The inevitable pull of the river's current: Interpretations derived From a single text using multiple research traditions

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 548-561

  Slaughter, Susan ^a   Dean, Yasmin ^b   Knight, Holly ^c   Krieg, Brigette ^d   Mor, Pnina ^e   Nour, Violet ^a   Polegato, Ellen ^a   Seneviratne, Cydnee ^a   Shenfield, Darcy G ^f   Sherwood, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b MOUNT ROYAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Professional Practice and Development (Allied Health)   (Canada)

^d FIRST NATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CANADA   (Canada)

^e SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^f Dr Margaret Savage Crisis Centre ^*

Author keywords

Ethnography; Grounded theory; Interpretation; Narrative inquiry; Participatory action research

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH; ARTICLE; DOCTORAL EDUCATION; ETHNOGRAPHY; GROUNDED THEORY; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; NARRATIVE; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STUDENT;

ANTHROPOLOGY, CULTURAL; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NARRATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; READING; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; WRITING;

EID: 34147175944     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732306298812     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aranda, S., & Street, A. (2001). Methodological issues in nursing research. From individual to group: Use of narratives in a participatory research process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33 (6), 791-797.
2. Barrett, F., & Fry, R. (2002). Appreciative inquiry in action: The unfolding of a provocative invitation. In R. Fry, F. Barrett, J. Seiling, & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry and organizational transformation: Reports from the field (pp. 1-8). Westport, CT: Quorum.
3. Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Caelli, K. (2001). Engaging with phenomenology: Is it more of a challenge than it needs to be? Qualitative Health Research, 11, 273-281.
5. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Corbin, J. (2002, April). A general overview of grounded theory method. Presented to the faculty and students in the Department of Sports Psychology, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
8. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Cutcliffe, J.R., & McKenna, H.P. (1999). Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: The plot thickens. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30 (2), 374-380.
10. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). Strategies of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 367-378). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Edwards, C., & Titchen, A. (2003). Research into patients' perspectives: Relevance and usefulness of phenomenological sociology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44 (5), 450-460.
12. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A.P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Emerson, R.M., & Pollner, M. (2002). Difference and dialogue: Members' readings of ethnographic texts. In D. Weinberg (Ed.), Qualitative research methods (pp. 154-170). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
15. Frank, A. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Geanellos, R. (2000). Exploring Ricoeur's hermeneutic theory of interpretation as a method of analyzing research texts. Nursing Inquiry, 7, 112-119.
17. Germain, C. (2001). Ethnography the method. In P. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (3 rd ed., pp. 277-306). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
18. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
19. Glaser, B.G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1 (2), Article 3. Retrieved May 7, 2003, from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/ backissues/1_2Final/html/glaser.html
20. Goulding, C. (1998). Grounded theory: The missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1 (9), 50-57.
21. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
22. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. MacLure, M., & Stronach, I. (1993). Jack in two boxes: A post-modern perspective on the transformation of persons in to portraits. Interchange, 24 (4), 353-380.
24. Oberg, R. (2003). Teaching interpretation. In R. Josselson, A. Lieblich, & D. McAdams (Eds.), Up close and personal: The teaching and learning of narrative research (pp. 113-134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Priest, H., Roberts, P., & Woods, L. (2002 a). An overview of three different approaches to the interpretation of qualitative data, Part 1: Theoretical issues. Nurse Researcher, 10 (1), 30-42.
26. Priest, H., Roberts, P., & Woods, L. (2002 b). An overview of three different approaches to the interpretation of qualitative data, Part 2: Practical illustrations. Nurse Researcher, 10 (1), 43-51.
27. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Inquiry and participation: In search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 1-14). London, UK: Sage.
28. Savage, J. (2000). One voice, different tunes: Issues raised by dual analysis of a segment of qualitative data. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31 (6), 1493-1500.
29. Schreiber, R.S. (2001). The "how to" of grounded theory: Avoiding the pitfalls. In R. S Schreiber & P. N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 55-83). New York: Springer.
30. Schutz, S.E. (1994). Exploring the benefits of a subjective approach in qualitative nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20, 412-417.
31. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
32. Smith, M.Y., Redd, W.H., Peyser, C., & Vogl, D. (1999). Post-traumatic stress disorder in cancer: A review. Psycho-Oncology, 8, 521-537.
33. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
34. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
35. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Streubert-Speziale, H., & Rinaldi Carpenter, D. (2003). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (3 rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
37. Tedlock, B. (2000). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 455-486). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Trujillo, N. (1998). In search of Naunny's grave. Text and Performance Quarterly, 18, 344-368.
39. Wettergren, L., Langius, A., Bjorkholm, M., & Bjorvell, H. (1999). Post-traumatic stress symptoms in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Acta Oncologica, 38 (4), 475-480.
40. Wimpenny, P., & Gass, J. (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: Is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31 (6), 1485-1492.