EthoSeq: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and data mining in behavioral sequences

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 549-556

  Japyassú, Hilton F ^a   Alberts, Carlos C ^b   Izar, Patrícia ^c   Sato, Takechi ^c  

^a INSTITUTO BUTANTAN   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147207054     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193884     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ALBERTS, C. C. (1996). O comportamento de autolimpeza do gato doméstico (Felis catus) e uma proposta para usá-lo como caractere filogenético. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of São Paulo.
2. ANNABLE, A., & WEARDEN, J. H. (1979). Grooming movements as operants in the rat. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 297-304.
3. ATZ, J. W. (1970). The application of the idea of homology to behavior. In L. R.Aronson,E. Tobach, D. S. Lehrman, & J. S. Rosenblatt (Eds.), Development and evolution of behavior: Essays in honor of T. C. Schneirla (pp. 53-74). San Francisco: Freeman.
4. BAKEMAN, R., & GOTTMAN, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. BAKEMAN, R., & QUERA, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. BERRIDGE, K. C. (1990). Comparative fine structure of action: Rules of form and sequence in the grooming patterns of six rodent species. Behaviour, 113, 21-56.
7. BROOKS, D. R., & MCLENNAN, D. A. (1991). Phytogeny, ecology, and behavior: A research program in comparative biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. BROWN, M. B. (1974). Identification of the sources of significance in two-way contingency tables. Applied Statistics, 23, 405-413.
9. BUSACKER, R. G., & SAATY, T. L. (1965). Finite graphs and networks. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. CAIRES, R. A., & JAPYASSÚ, H. F. (2003). Predatory plasticity in a new spider species: An expression of web architecture? Revista de Etologia, 5, 149-150.
11. DE QUEIROZ, A., & WIMBERGER, P. H. (1993). The usefulness of behavior for phylogeny estimation: Levels of homoplasy in behavioral and morphological characters. Evolution, 47, 46-60.
12. FENTRESS, J. C. (1973). Development of grooming in mice with amputated forelimbs. Science, 179, 704-705.
13. FOREY, P. L., HUMPHRIES, C. J., KITCHING, I. L., SCOTLAND, R. W., SIEBERT, D. J., & WILLIAMS, D. M. (1992). Cladistics: A practical course in systematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
14. GALERA, C. A., TOYODA, C. Y., & DOBRIANSKYJ, L. N. (1983). Descrição etológica dos comportamentos de ratos albinos. Monografia em Etologja, Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo.
15. GARCIA, C. R. M., & JAPYASSÚ, H. F. (2005). Stereotypy and plasticity in the predatory sequence of Theridion evexum, Keyserling 1884 (Araneae: Theridiidae). Biota Neotropica, 5(1A). Available at www.biotaaeotropica.org.br/v5nla/en/abstract?article+BN001051a2005.
16. GITTLEMAN, J. L. (Ed.) (1991). Carnivore behavior, ecology and evolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
17. GOODMAN, L. A. (1968). The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63, 1091-1131.
18. GOULD, S. J. (1966). Allometry and size in ontogeny and phytogeny. Biological Reviews, 41, 587-640.
19. GOULD, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.
20. GREENE, H. W. (1994). Homology and behavioral repertoires. In B. K. Hall (Ed.), Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology (pp. 369-391). San Diego: Academic Press.
21. HABERMAN, S. J. (1973). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics, 29, 205-220.
22. HACCOU, P., & MEELIS, E. (1992). Statistical analysis of behavioral data: An approach based on time-structured models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. HAZLETT, B. A. (Ed.) (1977). Quantitative methods in the study of animal behavior. New York: Academic Press.
24. HENNIG, W. (1966). Phylogenetic systematics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
25. HOOFF, J. A. R. A. M. VAN (1982). Categories and sequences of behavior: Methods of description and analysis. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 362-439). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. JAPYASSÚ, H. F., ALBERTS, C. C., IZAR, P., & SATO, T. (2003). Sinal filogenético em seqüências comportamentais longas: A plasticidade introduz ruído na análise? In IV Encontro de Aracnólogos do Cone Sul, 4, 44-45.
27. JAPYASSÚ, H. F., & JOTTA, E. G. (2005). Foraging in Achaearanea cinnabarina Levi 1963 (Araneae, Theridiidae) and evolution of hunting in spiders with irregular webs. Biota Neotropica, 5(1A). Available at www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v5n1a/en/abstract? article+BN0030 51a2005.
28. JAPYASSÚ, H. F., & VIERA, C. (2002). Predatory plasticity in Nephilengys cruentata (Araneae, Tetragnathidae): Relevance for phylogeny reconstruction. Behaviour, 139, 529-544.
29. KONORSKI, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.
30. MAGNUSSON, M. S. (2000). Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 93-110.
31. MARTINS, E. P. (1996). Phytogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. MCLENNAN, D. A., BROOKS, D. R., & MCPHAIL, J. D. (1988). The benefits of communication between comparative ethology and phylogenetic systematics: A case study using gasterosteid fishes. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66, 2177-2190.
33. NOLDUS, L. P. J. J., TRIENES, R. J. H., HENDRIKSEN, A. H. M., JANSEN, H., & JANSEN, R. G. (2000). The Observer Video-Pro: New software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments. & Computers, 32, 197-206.
34. ODLING-SMEE, F. J., LALAND, K. N., & FELDMAN, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35. OLIVEIRA, A. P. F. (2002). Comportamento social de machos e fêmeas castrados do gato doméstico (Felis catus) em confinamento. Unpublished master's thesis, University of São Paulo.
36. OTTONI, E. B. (2000). EthoLog 2.2: A tool for the transcription and timing of behavior observation sessions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 446-449.
37. PATERSON, A. M., WALLIS, G. P., & GRAY, R. D. (1995). Penguins, petrels, and parsimony: Does cladistic analysis of behavior reflect seabird phylogeny? Evolution, 49, 974-989.
38. PRUM, R. O. (1994). Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of alternative social behavior in the manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Evolution, 48, 1657-1675.
39. QUADROS, A. H. (2002). Filogenia da família Cathartidae (Aves) baseada em comportamento de autolimpeza. Unpublished master's thesis, University of São Paulo.
40. SHETTLEWORTH, S. F. (1972). Constraints on learning. In D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde, & E. Shaw (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (pp. 4.1-4.68). New York: Academic Press.
41. SLATER, P. J. B. (1973). Describing sequences of behavior. In P. P. G. Bateson & P. H. Klopfer (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology (pp. 131-153). New York: Plenum.
42. SLIKAS, B. (1998). Recognizing and testing homology of courtship displays in storks (Aves: Ciconiiformes: Ciconiidae). Evolution, 52, 884-893.
43. SWOFFORD, D. L. (2002). PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods) (Version 4) [Computer software]. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.