Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: How should they be performed, evaluated and used?;¿Cómo realizar, evaluar y utilizar revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis?

Gastroenterologia y Hepatologia

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 129-149

  Gisbert, J P ^a,b,d   Bonfill, X ^c  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE LA PRINCESA   (Spain)

^b Cochrane Up Gastr/Pancr Dis Grp ^*  (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^d Playa de Mojacar   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLINICAL TRIALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; EVALUATION STUDIES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; INTERNET; META-ANALYSIS; REVIEW LITERATURE;

EID: 1642423578     PISSN: 02105705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13058397     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Gisbert JP. Fuentes y centros de gestión del conocimiento. Enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal al día 2003;2:32-8.
2. López Arrieta JM, Qizilbash N. La medicina basada en pruebas: revisiones sistemáticas. La Colaboración Cochrane. Med Clin (Barc) 1996;107:581-5.
3. Sáenz A, Ausejo M. Guía para leer e interpretar una revisión sistemática. Rev Soc Mad Med Fam Comunit 2000;2:29-36.
4. Gabriel-Sánchez R, Pladevall-Vila M. Evaluación de la evidencia en medicina: revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicine 1998;7:4845-51.
5. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:376-80.
6. Siwek J, Gourlay ML, Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF. How to write an evidence-based clinical review article. Am Fam Physician 2002;65:251-8.
7. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA 1992;268:240-8.
8. Oxman AD, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH. Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;272:1367-71.
9. Ceballos C, Valdizan JR, Artal A, Almarcegui C, Allepuz C, García Campayo J, et al. ¿Por qué la medicina basada en la evidencia? 20 años de metaanálisis. An Med Interna 2000;17:521-6.
10. Molinero LM. Interpretación, utilidad y limitaciones del metaanálisis. Gastroenterol Hepatol Continuada 2002;1:311-8.
11. Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2 [updated March 2003]. En: Review Manager (RevMan) [computer program]. Versión 4.2. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2003. Disponible en: http://www.cochrane.de/cochrane/hbook.htm
12. Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano. Manual de revisores (versión española de «Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook») [actualización de junio 2000]. Barcelona: Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, 2001. Disponible en: http://www.cochrane.es/Castellano/CC_Handbook
13. Counsell C. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:380-7.
14. Kunz R, Oxman AD. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1998;317:1185-90.
15. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309:1286-91.
16. Delgado-Rodríguez M, Sillero-Arenas M. Sesgos en el metaanálisis. Med Clin (Barc) 1999;112(Supl 1):43-50.
17. Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet 1997;350:326-9.
18. Sutton AJ, Duval SJ, Tweedie RL, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ 2000;320:1574-7.
19. McAuley L, Pham B, Tugwell P, Moher D. Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 2000;356:1228-31.
20. Huang JQ, Hunt RH. Uses and abuses of meta-analysis in gastroenterology. Chin J Dig Dis 2002;3:39-42.
21. Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1983;309:1358-61.
22. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998;352:609-13.
23. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323:42-6.
24. Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles. BMJ 1994;309:648-51.
25. Moher D, Jadad AR, Nichol G, Penman M, Tugwell P, Walsh S. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Control Clin Trials 1995;16:62-73.
26. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1-12.
27. Gisbert JP, Calvet X, Gabriel R, Pajares JM. Infección por Helicobacter pylori y dispepsia funcional. Metaanálisis de la eficacia del tratamiento erradicador. Med Clin (Barc) 2002;118:405-9.
28. 2-antagonists: a metaanalysis of their efficacy in treating bleeding peptic ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:917-26.
29. Gisbert JP, Khorrami S, Carballo F, Calvet X, Gené E, Domínguez-Muñoz E. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy versus antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer (Cochrane Review). En: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2003. Chichester: John Willey & Sons, Ltd.
30. McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Using numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:712-20.
31. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896-900.
32. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM. Rev Esp Salud Pública 2000;74:107-18.
33. Cappelleri JC, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH, De Ferranti SD, Aubert M, Chalmers TC, et al. Large trials versus meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare? JAMA 1996;276:1332-8.
34. LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1997;337:536-42.
35. Moayyedi P, Soo S, Deeks J, Delaney B, Harris A, Innes M, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia (Cochrane Review). En: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003. Oxford: Update Software.
36. Bonfill X, Etcheverry C, Martí J, Glutting JP, Urrutia G, Pladevall M. El desarrollo de la Colaboración Cochrane española. Med Clin (Barc) 1999;112(Supl 1):17-20.