Extremely low frequency weak magnetic fields enhance resistance of NN tobacco plants to tobacco mosaic virus and elicit stress-related biochemical activities

Bioelectromagnetics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 214-223

  Trebbi, Grazia ^a   Borghini, Francesco ^b   Lazzarato, Lisa ^a   Torrigiani, Patrizia ^a   Calzoni, G Lorenzo ^a   Betti, Lucietta ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^c NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Extremely low frequency magnetic field; Induced resistance; Ornithine decarboxylase; Phenylalanine ammonia lyase; Tobacco mosaic virus

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; AMMONIA; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; PLANTS (BOTANY); VIRUSES;

EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCIES; EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELDS; HYPERSENSITIVE RESPONSE; INDUCED RESISTANCE; LYASE ACTIVITY; ORNITHINE DECARBOXYLASE; PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA-LYASE; PLANT MODEL; TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS; TOBACCO PLANTS;

TOBACCO;

ORNITHINE DECARBOXYLASE; PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA LYASE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPOSURE; HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTION; MAGNETIC FIELD; NONHUMAN; PLANT MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; STRESS; TOBACCO; TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS; VIRUS RESISTANCE;

NICOTIANA OBTUSIFOLIA; NICOTIANA TABACUM; TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS;

EID: 34147110764     PISSN: 01978462     EISSN: 1521186X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20296     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adey WR. 1993. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 51:410-416.
2. Agrios GN. 2005. Plant Pathology (fifth edition). San Diego, California: Elsevier Academic Press. p 237-242.
3. Amyan A, Ayrapetyan S. 2004. The biological effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and vibrations on barley seeds hydration and germination. Scientific World J 4(S2):55-69.
4. + efflux and extracellular alkalization in soybean cells carrying the disease resistance gene Rpg 4. Plant Physiol 112:297-302.
5. Bauréus Koch CLM, Sommarin M, Persson BRR, Salford LG, Eberhardt JL. 2003. Interaction between low frequency magnetic fields and cell membranes. Bioelectromagnetics 24:395-402.
6. Baztan J, Torres M. 1988. The effects of daily exposure to UV-A light on phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity during the growth of barley plants. Rev Esp Physiol 44:73-79.
7. 2 resistance genes in tomato. Phytopath Medit 36:24-30.
8. Bhatnagar P, Glasheen BM, Bains SK, Long SL, Minocha R, Walter C, Minocha SC. 2001. Transgenic manipulation of the metabolism of polyamines in poplar cells. Plant Physiol 125:2139-2153.
9. Biondi S, Franchin C, Fossati T, Pasquini E, Ziosi V, Torrigiani P, Castiglione S. 2005. Effetti di zinco e rame sull'espressione genica delle metallotioneine e sul contenuto di poliammine di Populus alba L. in micropropagazione. Informatore Botanico Italiano 37:698-699.
10. Bouchereau A, Aziz A, Larher F, Martin-Tanguy J. 1999. Polyamines and environmental challenges: Recent development. Plant Sci 140:103-125.
11. Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 78:248-254.
12. Celestino C, Picazo ML, Toribio M. 2000. Influence of chronic exposure to an electromagnetic field on germination and early growth of Quercus suber seeds: Preliminary study. Electro Magnetobiol 19:115-120.
13. Cherry N. 2002. Schumann Resonances, a plausible biophysical mechanism for the human health effects of Solar/Geomagnetic Activity. Natural Hazards 26:279-331.
14. Cohen SS. 1998. A guide to the polyamines. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
15. Davis MS. 1996. Effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic fields on early growth in three plant species and a replication of previous results. Bioelectromagnetics 17:154-161.
