High-resolution slug testing

Ground Water

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 222-230

  Zemansky, G M ^a   McElwee, C D ^b  

^a Horizon Geohydrology Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; CONTAMINATION; FLOW OF WATER; GROUNDWATER; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; RIVERS; WELLS;

DELINEATION; GROUND WATER FLOW; SLUG TESTING; SPATIAL VARIABILITY;

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY;

FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; SLUG TEST;

GASTROPODA;

EID: 15944374826     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.0008.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, M.P. 1997. Characterization of geological heterogeneity. In Subsurface Flow and Transport: A Stochastic Approach, ed. G. Dagan and S.P. Neuman, 23-43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barker, J.A., and J.H. Black. 1983. Slug tests in fissured aquifers. Water Resources Research 19, no. 6: 1558-1564.
3. Bohling, G. 1998. Evaluation of an induced gradient tracer test in an alluvial aquifer. Ph.D. diss., Department of Geology, University of Kansas.
4. Boman, G.K., F.J. Molz, and K.D. Boone. 1997. Borehole flowmeter application in fluvial sediments: Methodology, results, and assessment. Ground Water 35, no. 3: 443-450.
5. Butler, J.J. Jr., A.A. Lanier, J.M. Healey, S.M. Sellwood, W. McCall, and E. Garnett. 2000. Direct-push hydraulic profiling in an unconsolidated alluvial aquifer. Kansas Geological Survey Open-File Report 2000-62.
6. Dougherty, D.E., and D.K. Babu. 1984. Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir. Water Resources Research 20, no. 8: 1116-1122.
7. Hess, K.M., S.H. Wolf, and M.A. Celia. 1992. Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts 3. Hydraulic conductivity variability and calculated macrodispersivities. Water Resources Research 28, no. 8: 2011-2027.
8. Hvorslev, M.J. 1951. Time lag and soil permeability in groundwater observations. Waterways Experimental Station, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army. Bulletin no. 36.
9. Karasaki, J.C., C.S. Long, and P.A. Witherspoon. 1988. Analytical models of slug tests. Water Resources Research 24, no. 1: 115-126.
10. McCall, W., J.J. Butler Jr., J.M. Healey, A.A. Lanier, S.M. Sellwood, and E.J. Garnett. 2002. A dual-tube direct-push method for vertical profiling of hydraulic conductivity in unconsolidated formations. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 8, no. 2: 75-84.
11. McElwee, C.D. 2001. Application of a nonlinear slug test model. Ground Water 19, no. 5: 737-744.
12. McElwee, C.D. 1998. Multilevel nonlinear slug tests to characterize high conductivity aquifers. Kansas Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-62.
13. McElwee, C.D., and J.J. Butler Jr. 1995. Characterization of heterogeneities controlling the transport and fate of pollutants in unconsolidated sand and gravel aquifers. Kansas Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-16.
14. McElwee, C.D., and H.C. Ross. 2001. Toward a 3-D picture of hydraulic conductivity with multilevel slug tests. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 82, no. 47: F382 (also Kansas Geological Survey Open-File Report 2001-51).
15. McElwee, C.D., and G.M. Zemansky. 2000. Slug testing in aquifers with a mobile fine fraction. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 81, no. 48: F430 (also Kansas Geological Survey Open-File Report 2000-83).
16. McElwee, C.D., and G.M. Zemansky. 1999. Improved definition of hydraulic conductivity structure using multilevel nonlinear slug tests. In EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 80, no. 46: F397 (also Kansas Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-57).
17. McElwee, C.D., and M.A. Zenner. 1998. A nonlinear model for analysis of slug-test data. Water Resources Research 34, no. 1: 55-66.
18. Melville, J.G., F.J. Molz, O. Guven, and M.A. Widdowson. 1991. Multilevel slug tests with comparisons to tracer data. Ground Water 29, no. 6: 897-907.
19. Molz, F.J., and G.K. Boman. 1993. A fractal-based stochastic interpolation scheme in subsurface hydrology. Water Resources Research 29, no. 11: 3769-3774.
20. Molz, F.J., O. Guven, and J.G. Melville. 1990a. New approach and methodologies for characterizing the hydrogeologic properties of aquifers. Report no. EPA/600/2-90/002. Ada, Oklahoma: Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
21. Molz, F.J., O. Guven, J.G. Melville, and C. Cardone. 1990b. Hydraulic conductivity measurement at different scales and contaminant transport modeling. In Dynamics of Fluids in Hierarchical Porous Media, ed. J.H. Cushman, 37-59. New York: Academic Press.
22. Molz, F.J., R.H. Morin, A.E. Hess, J.G. Melville, and O. Guven. 1989. The impeller meter for measuring aquifer permeability variations: Evaluation and comparison with other tests. Water Resources Research 25, no. 7: 1677-1683.
23. Nielsen, D.M., ed. 1991. Practical Handbook of Ground-Water Monitoring. Chelsea, Michigan: Lewis Publishers Inc.
24. Sellwood, S.M., J.M. Healey, S. Birk, and J.J. Butler Jr. 2005. Direct-push hydrostratigraphic profiling: Coupling electrical logging and slug tests. Ground water 43, no. 1: 19-29.
25. Widdowson, M.A., F.J. Molz, and J.G. Melville. 1990. An analysis technique for multilevel and partially penetrating slug test data. Ground Water 28, no. 6: 937-945.
26. Wiedemeier, T.H., and P.E. Haas. 2002. Designing monitoring programs to effectively evaluate the performance of natural attenuation. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation 22, no. 3: 124-135.