A comparison of full non-linear and reduced order aerodynamic models in control law design using a two-dimensional aerofoil model

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 64, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1628-1648

  Allen, C B ^a   Taylor, N V ^a   Fenwick, C L ^a   Gaitonde, A L ^a   Jones, D P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Active flutter suppression; Aeroservoelastic modelling; Reduced order modelling; Transonic flows; Unsteady aerodynamics; Unsteady CFD

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT MODELS; AIRFOILS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; GAIN CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION; TRANSONIC FLOW; UNSTEADY FLOW; VECTORS;

ACTIVE FLUTTER SUPPRESSION; AEROSERVOELASTIC MODELLING; REDUCED ORDER MODELLING; UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS;

FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS);

AERODYNAMICS; AEROFOIL; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUTTER; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; TRANSONIC FLOW;

EID: 28344449092     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1421     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bendiksen OO, Kousen KA. Transonic flutter analysis using the Euler equations. AIAA Paper No. 87-0911-CP, 1987.
2. Kousen KA, Bendiksen OO. Non-linear aspects of the transonic aeroelastic stability problem. AIAA Paper No. 88-2306. Also in AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conference, 1988.
3. Kousen KA, Bendiksen OO. Limit cycle phenomena in computational transonic aeroelasticity. Journal of Aircraft 1994; 31(6):1257-1263.
4. Alonso JJ, Jameson A. Fully-implicit time-marching aeroelastic solutions. AIAA Paper No. 94-0056, January 1994.
5. Guruswamy GP. Unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations for wings using Euler equations. AIAA Journal 1990; 28(3):461-469.
6. Robinson BA, Batina JT, Yang HTY. Aeroelastic analysis of wings using the Euler equations with a deforming mesh. Journal of Aircraft 1991; 28(11):781-788.
7. Badcock KJ, Sim G, Richards BE. Aeroelastic studies using transonic flow CFD modelling. International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics 1995; 18.1-18.12.
8. Prananta BB, Hounjet MHL, Zwaan RJ. Thin layer Navier-Stokes solver and its application for aeroelastic analysis of an airfoil in transonic flow. International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics 1995; 1.1-1.9.
9. Prananta BB, Hounjet MHL. Aeroelastic simulation with advanced CFD methods in 2-d and 3-d transonic flow. Symposium Unsteady Aerodynamics, RAeS, London, U.K., 17-18 July 1996.
10. Meijer JJ, Hounjet MHL, Eussen BJG, Prananta BB. Nlr-tu delf experience in unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelastic simulation applications. Technical Report No. 822, AGARD, Numerical Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Simulation, March 1998; 11-1-11-21.
11. Schuster DM, Beran PS, Huttsell LJ. Application of the ens3dae Euler/ Navier-Stokes aeroelastic method. Technical Report No. 822, AGARD, Numerical Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Simulation, March 1998; 3-1-3-11.
12. Nissim E. Recent advances in aerodynamic energy concept for flutter suppression and gust alleviation using active controls. Technical Report TN D-8519, NASA, 1977.
13. Caspi A, Nissim E, Lottatti I. Application of the aerodynamic energy concept to flutter suppression and gust alleviation by use of active controls. Technical Report TP 1137, NASA, 1978.
14. Nissim E, Abel I. Development and application of an optimization procedure for flutter suppression using the aerodynamic energy concept. Technical Report TP 1137, NASA, 1978.
15. Nissim E. Design of control laws for flutter suppression based on the aerodynamic energy concept and comparisons with other design methods. Technical Report TP 3056, NASA, 1990.
16. Breakwell JV, Edwards JW, Bryson Jr AE. Active flutter control using generalized unsteady aerodynamic theory. Journal of Guidance and Control 1978; 1(1):32-40.
17. Horikawa H, Dowell EA. An elementary explanation of the flutter mechanism with active feedback controls. Journal of Aircraft 1979; 16(4):225-232.
18. Karpel M. Design for active flutter suppression and gust alleviation using state-space aeroelastic modelling. Journal of Aircraft 1982; 19(3):221-227.
19. Batina JT, Young TY. Application of transonic codes to aeroelastic modelling of airfoils including active controls. Journal of Aircraft 1984; 21(8):623-630.
20. Waszak MR. Modelling the benchmark active control technology wind-tunnel model for application to flutter supression. AIAA Paper 96-3437, 1996.
21. Waszak MR. Robust multivariable flutter suppression for the benchmark active control technology (bact) wind-tunnel model. Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Structural Dynamics and Control, VPISU, Blacksburg, VA, 1997.
22. Mukhopadhyay V. Flutter supression control law design and testing for the active flexible wing. Journal of Aircraft 1995; 32(1):45-51.