16. Dicko MH, Gruppen H, Barro C, Traore AS, van Berkel WJH, Voragen AGJ. 2005. Impact of phenolic compounds and related enzymes in sorghum varieties for resistance and susceptibility to biotic and abiotic stresses. J Chem Ecol 31:2671-2688.
17. Dixon RA, Paiva NL. 1995. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7:1085-1097.
18. Durrant WE, Dong X. 2004. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:185-209.
19. Fischer G, Tausz M, Kock M, Grill D. 2004. Effects of weak 162/3 Hz magnetic fields on growth parameters of young sunflower and wheat seedlings. Bioelectromagnetics 25:638-641.
20. Fraser RSS, Gerwitz A. 1985. A new physical assay method for tobacco mosaic virus using a radioactive virus recovery standard and the first derivative of the ultraviolet absorption spectrum. J Virol Methods 11:289-298.
21. Galland P, Pazur A. 2005. Magnetoreception in plants. J Plant Res 118:371-389.
22. Gartzke J, Lange K. 2002. Cellular target of weak magnetic fields: Ionic conduction along actin filaments of microvilli. Am J Physiol-cell Ph 283:C1333-C1346.
23. Groppa MD, Benavides MP, Tomaro ML. 2003. Polyamine metabolism in sunflower and wheat leaf disc under cadmium or copper stress. Plant Sci 164:293-299.
24. Kobayashi M, Soda N, Miyo T, Ueda Y. 2004. Effects of combined DC and AC magnetic fields on germination of hornwort seeds. Bioelectromagnetics 25:552-559.
25. Kombrink E, Schmelzer E. 2001. The hypersensitive response and its role in local and systemic disease resistance. Eur J Plant Pathol 107:69-78.
26. Lamari L. 2002. Assess: Image analysis software for plant disease quantification. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: APS Press.
27. Lawton MA, Lamb CJ. 1987. Transcriptional activation of plant defence genes by fungal elicitor, wounding and infection. Mol Cell Biol 7:335-341.
28. Lee J, Rudd JJ. 2002. Calcium-dependent protein kinases: Versatile plant signalling components necessary for pathogen defence. Trends Plant Sc 7:97-98.
29. Li MY, Lan WZ, Chen C, Yu LJ. 2003. The effects of oligosaccharide and spores from Aspergillus niger on the defence responses of Taxus chinensis leaves in vitro. Phytopathology 151:540-545.
30. Liburdy RP. 1992. Calcium signaling in lymphocytes and ELF fields. Evidence for a field metric and a site of interaction involving the calcium ion channel. FEBS Lett 301:53-59.
31. Liburdy RP, Callahan DE, Harland J, Dunham E, Sloma TR, Yasween P. 1993. Experimental evidence for 60Hz magnetic fields operating through the signal transduction cascade. FEBS Lett 334:301-308.
32. Litovitz TA, Krause D, Montrose CJ, Mullins JM. 1994. Temporally incoherent magnetic fields mitigate the response of biological systems to temporally coherent magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 15:399-409.
33. Marathe R, Anandalakshmi R, Liu Y, Dinesh-Kumar SP. 2002. The tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene. N Mol Plant Pathol 3:167-172.
34. Marini F, Betti L, Scaramagli S, Biondi S, Torrigiani P. 2001. Polyamine metabolism is upregulated in response to tobacco mosaic virus in hypersensitive, but not susceptible, tobacco. New Phytol 149:301-309.
35. Mevissen M, Haussler M, Losher W. 1999. Alterations in ornithine decarboxylase activity in the rat mammary gland after different periods of 50 Hz magnetic fields exposure. Bioelectromagnetics 20:338-346.
36. Monselise EBI, Parola AH, Kost D. 2003. Low-frequency electromagnetic fields induce a stress effect upon higher plants, as evident by the universal stress signal, alanine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 302:427-434.
37. Muraji M, Asai T, Tatebe W. 1998. Primary root growth rate of Zea mays seedlings grown in alternating magnetic field of different frequencies. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 44:271-273.
38. Pazur A, Scheer H. 1992. The growth of freshwater green algae in weak alternating magnetic fields of 7.8 Hz frequency. Z Naturforsch 47c:690-694.
