Spatial relationship of source localizations in patients with focal epilepsy: Comparison of MEG and EEG with a three spherical shells and a boundary element volume conductor model

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 315-322

  Scheler, Gabriela ^a   Fischer, Michael J M ^a   Genow, Alexandra ^a   Hummel, Cornelia ^a   Rampp, Stefan ^a   Paulini, Andrea ^a   Hopfengärtner, Rüdiger ^a   Kaltenhäuser, Martin ^a   Stefan, Hermann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Equivalent current dipole; Focal epilepsy; Magnetoencephalography; Source localization; Volume conductor

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD VOLUME CONDUCTOR MODEL; BRAIN MAPPING; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIPOLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPTIC DISCHARGE; EPILEPTIC FOCUS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOCAL EPILEPSY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; TEMPORAL LOBE EPILEPSY; THREE SPHERICAL SHELLS VOLUME CONDUCTOR MODEL;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSIES, PARTIAL; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PREOPERATIVE CARE;

EID: 34047198733     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20277     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barkley GL (2004): Controversies in neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in localization of interictal epileptiform activity. Prog Clin Neurophysiol 115:1001-1009.
2. Cohen D, Cuffin BN (1991): EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment. Brain Topogr 4:95-103.
3. Crouzeix A, Yvert B, Bertrand O, Pernier J (1999): An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG. Clin Neurophysiol 110:2176-2188.
4. Cuffin BN, Schomer DL, Ives JR, Blume H (2001a): Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in realistically shaped head models. Clin Neurophysiol 112:2288-2292.
5. Cuffin BN, Schomer DL, Ives JR, Blume H (2001b): Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in spherical head models. Clin Neurophysiol 112:46-51.
6. de Jongh A, de Munck JC, Goncalves SI, Ossenblok P (2005): Differences in MEG/EEG epileptic spike yields explained by regional differences in signal-to-noise ratios. J Clin Neurophysiol 22:153-158.
7. Ebersole JS (1996): New applications of EEG/MEG in epilepsy evaluation. Epilepsy Res Suppl 11:227-237.
8. Fischer MJM, Scheler G, Stefan H (2005): Utilization of magnetoencephalography results to obtain favourable outcomes in epilepsy surgery. Brain 128:153-157.
9. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Wischmann HA, Kohler T, Theissen A, Drenckhahn R, Buchner H (1998): Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 107:93-111.
10. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Kastner J (2001): Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1400-1407.
11. Goncalves SI, de Munck JC, Verbunt JPA, Bijma F, Heethaar RM, da Silva FL (2003): In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and realistic models for the head. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50:754-767.
12. He B, Musha T, Okamoto Y, Homma S, Nakajima Y, Sato T (1987): Electric dipole tracing in the brain by means of the boundary element method and its accuracy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 34:406-414.
13. Lin YY, Shih YH, Hsieh JC, Yu HY, Yiu CH, Wong TT, Yeh TC, Kwan SY, Ho LT, Yen DJ, Wu ZA, Chang MS (2003): Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy -comparison with scalp EEC recordings. Neuroimage 19:1115-1126.
14. Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz G, Gonzalez S, Spinelli L, de Peralta RG (2004): EEG source imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2195-2222.
15. Parra J, Kalitzin SN, da Suva FHL (2004): Magnetoencephalography: an investigational tool or a routine clinical technique? Epilepsy Behav 5:277-285.
16. Rosenow F, Luders H (2001): Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Brain 124:1683-1700.
17. Roth BJ, Balish M, Gorbach A, Sato S (1993): How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 87:175-184.
18. Stefan H (1993): Clinical applications of MEG in epilepsy. Brain Topogr 5:425-427.
19. Stefan H, Hummel C, Scheler G, Genow A, Druschky K, Tilz C, Kaltenhauser M, Hopfengartner R, Buchfelder M, Romstock J (2003): Magnetic brain source imaging of focal epileptic activity: a synopsis of 455 cases. Brain 126:2396-2405.
20. Tomita S, Kajihara S, Kondo Y, Yoshida Y, Shibata K, Kado H (1996): Influence of head model in biomagnetic source localization. Brain Topogr 8:337-340.
21. Yvert B, Bertrand O, Thevenet M, Echallier JF, Pernier J (1997): A systematic evaluation of the spherical model accuracy in EEG dipole localization. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 102:452-459.