Chitosan dressing provides hemostasis in swine femoral arterial injury model

Prehospital Emergency Care

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 172-178

  Gustafson, Scott B ^a   Fulkerson, Pam ^a   Bildfell, Robert ^a   Aguilera, Lisa ^a   Hazzard, Timothy M ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arteries; Bandages; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis, chitosan; Swine

Indexed keywords

CHITOSAN;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTERY INJURY; ARTERY LIGATION; ARTICLE; BANDAGE; BLEEDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMORAL ARTERY; FISHER EXACT TEST; GAUZE DRESSING; HEMOSTASIS; NONHUMAN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WOUND DRESSING;

ANIMALS; BANDAGES; CHITOSAN; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMOSTASIS; MODELS, ANIMAL; OREGON; SUS SCROFA; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 34047119236     PISSN: 10903127     EISSN: 15450066     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10903120701205893     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Neuffer MC, McDivitt J, Rose D, King K, Cloonan CC, Vayer JS. Hemostatic dressings for the first responder: a review. Mil Med. 2004;169(9):716-20.
2. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, Moser KS, Brennan R, Read RA, Pons PT. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma. 1995;38(2):185-93.
3. Bellamy RF. The causes of death in conventional land warfare: implications for combat casualty care research. Mil Med. 1984;149(2):55-62.
4. Pearl JP, McNally MP, Perdue PW. Femoral vessel injuries in modern warfare since Vietnam. Mil Med. 2003;168(9):733-5.
5. Mabry RL, Holcomb JB, Baker AM, Cloonan CC, Uhorchak JM, Perkins DE, Canfield AJ, et al. United States Army Rangers in Somalia: an analysis of combat casualties on an urban battlefield. J Trauma. 2000;49(3):515-28.
6. Holcomb J, MacPhee M, Hetz S, Harris R, Pusateri A, Hess J. Efficacy of a dry fibrin sealant dressing for hemorrhage control after ballistic injury. Arch Surg. 1998;133(1):32-5.
7. Sondeen JL, Pusateri AE, Coppes VG, Gaddy CE, Holcomb JB. Comparison of 10 different hemostatic dressings in an aortic injury. J Trauma. 2003;54(2):280-5.
8. Pusateri AE, Modrow HE, Harris RA, Holcomb JB, Hess JR, Mosebar RH, Reid TJ, et al. Advanced hemostatic dressing development program: animal model selection criteria and results of a study of nine hemostatic dressings in a model of severe large venous hemorrhage and hepatic injury in Swine. J Trauma. 2003;55(3):518-26.
9. Alam B, Uy GB, Miller D, Koustova E, Hancock T, Inocencio R, Anderson D, et al. Comparative analysis of hemostatic agents in a swine model of lethal groin injury. J Trauma. 2003;54(6):1077-82
10. Pusateri AE, Holcomb J, Kheirabadi BS, Hason BA, Wade CE, Ryan KL. Making sense of the preclinical literature on advanced hemostatic products. J Trauma. 2006;60(3):674-82.
11. Acheson EM, Kheirabadi BS, Deguzman R, Dick EJ, Jr. Holcomb JB. Comparison of hemorrhage control agents applied to lethal extremity arterial hemorrhages in swine. J Trauma. 2005;59(4):865-75.
12. Alam HB, Burris DDJA, Rhee P. Hemorrhage control in the battlefield: role of new hemostatic agents. Mil Med. 2005;170(1):63-69.
13. Pusateri AE, McCarthy SJ, Gregory KW, Harris RA, Cardenas L, McManus AT, Goodwin Jr CW. Effect of a chitosan-based hemostatic dressing on blood loss and survival in a model of severe venous hemorrhage and hepatic injury in swine. J Trauma. 2003;54(1):177-82.
14. Kheirabadi S, Acheson EM, Deguzman R, Sondeen JL, Ryan KL, Delgado A, Dick Jr. EJ, et al. Hemostatic efficacy of two advanced dressings in an aortic hemorrhage model in Swine. J Trauma. 2005;59(1):25-345.
15. Alam B, Chen Z, Jaskille A, Querol I, Koustova E, Inocencio R, Conran R, et al. Application of a zeolite hemostatic agent achieves 100% survival in a lethal model of complex groin injury in Swine. J Trauma. 2004;56(5): 974-83.
16. Wedmore I, McManus JG, Pusateri AE, Holcomb JB. A special report on the chitosan-based hemostatic dressing: experience in current combat operations. J Trauma. 2006;60(3):655-8.