Glaucoma screening: Analysis of conventional and telemedicine-friendly devices

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 237-243

  Kumar, Sajeesh ^a   Giubilato, Antonio ^a   Morgan, William ^a   Jitskaia, Ludmila ^a   Barry, Chris ^a   Bulsara, Max ^b   Constable, Ian J ^a   Yogesan, Kanagasingam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b LIONS EYE INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Screening; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIGITAL IMAGING; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPHTHALMOSCOPE; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PATIENT MONITORING; PERIMETER; RURAL AREA; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TELEMEDICINE; TONOMETER; VISUAL FIELD;

AGED; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; RURAL POPULATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TELEMEDICINE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISION DISORDERS; VISION SCREENING; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 34147105054     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: 14429071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01457.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 262-7.
2. Kumar S, Yogesan K, Constable IJ. Should telemedicine in eye care be funded in Australia? Med J Aust 2004; 181: 583.
3. Kumar S, Yogesan K. Internet-based eye care: Vision 2020. Lancet 2005; 366: 1244-5.
4. Yogesan K, Kumar S, Constable IJ. Tele-glaucoma: Use of digital devices and web-based system for screening and detection of glaucoma. Telemed J E Health 2004; 10: 45-7.
5. Fleming C, Whitlock E, Beil T, Smit B, Harris R. Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma in the primary care setting: An update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 167-70.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-60.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986, 307-10.
8. Mitchell P, Lee AJ. Open-angle glaucoma and systemic hypertension: The Blue Mountains eye study. J Glaucoma 2004; 13: 319-26.
9. Weih LM, Nanjan M. Prevalence and predictors of open-angle glaucoma: results from the visual impairment project. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1966-72.
10. Kumar S, Mei-Ling TK, Constable IJ, Yogesan K. Internet based ophthalmology service: Impact assessment. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1382-3.
11. Tuulonen A, Ohinmaa A, Alanko HI et al. The application of teleophthalmology in examining patients with glaucoma: A pilot study. J Glaucoma 1999; 8: 367-73.
12. Li HK, Tang RA, Oschner K et al. Telemedicine screening of glaucoma. Telemed J 1999; 5: 283-90.
13. Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Barry CJ et al. Evaluation of portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1999; 8: 297-301.
14. Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Eikelboom RH, van Saarloos PP. Tele-ophthalmic screening using digital imaging devices. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1998; 26 (Suppl. 1): S9-11.
15. Harper RA, Reeves BC. Glaucoma screening: The importance of combining test data. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 537-43.
16. Michelson G, Groh MJ. Screening models for glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2001; 12: 105-11.
17. Paul H, Alvine KF, Demosthenes P. Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma in the developed world: Are we there yet? Can J Ophthalmol 2005; 40: 477-86.
18. Quigley HA, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A. Rate of progression in open-angle glaucoma estimated from cross-sectional prevalence of visual field damage. Am J Ophthalmol 1996; 122: 355-63.
19. Bayer AU, Erb C. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1009-17.
20. Yamada N, Chen PP, Mills RP et al. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 1479-84.
21. Tribble JR, Schultz RO, Robinson JC, Rothe TL. Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 740-5.
22. Thomas R, Bhat S, Muliyil JP et al. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 46-50.
23. Tatemichi M, Nakano T, Tanaka K et al. Laterality of the performance of glaucoma mass screening using frequency-doubling technology. J Glaucoma 2003; 12: 221-5.
24. Quaranta GM, Vetrugno M, Trabucco T, Cantatore F, Cardia L. The role of frequency doubling technology (FDT) in glaucoma screening. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000; 78 (Suppl. 232): 21-3.
25. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 863-71.
26. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 357-63.
27. Sponsel WE, Arango S, Trigo Y, Mensah J. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125: 830-6.
28. Soliman MAE, De Jong LAMS, Ismaeil A et al. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 444-54.
29. Maeda H, Tanaka Y, Nakamura M, Yamamoto M. Blue-on yellow perimetry using an Armaly glaucoma screening program. Ophthalmologica 1999; 213: 71-5.
30. Mansberger SL, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA et al. Predictive value of frequency doubling technology perimetry for detecting glaucoma in a developing country. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 128-34.
31. Cioffi GA, Mansberger S, Spry P et al. Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000; 98: 195-202.
32. American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Committee Glaucoma Panel. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, Limited Revision. 2003. Accessed 18 Feb 2007. Available from: http://www.aao.org/aao/education/ library/ppp/upload/Primary-Open-Angle-Glaucoma_.pdf
33. Jackson C, Bullock J, Pitt M et al. Screening for glaucoma in a Brisbane general practice - the role of tonometry. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1995; 23: 173-8.
34. Rezaie T, Child A, Hitchings R et al. Adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin. Science 2002; 295: 1077-9.
35. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 701-13.
36. Moseley MJ, Thompson JR, Deutsch J et al. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation. Eye 1993; 7: 127-30.
37. Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Lee AJ, Wang JJ. Bias in self-reported family history and relationship to glaucoma: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2002; 9: 333-45.
38. Harris R. Screening for glaucoma. Waiting until our vision clears. BMJ 2005; 331: E376-7.
39. Maier PC, Funk J, Schwarzer G et al. Treatment of ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005; 331: 134.
40. Guirguis J. Rationale for the USPSTF recommendation on screening for glaucoma. Am Fam Physician 2005; 72: 1184, 1187.
41. Thomas R, Kumar RS, Chandrasekhar G, Parikh R. Applying the recent clinical trials on primary open angle glaucoma: The developing world perspective. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 324-7.
42. Muller A, Vu HT, Ferraro JG, Keeffe JE, Taylor HR. Rapid and cost-effective method to assess vision disorders in a population. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006; 34: 521-5.
43. Quigley HA. Current and future approaches to glaucoma screening. J Glaucoma 1998; 7: 210-20.
44. Johannesson G, Gudmundsdottir GJ, Linden C. Can the prevalence of open-angle glaucoma be estimated from a retrospective clinical material? A study on the west coast of Iceland. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005; 83: 549-53.
45. Grodum K, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. A comparison of glaucoma patients identified through mass screening and in routine clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002; 80: 627-31.