Investigating the relationship between the personality of a robotic TV assistant and the level of user control

Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 404-410

  Meerbeek, Bernt ^a   Hoonhout, Jettie ^a   Bingley, Peter ^a   Terken, Jacques ^b  

^a PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ROBOTS; THEOREM PROVING;

CONTROL CONDITIONS; INTERACTION STYLES; NATURAL LANGUAGE DIALOGUES; USER CONTROLS; USER PREFERENCES;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 34147156719     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314362     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Thrun, S. (2004). Toward a Framework for Human-Robot interaction, In: Human Computer Interaction 19, Special issue: Human Robot Interaction, 9-24
2. UNECE (2004). Press release World Robotics survey 2004. Available: http://www.unece.org/press/pr2004/04stat_p301e.pdf
3. Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., Schultz, J. (2005). Child and adults' perspectives on robot appearance, Proc. AISB'05 Symposium Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction, University of Hertfordshire, UK, 126-132
4. Norman, D. (2001). How might humans interact with robots? Available: http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/Humans_and_Robots.html
5. Reeves, B. & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places, New York: Cambridge University Press
6. Verhaegh, J. (2004). iCat, an intelligent user interface robot with character, Masters thesis, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
7. Aarts, E. & Marzano, S. (2003). The new everyday: views on ambient intelligence. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 010 Publishers
8. Dryer, D. (1999). Getting personal with computers: how to design personalities for agents, Applied artificial intelligence 13, pp. 273-295
9. Carver, C. & Scheier, M. (1995). Perspectives on personality, Boston, USA: Allyn and Bacon
10. Fong, T., Nourbaksh, I., Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 143-166
11. Severinson-Eklundh, K., Green, A., Hüttenrauch, H. (2003). Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot, Technical report IPLab-208, Interaction and Presentation Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden
12. Meerbeek, B. (2005). Design and evaluation of a robotic TV-assistant: balancing personality and control, Thesis, Stan Ackermans Instituut, Eindhoven
13. Skinner, E. (1996). A Guide to Constructs of Control, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3, 549-570
14. Hinds, P. (1998). User control and its many facets: a study of perceived control in human-computer interaction, Technical report HPL-98-154, Hewlett-Packard Lab, Palo Alto, CA, USA
15. Shneidermann, B. & Maes, P. (1997). Direct manipulation vs. interface agents, Interactions 6, 42-61
16. Parasuraman, R. & Sheridan, Th. (2000). A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation, IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics - part A: systems and humans 3, 286-297
17. Ball, G. & Breese, J. (2000). Emotion and personality in a conversational agent, In: Cassell, J. et al., Embodied conversational agents (pp. 189-219), Massachusetts: MIT press
18. Breazeal, C. (2003). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 119-155
19. Cahn, J. (1990). The generation of affect in synthesized speech, Journal of the American Voice I/O Society 8, 1-19
20. Canamero, D. & Fredslund, J. (2000). I Show You How I Like You: Human-Robot Interaction through Emotional Expression and Tactile Stimulation, Dept. of Computer Science Technical Report DAIMI PB 544, University of Aarhus, Denmark
21. Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion, American Psychologist 48, 384-392
22. Furnham, A. (1990). Language and Personality, In: Giles, H. & Robinson, W., Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, 73-95. Wiley, Chichester.
23. Gallaher, P. (1992). Individual Differences in Nonverbal Behavior: Dimensions of Style, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(1), 133-145.
24. Gill, A. & Oberlander, J. (2002). Taking Care of the Linguistic Features of Extraversion, In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 363-368.
25. Heylen, D., Van Es, I., Nijholt, A., Van Dijk, B. (2002). Experimenting with the Gaze of a Conversational Agent, Proc. International CLASS Workshop on Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems, 93-99.
26. Krahmer, E., Van Buuren, S., Ruttkay, Zs., Wesselink, W. (2003). Audio-visual personality cues for embodied agents: An experimental evaluation, In: Proceedings of the AAMAS03, Australia
27. Murray, I. & J. Arnott (1993). Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion, Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 2, 1097-1108
28. Nagao, K. & Takeuchi, A. (1994). Speech dialogue with facial displays: Multimodal human-computer conversation, Sony Computer Science Laboratory, Japan
29. Nass, C. & Brave, S. (2005). Voice Activated: How People Are Wired for Speech & How Computers Will Speak with Us, To be published as: Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship, MIT press, Cambridge, MA, USA
30. Nass, C. & Lee, K. (2000). Does Computer-Generated Speech Manifest Personality? An Experimental Test of Similarity-Attraction, In: Proceedings CHI 2000, 329-336
31. Pelachaud, C. & Poggi, I. (2002). Subtleties of facial expressions in embodied agents, Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 5, 301-312
32. Scherer, K. (1979). Personality Markers in Speech, In: Scherer, K. & Giles, H., Social markers in speech (pp. 147-209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
33. Schröder, M. (2003). Speech and Emotion Research: An Overview of Research Frameworks and a Dimensional Approach to Emotional Speech Synthesis, Dissertation, University of Saarland, Germany
34. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science 2, 186-204
35. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2, 179-211
36. Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems, Management Information Systems Quarterly 4, 695-704
37. Boeree, G. (2004). Big Five Mini Test. Available: http://www.ship.edu/ ~cgboeree/bigfiveminitest.html
38. Huang, A., Lee, F., Nass, C., Paik, Y., Swartz, L. (2001). Can Voice User Interfaces Say "I"? An Experiment with Recorded Speech and TTS, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA