Postoperative sensitivity: A comparison of two bonding agents

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 112-117

  Browning, William D ^a,b   Blalock, John S ^a   Callan, Rick S ^a   Brackett, William W ^a   Schull, G Franklin ^a   Davenport, Michael B ^a   Brackett, Martha G ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADPER PROMPT SELF ETCH; ADPER PROMPT SELF-ETCH; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FILTEK Z250; ORGANOPHOSPHATE; RESIN; SINGLE BOND; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STIMULATION;

ADULT; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COLD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHOSPHORIC ACID ESTERS; PHYSICAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33947722100     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/06-58     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Brännström M (1984) Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment Operative Dentistry 9(2) 57-68.
2. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1992) Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems Journal of Dental Research 71(8) 1530-1540.
3. Pashley DH & Carvalho RM (1997) Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion Journal of Dentistry 25(5) 355-372.
4. Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ & Smale I (1998) Class 1 occlusal composite resin restorations: In vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage American Journal of Dentistry 11(5) 229-234.
5. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ & Verdonschot EH (1998) Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class II resin composite restorations in vivo Journal of Dentistry 26(7) 555-562.
6. Gordan VV & Mjör IA (2002) Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer Operative Dentistry 27(6) 543-548.
7. Browning WD (1999) Incidence and severity of postoperative pain following routine placement of amalgam restorations Quintessence International 30(7) 484-489.
8. Browning WD, Johnson WW & Gregory PN (1997) Reduction of postoperative pain: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial Journal of the American Dental Association 128(12) 1661-1667.
9. Browning WD, Johnson WW & Gregory PN (1997) Postoperative pain following bonded amalgam restorations Operative Dentistry 22(2) 66-71.
10. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y & Akamine A (2001) Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: Clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program Journal of Dentistry 29(1) 7-13.
11. Borgmeijer PJ, Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Akerboom HB & Gruythuysen RJ (1991) The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with Class II composite resin restorations Journal of Dentistry for Children 58(5) 378-383.