimanual coordination pattern. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002;110:247-263.
35. Wierinck E, Puttemans V, Swinnen S, van Steenberghe D. Effect of augmented visual feedback from a virtual reality simulation system on manual dexterity training. Eur J Dent Educ. 2005;9:10-16.
36. Pringle RK. Guidance hypothesis with verbal feedback in learning a palpation skill. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:36-42.
37. Wishart LR, Lee TD. Effects of aging and reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results on learning a motor skill. Percept Mot Skills. 1997;84(3 Pt 1):1107-1122.