Academic patents and materials transfer agreements: Substitutes or complements?

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 157-172

  Mowery, David C ^a   Ziedonis, Arvids A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Materials transfer agreements; University technology transfer

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; CONTRACTUAL STRUCTURE; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES; TRANSFER AGREEMENT; UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN; UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

INDUSTRY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EDUCATION;

EID: 34047092962     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-006-9011-1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Anderson, M. S., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1997) Withholding research results in academic life science. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1224-1228.
2. Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., & Blumenthal, D. (2002) Data withholding in academic genetics; Evidence from a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 473-480.
3. Eisenberg, R. S. (2001). Bargaining over the transfer of propietary research tools: Is this market failing or emerging?. In R. C. Dreyfuss, D. L. Zimmerman, & H. First (Eds.), Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property: Innovation policy for the knowledge society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Fabrizio, K. (2005). Opening the dam or building channels: University patenting and the use of public science in industrial innovation, Working Paper, Goizueta School of Business, Emory University.
5. Lei, Z., Juneja, R., & Wright, B. (2005). Implications of intellectual property protection for academic agricultural biologists. U.C. Berkeley: Agricultural and Resource Economics Department (unpublished MS).
6. Marshall, E. (1997). Need a reagent? Just Sign Here, Science, 278, 212.
7. McCain, K. W. (1991). Communication, Competition, and Secrecy: The production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16, 491-516.
8. Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2004). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? Evidence from patent-paper Pairs, Working Paper.
9. National Institutes of Health (1998). Report of the working group on research tools, http://www.nih.gov/news/researchtools.
10. Rubinstein E. (1990). The untold story of HUT78, Science, 248, 1499-1507.
11. Sampat, B. N. (2004). Genomic patenting by academic researchers: Bad for science? Working Paper.
12. Stern S. (2004). Biological Resource Centers: Knowledge Hubs for the Life Sciences. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
13. Wade N. (1980) Hybridomas: A potent new biotechnology, Science, 208, 692-693.
14. Walsh J. P., Arora A. & Cohen, W. M. (2003). Effects of research tool patents and licensing on biomedical innovation, In W. M. Cohen & S. A. Merrill (Eds.), Patents in the knowledge based economy Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
15. Walsh, J. P., Cho, C., & Cohen, W. M. (2005). The view from the bench: Patents, material transfers and biomedical research. Science, September 23, 2002-2003.