A method for the production of simulation models with application to web interaction paradigms

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 605-620

  D'Ambrogio, Andrea ^a   Iazeolla, Giuseppe ^a   Pasini, Leonardo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMERINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Client server; Interaction paradigms; Mobile agents; Object oriented simulation; Simulation model production; Web applications

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOBILE AGENTS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; SERVERS;

CLIENT-SERVER; INTERACTION PARADIGMS; OBJECT-ORIENTED SIMULATION; SIMULATION MODEL PRODUCTION; WEB APPLICATIONS;

INTERNET;

EID: 34147118556     PISSN: 1569190X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2004.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Smith C.U. Performance Engineering of Software Systems (1992), Addison Wesley
2. Cortellessa V., D'Ambrogio A., and Iazeolla G. Automatic derivation of software performance models from CASE documents. Performance Evaluation Journal 45 2-3 (2001)
3. D'Ambrogio A., and Iazeolla G. Steps towards the automatic production of performance models of web applications. Computer Networks 41 1 (2003)
4. Fuggetta A., Picco G.P., and Vigna G. Understanding code mobility. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24 5 (1998)
5. Heidemann J., Obraczka K., and Touch J. Modeling the performance of HTTP over several transport protocols. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 5 5 (1997)
6. Fielding R., Irvine U.C., Gettys J., Mogul J.C., Frystyk H., Masinter L., Leach P., and Berners-Lee T. Hypertext transfer protocol - HTTP/1.1. Internet Request for Comments RFC 2616 June (1999)
7. Woodside M., Hrischuk C., Selic B., and Bayarov S. Automated performance modeling of software generated by a design environment. Performance Evaluation Journal 45 2-3 (2001)
8. L.B. Arief, N.A. Speirs, A UML tool for an automatic generation of simulation programs, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP'00), Ottawa (Canada), September 2000.
9. S. Balsamo, M. Marzolla, A. Di Marco, P. Inverardi, Experimenting different software architectures performance techniques: a case study, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP'04), Redwood City, California (USA), January 2004.
10. Carzaniga A., Picco G.P., and Vigna G. Designing distributed applications with mobile code paradigms. In: Taylor R. (Ed). Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'97) (1997), ACM Press 22-32
11. G.P. Gu, D.C. Petriu, Early evaluation of software performance based on the UML performance profile, in: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies Conference on Collaborative Research (CASCON'03), Toronto (Canada), October 2003.
12. M. Merz, W. Lamersdorf, Agents, services, and electronic markets: how do they integrate? in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Platforms, IFIPIEEE, 1996.
13. D. Gotta, G. Cico, Performance evaluation in a open system environment, in: Proceedings Convention Unix, Milano, Italy, 1993.
14. C. Hrischuk, J. Rolia, C.M. Woodside, Automatic generation of a software performance model using an object-oriented prototype, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS'95), 1995, pp. 399-409.
15. Y. Wang, Performance evaluation of UML models via automatically generated simulation models, M.S. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2003.
16. T. Cai, P. Gloor, S. Nog, DataFlow: a workflow management system on the web using transportable agents, Technical Report TR96-283, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1996.
17. P. Knudsen, Comparing two distributed computing paradigms: a performance case study, M.S. Thesis, University of Tromso, 1995.
18. Simulog, qnap2 Reference Manual, version 9.3.
19. Simulog, modline/arch Reference Manual, version 3.0.
20. Imagine That Inc., Extend, .
21. Rockwell Software, Arena, .
22. Swarm Development Group, Swarm simulation package, .