The distinctions between state, parameter and graph dynamics in sensorimotor control and coordination

Motor Control and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 63-73

  Saltzman, Elliot ^a,b   Nam, Hosung ^c   Goldstein, Louis ^b,c   Byrd, Dani ^d  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047134375     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-28287-4_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Abry, C. & Lallouache, T. (1995). Modeling lip constriction anticipatory behavior for rounding in French with MEM (Movement Expansion Model). In K. Elenius & P. Branderud, (Eds.). Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University, pp. 152-155.
2. Bailly, G., Laboissiere, R., & Schwartz, J. L. (1991). Formant trajectories as audible gestures: An alternative for speech synthesis. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 9-23.
3. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1990). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman (Eds.), in laboratory phonology: I. Between the grammar and the physics of speech. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 341-338.
4. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1995). Gestural syllable position effects in American English. In F. Bell-Berti & L. Raphael, (Eds.). Producing speech: Contemporary issues. Woodbury, New York: American Institute of Physics. Pp. 19-33.
5. Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Bulletin de la Communication Parlee, 5: 25-34, 2000.
6. Bullock, D., & Grossberg, S. (1988). Neural dynamics of planned armmovements: Emergent invariants and speedaccuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychological Review, 95, 49-90.
7. Byrd, D. (1996) Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 24(2), 209-244, 1996.
8. Byrd, D. & Saltzman, E. (1998) Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 173-199.
9. Coker, C. H. (1976). A model of articulatory dynamics and control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 64, 452-460.
10. Farmer, J. D. (1990). A Rosetta Stone for connectionism. Physica D, 42, 153-187.
11. Huang, G.-B., Saratchandran, P., & Sundararajan, N. (2005). A generalized growing and pruning RBF (GGAP-RBF) neural network for function approximation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16 (1), 57-67.
12. Jordan M.I. (1990) Motor learning and the degrees of freedom problem. In Jeannerod M, (ed) Attention and Performance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Jordan M.I. (1992) Constrained supervised learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 396- 425.
14. Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science, 16, 307-354.
15. Kelso, J. A. S., Saltzman, E. L., & Tuller, B. (1986a). The dynamical perspective on speech production: Data and theory. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 29-60.
16. Kelso, J. A. S., Saltzman, E. L., & Tuller, B. (1986b). Intentional contents, communicative context, and task dynamics: Areply to the commentators. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 171-196.
17. Kroger, B., Schroder, G. and Opgen-Rhein, C. (1995) A gesture-based dynamic model describing articulatory movement data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98.4 1878-1889.
18. Laboissiere, R., Schwartz, J.-L. & Bailly, G. Motor control for speech skills: A connectionist approach. Proceedings of the 1990 Summer School. (D. S. Touretzky, J. L. Elman, T. J. Sejnowski & G. E. Hinton, editors), pp. 319-327. San Mateo, CA:Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
19. Lathroum, A. (1989). Feature encoding by neural nets. Phonology, 6, 305-316.
20. Nam, H., & Saltzman, E. (2003). A competitive, coupled oscillator model of syllable structure. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS- 15), Barcelona, Spain.
21. Ostry, D. J., Gribble, P. and Gracco, V. L. (1996) Coarticulation of jaw movements in speech production: Is context sensitivity in speech kinematics centrally planned The Journal of Neuroscience, 16(4), 1570-1579.
22. Quartz, S. R., &Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). The neural base of cognitive development: A constructivist manifesto. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 537-596.
23. Saltzman, E. (1986). Task dynamic coordination of the speech articulators: A preliminary model. Experimental Brain Research, 15, 129-144.
24. Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2000). Task dynamics of gestural timing: Phase windows and multifrequency rhythms. Human Movement Science, 19, 499-526.
25. Saltzman, E., Lofqvist, A., & Mitra, S. (2000). Glue and clocks: Intergestural cohesion and global timing. in Laboratory Phonology. (M. B. Broe & J. B. Pierrehumbert, editors), pp. 88-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Saltzman, E., &Mitra, S. (1998). A task-dynamic approach to gestural patterning in speech: A hybrid recurrent network. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, (Pt.2), 2893 (Abstract).
27. Saltzman, E. L., & Munhall, K. G. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1, 333-382.
28. Saltzman, E., & Munhall, K. G. (1992). Skill acquisition and development: The roles of state-, parameter-, and graph-dynamics. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24(1), 49- 57.
29. Tuller, B. & Kelso, J. A. S. (1991). The production and perception of syllable structure. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 501-508.