Pre-clinical screening for wear of posterior compositc resiris

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 263-268

  Suzuki, Shiro ^a   Osborne, John W ^b   Leinfelder, Karl F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0030310199     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1996.tb00877.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Smith DC. Posterior composite dental restorative materials: materials development. In: Vanherle G, Smith DG, eds. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Utrecht, The Netherlands : Szulc Inc, 1985: 47–50.
2. Söderboim KJM. Filler systems and resin interface. In: Vanberle G. Smith DC, eds. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Utrecht. The Netherlands : Szule Inc, 1985: 139–159.
3. Monasky GE, Taylor DF. Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1971: 25:299–306.
4. Lugassy AA, Greener EH. An abrasion resistance study of some dental resins. J Dent Res 1972; 51: 967–972.
5. Powers JM, Allen I.J, Craig RG. Two-body abrasion of commercial and experimental restorative and coating resins and amalgam. J Am Dent Assoc 1974: 89:1118–1122.
6. Powers JM, Phillips RW, Norman RD. In vitro wear response of composite resins, amalgam, and enamel. J Dent Res 1975; 54: 1183–1195.
7. Harrison A. The development of an abrasion testing machine for dental materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1975; 9: 341–353.
8. Tootare HM, Powers JM, Craig RG. Wear of composites by abrasive of varying hardness, J Dent Res 1979; 58: 1097–11000.
9. Suzuki S, Nakabayashi N, Masuhara E. The evaluation of new dental resins prepared with polyfunclional methacrylate monomers. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 271–287.
10. Pilliar RM, Smith DC, Maric B. Oscillatory wear tests of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1166–1172.
11. Rice SI., Bailey WF, Roto M, Wayne SF. Wear behaviour of a composite restorative and various styli in sliding contact. J Dent Res 1984; 63:932–935.
12. Rice SI., Bailey WF, Wayne SF, Burns JA. Comparative in vitro sliding wear study of conventional microfilled and light-cared composite restoratives. J Dent Res 1984: 63:1173–1175.
13. Sakaguchi RI., Douglas WH, Delong R, Pintado MR. The wear of posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1986: 2:235–240.
14. McCabe JF, Ogden AR. The relationship between porosity, compressive fatigue limit, and wear in composite resin restorative materials. Dent Mater 1987; 3: 9–12.
15. Finger W, Thiemann J. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo wear of posterior restorative materials. Dent Mater 1987; 3: 280–286.
16. Leinfelder KF, Beaudreau RW, Mazer RB, An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. Quintessence Int 1989; 20: 755–769.
17. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KP. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 199–203.
18. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Shinkai K. Wear resistance of resin cements. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 83–87.
19. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 173–178.
20. Jorgensen KD, Asmussen E. Occlusal abrasion of a composite restorative resin with ultra-fine filler, an initial study. Quintessence lnt 1978; 6: 73–78.
21. Jorgensen KD, Horsted P Janum O, Krogh J, Schulz J. Abrasion of Class 1 restorative resins. Scand J Dent Res 1979: 87:140–145.
22. Mitchem JC, Gronas DG. In vivo evaluation of the wear of restorative resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1982: 104:333–335.
23. Lutz F, Phillips RW, Roulet JF, Setcos JC. In vivo and in vitro wear of posterior composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 914–920.
24. Goldberg AJ, Rydinge E, Santucci EA, Racz WB. Clinical evaluation methods for posterior composite restorations. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1387–1391.
25. Mitchem JC, Gronas DG. The continued in vivo evaluation of the wear of restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 111: 961–964.
26. Vrijhoef MMA, Letzel H, Hendriks FH. A method to determine the loss of dental restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1985; 12: 9–16.
27. Leinfelder KF, Barkmeier WW, Goldberg AJ. Quantitative wear measurement of posterior composite resins. Dent Mater 1986: 2:152–157.
28. Mazer RB. Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin continuing a new type of filler particle. J Esthet Dent 1988; Premier Issue:66–70.
29. Taylor DF, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for analyzing wear of posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 157–160.
30. Lemfelder KF, Broome JC. In vivo ad in vivo evaluation of a new universal composite resin. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 177–183.
31. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KE Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1993: 24: 885–890.
32. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CE Evaluating the antaonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 74–80.
33. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CF, In vitro occlusal wear of Composites and amalgam alloy. J Dent Res 1996: 75:256, (Abstr 1911).
34. Young H, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Antagonistic enamel wear against composite inhy. J Dent Res 1996: 75:256. (Abstr 1912).