Authorship attribution for electronic documents

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 222, Issue , 2006, Pages 119-130

  Juola, Patrick ^a  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship attribution; Stylometrics; Text forensics

Indexed keywords

AUTHORSHIP ATTRIBUTION; BEST PRACTICE; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT; ERROR TYPES; FORENSIC ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE METHODS; PORTABLE SOFTWARE; STATE OF THE ART;

ELECTRONIC CRIME COUNTERMEASURES; WORD PROCESSING;

COMPUTER CRIME;

EID: 34047224691     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-36891-7-10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. S. Argamon and S. Levitan, Measuring the usefulness of function words for authorship attribution, Proceedings of the Joint International Conference of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities, 2005.
2. R. Baayen, H. van Halteren, A. Neijt and F. Tweedie, An experiment in authorship attribution, Proceedings of JADT 2002: Sixth International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis, pp. 29-37, 2002.
3. J. Burrows, Word-patterns and story-shapes: The statistical analysis of narrative style, Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol.2, pp. 61-70, 1987.
4. J . Burrows, "an ocean where each kind... :" Statistical analysis and some major determinants of literary style, Computers and the Humanities, vol.23(4-5), pp. 309-321, 1989.
5. J. Burrows, Questions of authorships: Attribution and beyond, Computers and the Humanities, vol.37(1), pp. 5-32, 2003.
6. C. Chaski, Who's at the keyboard: Authorship attribution in digital evidence invesigations, International Journal of Digital Evidence, vol.4(1), 2005.
7. G. Easson, The linguistic implications of shibboleths, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association, 2002.
8. J. Farringdon, Analyzing for Authorship: A Guide to the Cusum Technique, University of Wales Press, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 1996.
9. R. Forsyth, Towards a text benchmark suite , Proceedings of the Joint International Conference of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities, 1997.
10. D. Holmes, Authorship attribution, Computers and the Humanities, vol.28(2), pp. 87-106, 1994.
11. D. Hoover, Delta prime? Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol.19(4), pp. 477-495, 2004.
12. P. Juola, The time course of language change, Computers and the Humanities, vol.37(1), pp. 77-96, 2003. (Pubitemid 44966855)
13. P. Juola, Ad-hoc authorship attribution competition, Proceedings of the Joint International Conference of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities, 2004.
14. P. Juola, On composership attribution, Proceedings of the Joint International Conference of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities, 2004.
15. P. Juola, Becoming Jack London, to appear in Journal of Quantitative Linguistics.
16. P. Juola and H. Baayen, A controlled-corpus experiment in authorship attribution by cross-entropy, Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol.20, pp. 59-67, 2005. (Pubitemid 43118787)
17. P. Juola, J. Sofko and P. Brennan, A prototype for authorship attribution studies, to appear in Literary and Linguistic Computing, 2006.
18. V. Kesel] and N. Cercone, CNG method with weighted voting, presented at the Joint International Conference of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities, 2004.
19. M. Koppel and J. Schler, Ad-hoc authorship attribution competition approach outline, presented at the Joint International Conference of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities, 2004.
20. H. Kucera and W. Francis, Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English, Brown University Press, Providence, Rhode Island, 1967.
21. O. Kukushkina, A. Polikarpov and D. Khmelev, Using literal and grammatical statistics for authorship attribution, Problemy Peredachi Informatii, vol.37(2), pp. 96-198, 2000;
22. Translated in Problems of Information Transmission, MAIK Naukajlnterperiodica, Moscow, Russia, pp. 172-184, 2000.
23. T. Merriam, An application of authorship attribution by intertextual distance in English, Corpus, vol.2, 2003.
24. J. Rudman, The state of authorship attribution studies: Some problems and solutions, Computers and the Humanities, vol.31, pp. 351-365, 1998. (Pubitemid 128784716)
25. E. Stamatatos, N. Fakotakis and G. Kokkinakis, Automatic authorship attribution, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 158-164, 1999.
26. Supreme Court of the United States, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579, no.92-102, 1993.
27. H. van Halteren, R. Baayen, F. Tweedie, M. Haverkort and A. Neijt, New machine learning methods demonstrate the existence of a human stylome, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, vol.12(1), pp. 65-77, 2005.
28. F. Wellman, The Art of Cross-Examination, MacMillan, New York, 1936.