Efficiency of the products for pressure ulcers treatment: A systematic review with meta-analysis;Eficacia de los productos para el tratamiento de las úlceras por presión: Una revisión sistemática con metaanálisis

Gerokomos

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 36-48

  García Fernández, Francisco Pedro ^a,e   Pancorbo Hidalgo, Pedro Luis ^b,e   Verdú Soriano, José ^c,e   Soldevilla Agreda, J Javier ^d,e   Rodríguez Palma, Manuel ^e   Gago Fornells, Manuel ^e,f   Martínez Cuervo, Fernando ^e   Rueda López, Justo ^e,g  

^a Investigación y Calidad   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^d Servicio Riojano de Salud   (Italy)

^e GNEAUPP   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CÁDIZ   (Spain)

^g Unidad Interdisciplinar de Heridad Crónicas   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cost Efficiency; Dressings; Metal analysis; Moist environment treatment; Pressure ulcer; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ALGINIC ACID; COMFEEL; DUODERM; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; POLYURETHAN FOAM;

ABSORPTION; CINAHL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECUBITUS; EMBASE; HUMAN; HYDROCOLLOID; HYDROGEL; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WOUND DRESSING;

EID: 33947723974     PISSN: 1134928X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelisation of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 1962; 193: 293-4.
2. Hinman CD, Mainbach H. Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds. Nature 1963; 200: 377-8.
3. Winter GD, Scales JT. Effect of air drying and dressings on the surface of a wound. Nature 1963; 197: 91-2.
4. Bradley M, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Petticrew M, Sheldon T, Torgerson D. Systematic reviews of wound care management: (2). Dressings and topical agents used in the healing of chronic wounds. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3 (17): 1-35.
5. Royal College of Nursing and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The management of pressure ulcers in primary and secondary care. A Clinical Practice Guideline. Londres: NICE; 2005.
6. Agenda de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias. Efectividad de los Apósitos Especiales en el Tratamiento de las Úlceras por Presión y Vasculares. Instituto De Salud Carlos III-Ministerio De Sanidad y Consumo 2001.
7. Bouza C, Saz Z, Muñoz A, Amate JM. Efficacy of advanced dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care 2005; 14 (5): 193-9.
8. Marzo Castillejo M, Alonso coello P, Rotaeche del Campo R. ¿Cómo clasificar la calidad de la evidencia y la fuerza de las recomendaciones? Aten Primaria 2006; 37 (1): 5-8.
9. Muller E, van Leen MW, Bergernann R. Economic evaluation of collagenase-containing ointment and hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19 (12): 1209-16.
10. Chang KW, Alsagoff S, Ong KT, Sim PH. Pressure ulcers - randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings. Med J Malaysia 1998; 53 (4): 428-31.
11. Matzen S, Peschardt A, Alsbjorn B. A new amorphous hydrocolloid for the treatment of pressure sores: a randomised controlled study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1999; 33 (1): 13-5.
12. Kim YC, Shin JC, Park CI, Oh SH, Choi SM, Kim YS. Efficacy of hydrocolloid occlusive dressing technique in decubitus ulcer treatment: a comparative study. Yonsei Med J 1996; 37 (3): 181-5.
13. Colwell JC, Foreman MD, Trotter JP. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers. Decubitus 1993; 6 (4): 28-36.
14. Xakellis GC, Chrischilles EA. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73 (5): 463-9.
15. Alm A, Hornmark AM, Fall PA et al. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1989; 149: 1-10.
16. Gorse GJ, Messner RL. Improved pressure sore healing with hydrocolloid dressings. Arch Dermatol 1987; 123 (6): 766-71.
17. Capillas Pérez R, Cabré Aguilar V, Gil Colomé AM, Gaitano García A, Torra i Bou JE. Comparación de la efectividad y coste de la cura en ambiente húmedo frente a la cura tradicional. Ensayo clínico en pacientes de atención primaria con úlceras vasculares y por presión. Rev ROL Enferm 2000; 23 (1): 17-24.
18. Aguiló Sánchez S, Figueiras Mareque L, Quintillá Gatnau A, Veiga Bogo L. ¿Apósitos tradicionales o curas en ambiente húmedo? Eficacia y coste de ambos tratamientos en úlceras crónicas. Rev ROL Enferm 2001; 24 (12): 50-4.
19. Kaya AZ, Turani N, Akyuz M. The effectiveness of a hydrogel dressing compared with standard management of pressure ulcers. J Wound Care 2005; 14 (1): 42-4.
20. Thomas DR, Goode PS, LaMaster K, Tennyson T. Acemannan hydrogel dressing versus saline dressing for pressure ulcers. A randomized, controlled trial. Adv Wound Care 1998; 11 (6): 273-6.
21. Colin D, Chomard D, Bois C, Saumet JL, Desvaux B, Marie M. An evaluation of hyper-oxygenated fatty acid esters in pressure sore management. J Wound Care 1998; 7 (2): 71-2.
