Water hammer dissipation in pneumatic slug tests

Water Resources Research

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Ostendorf, David W ^a   DeGroot, Don J ^a   Dunaj, Philip J ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; CALIBRATION; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

PNEUMATIC SLUG TESTS; WATER ELASTICITY; WATER HAMMERS;

WATER ANALYSIS;

AQUIFERS; CALIBRATION; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; PRESSURE EFFECTS; WATER ANALYSIS;

AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION; CALIBRATION; DISSIPATION; HYDRAULIC HAMMER; HYDROELASTICITY; PERMEABILITY; WATER COLUMN; WELL WATER;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; MASSACHUSETTS; MURRAY BASIN; NORTH AMERICA; PLYMOUTH-CARVER AQUIFER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33947652313     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2005WR004817     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Beveridge, G. S. G., and R. S. Schechter (1970), Optimization: Theory and Practice, McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. Bouwer, H., and R. C. Rice (1976), A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells, Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 423-428.
3. Carslaw, H. S., and J. C. Jaeger (1973), Conduction of Heat in Solids, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
4. Dunaj, P. J., D. J. DeGroot, and D. W. Ostendorf (2006), High frequency data acquisition system for field measurement of hydraulic conductivity in a sand aquifer, paper presented at GeoCongress 2006, Am. Soc. of Civ. Eng., Atlanta, Ga.
5. Hildebrand, F. B. (1976), Advanced Calculus for Applications, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. J.
6. Hvorslev, M. J. (1951), Time lag and soil permeability in ground water observations, Waterw. Exp. Stn. Bull. 36, U. S. Army Corps of Eng., Vicksburg, Miss.
7. Ostendorf, D. W., D. J. DeGroot, P. J. Dunaj, and J. Jakubowski (2005), A closed form slug test theory for high permeability aquifers, Ground Water, 43(1), 87-101.
8. Proesser, D. W. (1981), A method of performing response tests on highly permeable aquifers, Ground Water, 19(6), 588-592.
9. Spiegel, M. R. (1965), LaPlace Transforms, McGraw-Hill, New York.
10. Springer, R. K., and L. W. Gelhar (1991), Characterization of large scale aquifer heterogeneity in glacial outwash by analysis of slug tests with oscillatory responses. Cape Cod, Massachusetts,, U. S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest., 91-4034.
11. Street, R. L., G. Z. Watters, and J. K. Vennard (1995), Elementary Fluid Mechanics, John Wiley, Hoboken, N. J.
12. Streeter, V. L., E. B. Wylie, and K. W. Bedford (1998), Fluid Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. van der Kamp, G. (1976), Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: The underdamped case, Water Resour. Res., 12(1), 71-77.
14. Weaver, W., S. P. Timoshenko, and D. H. Young (1990), Vibration Problems in Engineering, John Wiley, Hoboken, N. J.
15. Zemansky, G. M., and C. D. McElwee (2005), High resolution slug testing, Ground Water, 43(2), 222-230.
16. Zurbuchen, B. R., V. A. Zlotnik, and J. J. Butler (2002), Dynamic interpretation of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 38(3), 1025, doi:10.1029/2001WR000354.