Outdated and incomplete: A review of thyroid cancer on the World Wide Web

Thyroid

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 259-265

  Air, Mamie ^a   Roman, Sanziana A ^a   Yeo, Heather ^a   Maser, Christina ^a   Trapasso, Tara ^a   Kinder, Barbara ^a   Sosa, Julie Ann ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADVERTIZING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONSUMER; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STUDENT T TEST; TECHNOLOGY; THYROID CANCER; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; PATIENT EDUCATION; THYROID NEOPLASMS;

EID: 34147103365     PISSN: 10507256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2006.0300     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi 2006 Medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules Endocr Pract 12:63-102.
2. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. 2005 Cancer statistics 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55:10-30.
3. Ansani NT, Vogt M, Henderson BA, McKaveney TP, Weber RJ, Smith RB, Burda M, Kwoh CK, Osial TA, Starz T 2005 Quality of arthritis information on the Internet. Am J Health Syst Pharm 62:1184-1189.
4. Boberg E, Hawkins R, Gustafson DH 1995 Development, acceptance, and use patterns of a computer-based education and social support system for people living with AIDS/HIV infection. Computers in Human Behavior 11:289-311.
5. Legare F, O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Saucier D, Cote L, Blais J, Cauchon M, Pare L 2003 The effect of decision aids on the agreement between women's and physicians' decisional conflict about hormone replacement therapy. Patient Educ Couns 50:211-221.
6. Stalmeier PF, Roosmalen MS, Verhoef LC, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Oosterwijk JC, Moog U, Hoogerbrugge N, van Daal WA 2005 The decision evaluation scales. Patient Educ Couns 57:286-293.
7. Ford P 2000 Is the Internet changing the relationship between consumers and practitioners? J Healthc Qual 22: 41-43.
8. Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK 2003 Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 289:2400-2406.
9. Wirtz V, Cribb A, Barber N 2006 Patient-doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation-a critical analysis of models. Soc Sci Med 62:116-124.
10. McRoy SW, Liu-Perez A, Ali SS 1998 Interactive computerized health care education. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5:347-356.
11. Ruland CM, Bakken S 2002 Developing, implementing, and evaluating decision support systems for shared decision making in patient care: a conceptual model and case illustration. J Biomed Inform 35:313-321.
12. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, Wensing M, Wilkinson C, Kinnersley P, Grol R 2001 Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns 43:5-22.
13. Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH 2004 Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention: a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med 26:56-66.
14. Esquivel A, Meric-Bernstam F, Bernstam EV 2006 Accuracy and self correction of information received from an internet breast cancer list: content analysis. BMJ 332:939-942.
15. Pautler SE, Tan JK, Dugas GR, Pus N, Ferri M, Hardie WR, Chin JL 2001 Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. Urology 57:230-233.
16. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA 1997 Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor-let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277:1244-1245.
17. Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, White J, Andrews K, Kennett RL, DeAngelis CD, Musacchio RA 2000 Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: Principles governing AMA web sites. JAMA 283:1600-1606.
18. Ambre J, Guard R, Perveiler FM, Renner J, Rippen H 1997 Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the internet. Available at: http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/docs/ criteria.html. Accessed 23 May 2001.
19. Bath PA, Bouchier H 2003 Development and application of a tool designed to evaluate web sites providing information on alzheimer's disease. Journal of Information Science 29: 279-297.
20. Sullivan D Nielsen NetRatings Search Engine Ratings. Available at: http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/print. php/34701_2156451. Accessed 27 July 2005.
21. Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Maxfield A 1999 Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. BMJ 318:647-649.
22. Jadad AR, Gagliardi A 1998 Rating health information on the Internet navigating to knowledge or to babel? JAMA 279:611-614.
23. Jadad AR, Haynes RB, Hunt D, Browman GP 2000 The Internet and evidence-based decision-making: a needed synergy for efficient knowledge management in health care. Can Med Assoc J 162:362-365.
24. Eysenbach G, Jadad AR 2001 Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age. J Med Internet Res 3(2):el9.
25. Singer PA, Cooper DS, Daniels GH, Ladenson PW, Greenspan FS, Levy EG, Braverman LE, Clark OH, McDougall IR, Ain KB, Dorfman SG 1996 Treatment guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and well-differentiated thyroid cancer. American Thyroid Association. Arch Intern Med 156:2165-2172.
26. Wills CE, Holmes-Rovner M 2003 Patient comprehension of information for shared treatment decision making: State of the art and future directions. Patient Educ Couns 50:285-290.
27. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Munoz JA, Puyol JA, Lara M, Watkins KE, Yang H, McGlynn EA 2001 Health information on the internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 285:2612-2621.