Particulate representation of a chemical reaction mechanism

Research in Science Education

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 401-415

  Lee, Kam Wah Lucille ^a,b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047152293     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02461601     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ahtee, M., & Varjola, I. (1998). Students' understanding of chemical reaction. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 305-316.
2. Ben-Zvi, R., Silberstein, J., & Mamlok, R. (1990). Macro-micro relationships: A key to the world of chemistry. In P. L. Lijnse, P. De Vos., W. Licht, & A. J. Waarlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles (pp. 183-197). Proceedings of a seminar at Utrecht Centre for Science and Mathematics Education, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
3. Briggs, J. G. R. (1997). Chemistry "O" Level (3rd ed.). Singapore: Longman.
4. Donnelly, J. F., & Welford, A. G. (1988). Children's performance in chemistry. Education in Chemistry, 25, 7-10.
5. Gabel, D. L. (1993). Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 193-194.
6. Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 701-703.
7. Laverty, D. T., & McGarvey, J. E. B. (1991). A " constructivist" approach to learning. Education in Chemistry, 28(4), 99-102.
8. Lee, K. W. L., Goh, N. K., & Chia, L. S. (1993, October). Enhancing conceptual understanding in Science instruction. Paper presented at the Teaching in Science Seminar, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
9. Lythcott, J. J. (1990). Problem solving and requisite knowledge of chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 67, 248-252.
10. Meheut, M., Saltiel, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Students' conceptions about combustion (11-12 years old). European Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 83-93.
11. Noh, T., & Scharmann, L. C. (1997). Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 199-217.
12. Nurrenbern, S. C, & Pickering, M. (1987). Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 508-510.
13. Sawrey, B. A. (1990). Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(3), 253-254.
14. Ten Voorde, H. H. (1990). On teaching and learning about atoms and molecules from a Van Hiele point of view. In P. L. Lijnse, P. De Vos., W. Licht, & A. J. Waarlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles (pp. 81-104). Proceedings of a seminar at Utrecht Centre for Science and Mathematics Education, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
15. Yarroch, W. L. (1985). Student understanding of chemical equation balancing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 449-459.