High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision

Human Pathology

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 781-786

  Cardoza Favarato, Gabriella ^a   Fadare, Oluwole ^a,b  

^a WILFORD HALL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cervix; Cone biopsy; Human papillomavirus; Loop electrosurgical excision procedure; Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; Margin

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RECURRENCE; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROSURGERY; EVALUATION; EXCISION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROGNOSIS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 34147127002     PISSN: 00468177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Stoler M.H. Advances in cervical screening technology. Mod Pathol 13 (2000) 275-284
2. Mitchell M.F., Tortolero-Luna G., Wright T., et al. Cervical human papillomavirus infection and intraepithelial neoplasia: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 21 (1996) 17-25
3. Wright Jr. T.C., Cox J.T., Massad L.S., et al. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 (2003) 295-304
4. Prendiville W., Cullimore J., and Norman S. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96 (1989) 1054-1060
5. Cirisano F.D. Management of pre-invasive disease of the cervix. Semin Surg Oncol 16 (1999) 222-227
6. Cox J.T. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 353 (1999) 857-859
7. Duggan B.D., Felix J.C., Muderspach L.I., et al. Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180 (1999) 276-282
8. Gold M., Dunton C.J., Murray J., Macones G., Hanau C., and Carlson Jr. J.A. Loop electrocautery excisional procedure: therapeutic effectiveness as an ablation and a conization equivalent. Gynecol Oncol 61 (1996) 241-244
9. Mathevet P., Dargent D., Roy M., and Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 54 (1994) 175-179
10. Girardi F., Heydarfadai M., Koroschetz F., Pickel H., and Winter R. Cold-knife conization versus loop excision: histopathologic and clinical results of a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 55 (1994) 368-370
11. Soutter W.P., de Barros Lopes A., Fletcher A., et al. Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 349 (1997) 978-980
12. Lindeque B.G. Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19 (2005) 545-561
13. Sankasem A., Thavaramara T., Manusirivithaya S., and Tangjitgamol S. Tumor persistence in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive surgical margin post loop electrosurgical excision procedure. J Med Assoc Thai 89 (2006) 934-940
14. Felix J.C., Muderspach L.I., Duggan B.D., and Roman L.D. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies. Obstet Gynecol 84 (1994) 996-1000
15. Zaitoun A.M., McKee G., Coppen M.J., Thomas S.M., and Wilson P.O. Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy. J Clin Pathol 53 (2000) 191-196
16. Gardeil F., Barry-Walsh C., Prendiville W., Clinch J., and Turner M.J. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Obstet Gynecol 89 (1997) 419-422
17. Gonzalez Jr. D.I., Zahn C.M., Retzloff M.G., Moore W.F., Kost E.R., and Snyder R.R. Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184 (2001) 315-321
18. Livasy C.A., Maygarden S.J., Rajaratnam C.T., and Novotny D.B. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement. Mod Pathol 12 (1999) 233-238
19. Hulman G., Pickles C.J., Gie C.A., Dowling F.M., Stocks P.J., and Dixon R. Frequency of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following large loop excision of the transformation zone. J Clin Pathol 51 (1998) 375-377
20. Kalogirou D., Antoniou G., Karakitsos P., Botsis D., Kalogirou O., and Giannikos L. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 18 (1997) 113-116
21. Hanau C.A., and Bibbo M. The case for cytologic follow-up after LEEP. Acta Cytol 41 (1997) 731-736
22. Fan Q., Tay S.K., and Shen K. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a valuable method for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 36 (2001) 271-274
23. Zlatkov V., Mikhova A., and Kostova P. Our experience with the LEEP/LLETZ technique in the diagnostics and treatment of the precancer lesions of the uterine cervix. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 43 Suppl 4 (2004) 55-58 [In Bulgarian]
24. Murdoch J.B., Morgan P.R., Lopes A., and Monaghan J.M. Histological incomplete excision of CIN after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) merits careful follow up, not retreatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99 (1992) 990-993
25. Flannelly G., Bolger B., Fawzi H., DeLopes A.B., and Monaghan J.M. Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?. BJOG 108 (2001) 1025-1030
26. de Cabezon R.H., Sala C.V., Gomis S.S., Lliso A.R., and Bellvert C.G. Evaluation of cervical dysplasia treatment by large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). Does completeness of excision determine outcome?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 78 (1998) 83-89
27. Brockmeyer A.D., Wright J.D., Gao F., and Powell M.A. Persistent and recurrent cervical dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192 (2005) 1379-1381
28. Kucera E., Sliutz G., Czerwenka K., Breitenecker G., Leodolter S., and Reinthaller A. Is high-risk human papillomavirus infection associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia eliminated after conization by large-loop excision of the transformation zone?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 100 (2001) 72-76
29. Sarian L.O., Derchain S.F., Pitta Dda R., Morais S.S., and Rabelo-Santos S.H. Factors associated with HPV persistence after treatment for high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia with large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). J Clin Virol 31 (2004) 270-274
30. Lin C.T., Tseng C.J., Lai C.H., et al. Value of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing after conization in the prediction of residual disease in the subsequent hysterectomy specimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184 (2001) 940-945
31. Jain S., Tseng C.J., Horng S.G., Soong Y.K., and Pao C.C. Negative predictive value of human papillomavirus test following conization of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol 82 (2001) 177-180
32. Bodner K., Bodner-Adler B., Wierrani F., Kimberger O., Denk C., and Grunberger W. Is therapeutic conization sufficient to eliminate a high-risk HPV infection of the uterine cervix? A clinicopathological analysis. Anticancer Res 2 (2002) 3733-3736
33. Chao A., Lin C.T., Hsueh S., et al. Usefulness of human papillomavirus testing in the follow-up of patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 (2004) 1046-1051
34. Tate J.E., Resnick M., Sheets E.E., and Crum C.P. Absence of papillomavirus DNA in normal tissue adjacent to most cervical intraepithelial neoplasms. Obstet Gynecol 88 (1996) 257-260
35. Nagai Y., Maehama T., Asato T., and Kanazawa K. Persistence of human papillomavirus infection after therapeutic conization for CIN 3: is it an alarm for disease recurrence?. Gynecol Oncol 79 (2000) 294-299
36. Chua K.L., and Hjerpe A. Human papillomavirus analysis as a prognostic marker following conization of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol 66 (1997) 108-113
37. Negri G., Gampenrieder J., Vigl E.E., Haitel A., Menia E., and Mian C. Human papillomavirus typing at large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix uteri. Anticancer Res 23 (2003) 4289-4292
38. Jakus S., Edmonds P., Dunton C., and King S.A. Margin status and excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 55 (2000) 520-527