Sound and fury, signifying nothing? Future directions in the nature-nurture debate

International Journal of Sport Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 135-143

  Baker, Joseph ^a,c   Davids, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147105589     PISSN: 00470767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abernethy, B., Neal, R. J., & Koning, P. (1994). Visual-perceptual and cognitive differences between expert, intermediate, and novice snooker players. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 185-211.
2. Baker, J. & Davids, K. (2006). Genetic and environmental constraints on variability in sport performance. In K. Davids, S. J. Bennett & K. M. Newell (Eds.), Movement System Variability (pp. 185-198). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
3. Boomsma, D., Busjahn, A., & Peltonen, L. (2002). Classical twin studies and beyond. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 872-882.
4. Cronbach, L. J. (1991). Emerging views on methodology. In T. D. Wachs & R. Plomin (Eds.) Conceptualization and measurement of organism-environment interaction. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35, 125-129.
6. Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G., & Faloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a memory skill. Science, 208, 1181-1182.
7. Haas, C.S., Creighton, C.J., Xiujun, P., Maine, L, Koch, A., Haines III, G., Ling S., Chinnaiyan,A. & Holoshitz, J. (2006). Identification of genes modulated in Rheumatoid Arthritis using complementary DNA microarray analysis of Lymphoblastoid B cell lines from disease-discordant monozygotic twins. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 54, 2047-2060.
8. Joseph, J. (2003). The gene illusion: Genetic research in psychiatry and psychology under the microscope. Ross-on-Wye, UK: PCCS Books.
9. Kovas, Y. & Plomin R. (2006). Generalist genes: Implications for the cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 198-203.
10. Kimble, G. A. (1993). Evolution of the nature-nurture issue in the history of psychology (pp. 3-25). In R. Plomin & G. E. McClearn (Eds.) Nature, nurture and psychology, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Lewontin, R.C. (2000). It ain't necessarily so: The dream of the human genome and other illusions. New York: New York Review Books
12. Marcus, G.F. & Rabagliati, H. (in press). Genes and domain specificity. Trends in Cognitive Science.
13. Mayr, E. (2001). What evolution is. New York: Basic Books.
14. Plomin, R., Fulker, D.W., Corley, R., & DeFries, J.C. (1997). Nature, nurture and cognitive development from 1 to 16 years: A parent-offspring adoption study. Psychological Science, 8, 442-447.
15. Wahlsten, D. (1990). Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interactions [with commentary]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 109-162.
16. Wolfarth, B., Bray, M.S., Hagberg, J.M., Perusse, L., Rauramaa, R. et al. (2005). The human gene map for performance and health-related fitness phenotypes: the 2004 update. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 37, 881-903.