23. Mukhopadhyay V. Transonic flutter suppression control law design using classical and optimal techniques with wind-tunnel results. AIAA Paper No. 99-1396 at the 40th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, April 1999.
24. Stephens CH, Arena Jr AS, Gupta KK. CFD-based aeroservoelastic predictions with comparisons to benchmark experimental data. AIAA Paper No. 99-0766, 1999.
25. Djayapertapa L. A computational method for coupled aerodynamic-structural calculations in unsteady transonic flow with active control study. Ph.D. Thesis, Aerospace Engineering Department, Bristol University, 2001.
26. Djayapertapa L, Allen CB. Aeroservoelastic simulation by time-marching. Aeronautical Journal 2001; 105(1054):667-678.
27. Djayapertapa L, Allen CB. Numerical simulation of transonic flutter suppression by active control. AIAA Paper 2002-2713, 20th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, St Louis, 2002.
28. Allen CB, Fenwick CL, Taylor NV, Djayapertapa L. Investigation of flutter suppression by active control. AIAA Paper 2003-3510, 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Florida, June 2003.
29. Taylor NV. Unsteady aerodynamic simulation by flight control system integration with structure-coupled CFD. Technical Report AE046, University of Bristol, November 2003.
30. Schmidt W, Jameson A, Turkel E. Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes. AIAA-Paper No. 81-1259, 1981.
31. Kroll N, Jain RK. Solution of two dimensional Euler equations - experience with a finite volume code. Technical Report DFVLR-FB 87-41, DLR, October 1987.
32. Jameson A. Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings. AIAA Paper 91-1596.
33. Gaitonde AL. A dual-time method for the solution of the unsteady Euler equations. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society 1994; 283-291.
34. Allen CB. Grid adaptation for unsteady flow computations. Institution of Mechanical Engineers-Journal of Aerospace Engineering 1997; 211(Part G4):237-250.
35. Gordon WJ, Hall CA. Construction of curvilinear co-ordinates systems and applications to mesh generation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1973; 7:461-477.
36. Eriksson LE. Generation of boundary conforming grids around wing-body configurations using transfinite interpolation. AIAA Journal 1982; 20(10):1313-1320.
37. Allen CB. Central-difference and upwind biased schemes for steady and unsteady Euler aerofoil flows. Aeronautical Journal 1995; 99:52-62.
38. Allen CB. The reduction of numerical entropy generated by unsteady shockwaves. Aeronautical Journal 1997; 101(1001):9-16.
39. Thomas PD, Lombard CK. Geometric conservation laws and its application to flow computations on moving grid. AIAA Journal 1979; 17(10):1030-1037.
40. Djayapertapa L, Allen CB. Time-marching analysis of aeroservoelasticity. Paper 1, RAeS Aerodynamics Conference, London, April 2001.
41. Dowell EH (ed.). A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity (3rd (enlarged) edn). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, 1994.
42. Bathe KJ. Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.
43. Gaitonde AL, Jones DP. The use of pulse responses and system reduction for 2d unsteady flows using the Euler equations. Aeronautical Journal 2002; 106(1063):483-492.
44. Gaitonde AL, Jones DP. Reduced order state-space models from the pulse responses of a linearised CFD scheme. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 42(6):581-606.
45. Schulze S. Transonic aeroelastic simulation of a flexible wing section. Technical Report No. 822, AGARD, Numerical Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Simulation, March 1998; 10-1-11-20.
46. Taylor NV, Allen CB, Gaitonde A, Jones DP. A structure coupled CFD method for time marching flutter analysis. Aeronautical Journal 2004; 108(1084):389-401.
47. Taylor NV, Allen CB, Jones DP, Gaitonde AL, Hill GFJ. Investigation of structural modelling methods for aeroelastic calculations. Number AIAA Paper 2004-5370, 2004.
48. Taylor NV, Jones D, Allen CB, Badcock KJ, Woodgate MA, Rampurawala AM, Cooper JE, Vio GA, Henshaw MJdeC. A comparison of linear and non-linear flutter prediction methods: a summary of puma darp aeroelastic results. Number 28, RAe, September 2004.
49. Taylor NV, Allen CB, Gaitonde A, Jones DP, Fenwick CL, Hill GFJ. Moving mesh CFD-CSD aeroelastic modelling of the bact wing with autonomous flap control. AIAA Paper 2005-4840, to be Presented at the 23rd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2005.
50. Jones DP, Gaitonde A, Roberts I. Identification of limit cycles for piecewise nonlinear aeroelastic systems in transonic regime. Paper AIAA-2005-5132: to be Presented at the 23rd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2005.
51. Librescu L, Chiocchia G, Marzocca P. Implications of physical/ aerodynamical nonlinearities on the character of flutter instability boundary. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 2003; 38:173-199.
52. Marzocca P, Librescu L, Silva WA. Flutter, post-flutter and control of a supersonic wing section. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 2002; 25(5):962-970.
53. Marzocca P, Silva WA, Librescu L. Non-linear open/closed loop aeroelastic analysis of airfoil via volterra series. AIAA Journal 2004; 42(4):673-686.