Discovery of till deposition at the grounding line of Whillans Ice Stream

Science

Volumn 315, Issue 5820, 2007, Pages 1835-1838

  Anandakrishnan, Sridhar ^a   Catania, Ginny A ^b   Alley, Richard B ^a   Horgan, Huw J ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ICE;

GLACIAL EROSION; GLACIAL SEDIMENTATION; GROUNDING LINE; ICE SHEET; ICE THICKNESS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEA LEVEL CHANGE; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SUBGLACIAL ENVIRONMENT; TILL;

ANTARCTICA; ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEDIMENTATION; TELECOMMUNICATION;

ANTARCTICA; WEST ANTARCTICA;

EID: 34147217225     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1138393     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. M. F. Meier, A. Post, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 9051 (1987).
2. P. Clark, D. Pollard, Paleoceanography 13, 1 (1998).
3. B. Hallet, L. Hunter, J. Bogen, Global Planet. Change 12, 213 (1996).
4. R. B. Alley, S. Anandakrishnan, T. K. Dupont, B. R. Parizek, D. Pollard, Science 315, 1838 (2007); published online 1 March 2007 (10.1126/science.1138396).
5. A. Gades, thesis, University of Washington (1998).
6. H. J. Horgan, S. Anandakrishnan, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L18502 (2006).
7. S. Shabtaie, C. R. Bentley, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 1311 (1987).
8. The alternative explanation for termination of the wedge (i.e., it is cut by bedrock raised along a near-vertical fault plane striking across our line) is geologically unlikely considering the dominant trend of structures in the region, which are controlled by north-south extension.
9. V. V. Bogorodsky, C. R. Bentley, P. E. Gudmandsen, Radioglaciology (Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1985).
10. R. E. Sheriff, L. P. Geldart, Exploration Seismology (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, ed. 2, 1995).
11. No transverse radar lines crossed this feature. However, our longitudinal line was placed with no a priori knowledge of the feature, making it unlikely that this is a narrow feature that we found by chance.
12. T. Murray et al., J. Geophys. Res. 105, 13491 (2000).
13. P. M. Tucker, H. J. Yorston, Pitfalls in Seismic Interpretation, J. C. Hollister, Ed. (Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, 1973).
14. L. E. Peters et al., J. Geophys. Res. 111, B01302 (2006).
15. B. Kamb, The West Antarctic Ice Sheet: Behavior and Environment, R. B. Alley, R. A. Bindschadler, Eds. (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 2001), pp. 157-200.
16. The phase of the reflection from the base φ of the till is diagnostic of porosity, with reflection phase angles ranging from 70° to 120° for porosity from 45 to 15%, respectively. However, our instrument was not phase sensitive; future work with a phase-sensitive radar or with seismic experiments would determine this property.
17. H. Conway, B. L. Hall, G. H. Denton, Science 286, 280 (1999).
18. S. Shipp, J. B. Anderson, E. W. Domack, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 111, 1486 (1999).
19. A. B. Mosola, J. B. Anderson, Quot. Sci. Rev. 25, 2177 (2006).
20. E. Domack, E. Jacobson, S. Shipp, J. Anderson, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 111, 1517 (1999).
21. D. Blankenship, S. Rooney, R. Alley, C. Bentley, Ann. Glaciol. 12, 200 (1989).
22. B. Hallet, L. Hunter, J. Bogen, Global Planet. Change 12, 213 (1996).
23. Similar or somewhat larger sediment fluxes are indicated by the geometry and likely time for deposition of the grounding-zone wedges described by Mosola and Anderson (19), which is consistent with the ice sheet having expanded over easily eroded, poorly consolidated sediments of the Ross Sea.
24. P. Christoffersen, S. Tulaczyk, F. D. Carsey, A. E. Behar, J. Geophys. Res. 111, F01017 (2006).
25. D. M. Holland, S. S. Jacobs, A. Jenkins, Antarct. Sci. 15, 13 (2003).
26. H. Engelhardt, W. B. Kamb, J. Glaciol. 44, 223 (1998).
27. N. R. Iverson, T. S. Hooyer, R. W. Baker, J. Glaciol. 44, 634 (1998).
28. R. B. Alley, Deformation of Glaciol Materials, A. J. Maltman, B. Hubbard, M. J. Hambrey, Eds. (Special Publication 176, Geological Society of London, 2000), pp. 171-179.
29. P. N. Sen, C. Scala, M. H. Cohen, Geophysics 46, 781 (1981).
30. We thank D. Voigt, I. Joughin, P. Winberry, L. Peters, B. Bindschadler, and P. Burkett for their help; and University Navstar Consortium (UNAVCO), Raytheon Polar Services, and Kenn Borek Air for logistical support. Partial support was provided by NSF through grant numbers 0229629, 0226535, 0424589, 0440447, 0440899, 0447235, 0531211, and 0539578, and by the Gary Comer Science and Education Foundation.