22. Oleske DM, Smith XP, White P, Pottage J, Donovan MI. A randomized clinical trial of two dressing methods for the treatment of low-grade pressure ulcers. J Enterostomal Ther 1986; 13 (3): 90-8.
23. Kraft M, Lawson L, Pohlman B. A comparison of Epi-lock and saline dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Decubitus 1993; 6: 42-8.
24. Sayag J, Meaume S, Bohbot S. Healing properties of calcium alginate dressings. J Wound Care 1996; 5 (8): 357-62.
25. Nisi G, Brandi C, Grimaldi L, Calabro M, D'Aniello C. Use of a protease-modulating matrix in the treatment of pressure sores. Chir Ital 2005; 57 (4): 465-8.
26. Sebern M. Pressure ulcer management in home health care: efficacy and cost-effectiveness of moisture vapour permeable dressings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 726-9.
27. Belmin J, Meaume S, Rabus MT, Bohbot S, Investigators of the Sequential, Treatment of the Elderly with Pressure Sores (STEPS) Trial. Sequential treatment with calcium alginate dressings and hydrocolloid dressings accelerates pressure ulcer healing in older subjects: a multicenter randomized trial of sequential versus non-sequential treatment with hydrocolloid dressings alone. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50 (2): 269-74.
28. Day A, Dombranski S, Farkas C et al. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1995; 41 (2): 54-8.
29. Seaman S, Herbster S, Muglia J, Murray M, Rick C. Simplifying modern wound management for nonprofessional caregivers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000; 46 (8): 18-27.
30. Brod M, McHerry E, Plasse TF. A randomized comparison of polyhema and hydrocolloid dressings for the treatment of pressure sores. Arch Dermatol. 1990; 126: 969-70.
31. Motta G, Dunham L, Dye T, Mentz J, O'Connell-Gifford E, Smith E. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999; 45 (10): 41-9.
32. Darkovich SL, Brown-Etris M, Spencer M. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1990; 29: 47-60.
33. Martin SJ, Corrado OJ, Kay EA. Enzymatic debridement for necrotic wounds. J Wound Care 1996; 5 (7): 310-1.
34. Amione P, Ricci E, Topo F et al. Comparison of Allevyn Adhesive and Biatain Adhesive in the management of pressure ulcers. J Wound Care 2005; 14 (8): 365-70.
35. Seeley J, Jensen JL, Hutcherson J. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999; 45 (6): 39-44,46-7.
36. Bale S, Squires D, Varnon T, Walker A, Benbow M, Harding KG. A comparison of two dressings in pressure sore management. J Wound Care 1997; 6 (10): 463-6.
37. Thomas S, Banks V, Bale S et al. A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds. J Wound Care 1997; 6 (8): 383-6.
38. Honde C, Derks C, Tudor D. Local treatment of pressure sores in the elderly: amino acid copolymer membrane versus hydrocolloid dressing. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994; 42 (11): 1180-3.
39. Ljungberg S. Comparison of dextranomer paste and saline dressings for management of decubital ulcers. Clin Ther 1998; 20 (4): 737-43.
40. Nasar M, Morley R. Cost-effectiveness in treating deep pressure sores and ulcers. Practitioner 1982; 226: 307-10.
41. Meaume S, Van De Looverbosch D, Heyman H, Romanelli M, Ciangherotti A, Charpin S. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003; 49 (9): 44-51.
42. Graumlich JF, Blough LS, McLaughlin RG et al. Healing pressure ulcers with collagen or hydrocolloid: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51 (2): 147-54.
43. Ohura T, Sanada H, MIno Y. Clinical activity-based cost effectiveness of traditional versus modern wound management in patients with pressure ulcers. Wounds 2004; 16 (5): 157-63.
44. Banks V, Hagelstein S, Thomas N. Comparing hydrocolloid dressings in the management of exudating wounds. Br J Nurs 1999; 8: 640-6.
45. Jones AMSML. Are modern wound dressings a clinical and cost-effective alternative to the use of gauze? J Wound Care 2006; 15 (2): 65-70.
46. Vermeulen HUDTGAdVRLDA. Systematic review for dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 665-72.
47. van Rijswijk L. Ingredient-based wound dressing classification: a paradigm that is passé and in need of replacement. J Wound Care 2006; 15 (1): 11-5.
48. Meaume S, Gemmen E. Cost-effectiveness of wound management in France: pressure ulcers and venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2002; 11 (6): 219-24.
49. Gates JL, Holloway GA. A comparison of wound environments. Ostomy Wound Manage 1992; 38 (8): 34-7.
50. Urrutia G, Tort S, Bonfill X. Metaanálisis (QUOROM). Med Clin 2005; 125 (supl 1): 32-7.
51. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Ryan G et al. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies. JAMA 1993; 269 (21): 2749-53.
52. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337 (8746): 867-72.
53. Smith GD, Egger M. Meta-analysis. Unresolved issues and future developments. BMJ 1998; 7126: 221-5.