Progress in dialectometry: Toward explanation

Literary and Linguistic Computing

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 387-397

  Nerbonne, John ^a   Kretzschmar Jr , William ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047243205     PISSN: 02681145     EISSN: 14774615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fql034     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barbiers, S., Cornips, L., and van de Kleij, S. (eds), (2001). Syntactic Microvariation. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute, elec. publication.
2. Barbiers, S. et al. (eds) (2006). Dynamic Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects (DynaSAND). Amsterdam: Meertens Institute, http://www.meertens.nl/sand/
3. Black, P. (1976). Multidimensional scaling applied to linguistic relationships. In Dyen, I. and Jucquois, G. (eds), Lexicostatistics in Genetic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Montreal Conference, Vol. 3/5-6 of Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain. Leuven: Centre de Recherches Mathematiques Université de Montreal, pp. 43-92.
4. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1996). Gènes, peuples et langues. Paris: Jacob.
5. Cavalli-Sforza, L. and W. S.-Y. Wang. (1986). 'Spatial distance and lexical replacement.' Language, 62: 38-55.
6. 11980]). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
8. Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Dunn, A. M., Terrill, A., Reesink G., and Levinson, S. (2005). Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science, 309(5743): 2072-75.
10. Goebl, H. (1982). Dialektometrie: Prinzipien und Methoden des Einsatzes der Numerischen Taxonomie im Bereich der Dialektgeographie. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
11. Goebl, H. (1984). Dialektometrische Studien: Anhand italoromanischer, rätoromanischer und galloromanischer Sprachmaterialien aus AIS und ALF. Vol. 3 Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
12. Gooskens, C. and Heeringa, W. (2004). Perceptual evaluation of levenshtein dialect distance measurements using norwegian dialect data. Language Variation and Change, 16(3): 189-207.
13. Kruskal, J. B., Dyen, I., and Black, P. (1971). Some results from the vocabulary method of reconstructing languages trees. In Lexico-Statistics in Genetic Linguistics. New Haven: Yale University.
14. Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1, Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Labov, W., Ash, S., and Boberg, C. (2005). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change: A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. Longobardi, G. (2003). Methods in parametric linguistics and cognitive history. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 3:103-40.
17. McMahon, A. and McMahon, R. (2005). Language Classication by the Numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Milroy, L. and Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Nerbonne, J. and Kretzschmar, W. (2003). Introducing computational methods in dialectometry. Computers and the Humanities, 37(3):245-55. Special issue on computational methods in dialectometry, Nerbonne, J. and Kretzschmar, W.I.,Jr. (eds).
20. 11999]). Einführung in die Dialektologie des Deutschen, 2te, neubearbeitete Auflage. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
21. Renfrew, C. (1992). Archaeology, genetics and linguistic diversity. Man, 27(3): 445-78.
22. Séguy, J. (1971). La relation entre la distance spatiale et la distance lexicale. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 35(138): 335-57.
23. Séguy, J. (1973). La dialectometrie dans l'Atlas linguistique de Gascogne. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 37(145): 1-24.
24. Shackleton, R. G.Jr (2005). English-American speech relationships: a quantitative approach. Journal of English Linguistics, 33(2): 99-160.