39. Pellegrini L, Rohfritsch O, Friting B, Legrand M. 1994. Phenylalanina ammonia-lyase in tobacco. Molecular cloning and gene expression during the hypersensitive reaction to tobacco mosaic virus and the response to a fungal elicitor. Plant Physiol 106:877-886.
40. Phirke PS, Kubde AB, Umbarkar SP. 1996. The influence of magnetic field on plant growth. Seed Sci Technol 24:375-392.
41. Piacentini MP, Fraternale D, Piatti E, Ricci D, Vetrano F, Dacha' M, Accorsi A. 2001. Senescence delay and change of antioxidant enzyme levels in Cucumis sativus L. etiolated seedlings by ELF magnetic fields. Plant Sci 161:45-53.
42. Piacentini MP, Piatti E, Fraternale D, Ricci D, Albertini MC, Accorsi A. 2004. Phospholipase C-dependent phosphoinositide breakdown induced by ELF-EMF in Peganum harmala calli. Biochimie 86:343-349.
43. Picazo ML, Martinez E, Carbonell MV, Ray A, Amaya JM, Bardasano JL. 1999. Inhibition in the growth of thistles (Cynara cardunculus L.) and lentils (Lens culinaris L.) due to chronic exposure to 50 Hz, 15 μT electromagnetic fields. Electro Magnetobiol 18:147-156.
44. Rabiti AI, Betti L, Bortolotti C, Marini F, Canova A, Bagni N, Torrigiani P. 1998. Short-term polyamine response in TMV-inoculated hypersensitive and susceptible tobacco plants. New Phytol 139:549-553.
45. Ross AF. 1961a. Localized acquired resistance to plant virus infection in hypersensitive hosts. Virology 14:329-339.
46. Ross AF. 1961b. Systemic acquired resistance induced in localized virus infections in plants. Virology 14:340-358.
47. Ruzic R, Jerman I. 2002. Weak magnetic field decreases heat stress in cress seedlings. Electromagnetic Biol Med 21:69-80.
48. Ruzic R, Jerman I, Jeglic A, Fefer D. 1993. Various effects of pulsed and static magnetic fields on the development of Castanea sativa Mill in tissue culture. Electro Magnetobiol 12:165-177.
49. Ruzic R, Jerman I, Gogala N. 1998. Effects of weak low-frequency magnetic fields on spruce seed germination under acid conditions. Can J Forest Res 28:609-616.
50. Seo S, Okamotoc M, Iwaia T, Iwanod M, Fukuie K, Isogaid A, Nakajimaf N, Ohashiet Y. 2000. Reduced levels of chloroplast FtsH protein in tobacco mosaic virus-infected tobacco leaves accelerate the hypersensitive response. Plant Cell 12:917-932.
51. Stange BC, Rowland RE, Rapley BI, Podd JV. 2002. ELF magnetic field increase amino acid uptake into Vicia Faba L. roots and alter ion movement across the plasma membrane. Bioelectromagnetics 23:347-354.
52. Takahashi Y, Berberich T, Miyazaki A, Seo S, Ohashi Y, Kusano T. 2003. Spermine signalling in tobacco: Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases by spermine is mediated through mitocondrial dysfunction. Plant J 36:820-829.
53. Torrigiani P, Rabiti AL, Bortolotti G, Betti L, Marani F, Canova A, Bagni N. 1997. Polyamine synthesis and accumulation in the hypersensitive response to TMV in Nicotiana tabacum. New Phytol 135:467-473.
54. van Buuren ML, Guidi L, Fornalè S, Ghetti F, Franceschetti M, Soldatini GF, Bagni N. 2002. Ozone-response mechanisms in tobacco: Implications of polyamine metabolism. New Phytol 156:389-398.
55. van Loon LC. 2000. Systemic induced resistance. In: Slusarenko A, Fraser RSS, van Loon LC, editors. Mechanisms of resistance to plant diseases. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 521-574.
56. Van Regenmortel MHV, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL, Carstens EB, Estes MK, Lemon SM, Maniloff J, Mayo MA, McGeoch DJ, Pringle CR, Wickner RB, editors. 2000. Virus taxonomy. Classification and nomenclature of virus. San Diego: Academic Press.
57. Walters DR. 2003. Resistance to plant pathogens: Possible roles for free polyamines and polyamine catabolism. New Phytol 159:109-115.
58. 2 uptake and early growth of radish seedlings. Bioelectromagnetics 25:572-581.
59. Zhadin MN. 2001. Review of Russian literature on biological action of DC and low-frequency AC magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 22:27-45.