Kemeny's rule and Slater's rule: A binary comparison

Economics Bulletin

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Klamler, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947711810     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15452921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baigent, N. and C. Klamler (2004): Transitive Closure, Proximity and Intransitivities, Economic Theory, 23, 175 - 181.
2. Debord, B. (1987): Caractérisation des matrices de préférences nettes et méthodes d'agrégation associées, Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 97, 5-17.
3. Fishburn, P. (1977): Condorcet Social Choice Functions, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 33, 469-489.
4. Gibbard, A. (1973): Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result, Econometrica, 41, 587 - 601.
5. Kemeny, J. (1959): Mathematics Without Numbers, Daedalus, 88, 577-591.
6. Klamler, C. (2002): The Dodgson Ranking and Its Relation to Kemeny's Method and Slater's Rule, forthcoming Social Choice and Welfare.
7. Klamler, Christian, (2003) A Comparison of the Dodgson Method and the Copeland Rule, Economics Bulletin, Vol. 4 no. 8 pp. 1-7.
8. Laffond, G. et al. (1995): Condorcet Choice Correspondences: A Set-theoretical Comparison, Mathematical Social Sciences, 30, 23-35.
9. Ratliff, T. C. (2001): A Comparison of Dodgson's Method and Kemeny's Rule, Social Choice and Welfare, 18, 79-90.
10. Ratliff, T. C. (2002): A Comparison of Dodgson's Method and the Borda Count, Economic Theory, 20, 357-372.
11. Saari, D. G. (1995): "Basic Geometry of Voting", Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
12. Saari, D. G. and V. R. Merlin (2000): A Geometric Examination of Kemeny's Rule, Social Choice and Welfare, 17, 403-438.
13. Slater, P. (1961): Inconsistencies in a Schedule of Paired Comparisons, Biometrica, 48, 303-312.
14. Young, P. and A. Levenglick (1978): A Consistent Extension of Condorcet's Election Principle, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 35, 285 - 300.