Engaging with phenomenology: Is it more of a challenge than it needs to be?

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 273-281

  Caelli, Kate ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LIFE EVENT; LITERATURE; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE;

ANECDOTES; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; LIFE CHANGE EVENTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0035287007     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104973201129118993     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Batchelor, J., & Briggs, C. (1994). Subject, project, or self? Thoughts on ethical dilemmas for social and medical researchers. Social Science and Medicine, 39(7), 949-954.
2. Benner, P. (Ed.). (1994). Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bergum, V. (1991). Being a phenomenological researcher. In J. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 55-71). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Bier, M., Sherblom, S., & Gallo, M. (1996). Ethical issues in a study of Internet users: Uncertainty, responsibility, and the spirit of research relationships. Ethics & Behavior, 6(2), 141-151.
5. Caelli, K. (2000). The changing face of phenomenological research: Traditional and American phenomenology in nursing. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 366-377.
6. Collins Cobuild English language dictionary. (1987). Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
7. Crotty, M. (1995). Phenomenology as radical criticism. In F. Kretlow, D. Harvey, J. Grubb, J. Raybould, G. Sandhu, & H. Dosser (Eds.), Proceedings, Asia-Pacific human science research conference (pp. 87-97). Gippsland, Australia: Monash University.
8. Crotty, M. (1996a). Doing phenomenology. In M. Parer & Z. Unger (Eds.), Proceedings, qualitative methods workshop. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University, Office of Continuing Education.
9. Crotty, M. (1996b). Phenomenology and nursing research. Melbourne, Australia: Churchill Livingstone.
10. Field, P.-A., & Morse, J. (1985). Nursing research: The application of qualitative approaches. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
11. Hamilton, D. (1994). Traditions, preferences, and postures in applied qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 60-69). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (7th ed., J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1927)
13. Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (1995). Ethical issues in qualitative research. Nursing Ethics, 2(3), 223-232.
14. Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. London: Allen and Unwin.
15. Knafl, K. A. (1994). Dialogue: Clarifying phenomenological methods. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (p. 134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Lynch-Sauer, J. (1985). Using a phenomenological research method to study nursing phenomena. In M. Leininger (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in nursing (pp. 93-107). Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
17. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)
18. Paley, J. (1997). Husserl, phenomenology and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(1), 193-197.
19. Paley, J. (1998). Misinterpreting phenomenology: Heidegger, ontology and nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(4), 817-824.
20. Robley, L. (1995). The ethics of qualitative nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(1), 45-48.
21. Silverman, H. (1987). Inscriptions: Between phenomenology and structuralism. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
22. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Canada: Althouse.