Chloroplast data reveal two conflicting hypotheses for the positions of Campylostelium and Grimmia pitardii (Bryophyta)

Taxon

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 89-94

  Hernández Maqueda, Rafael ^a   Quandt, Dietmar ^b   Werner, Olaf ^c   Muñoz, Jesús ^a  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bryophyta; Campylostelium; Campylostelium pitardii; Chloroplast sequences; Grimmia; Grimmiaceae; Ptychomitriaceae; Ptychomitrium; Systematics; trnL F; trnS rps4

Indexed keywords

CHEMOTAXONOMY; CHLOROPLAST; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MOSS; NOMENCLATURE; PHYLOGENETICS; RELATEDNESS;

ASIA; CENTRAL ASIA; EURASIA; MEDITERRANEAN REGION; MEDITERRANEAN SEA;

BRYOPHYTA; CAMPYLOSTELIUM; COSCINODON; GRIMMIA; GRIMMIACEAE; PTYCHOMITRIACEAE; PTYCHOMITRIUM; RACOMITRIUM; SCHISTIDIUM; UMBRINA CIRROSA;

EID: 33947638047     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agnew, S. 1973. A new Middle Eastern Grimmia. J. Bryol. 7: 339-342.
2. Buck, W.R. & Goffinet, B. 2000. Morphology and classification of mosses. Pp. 71-123 in: Shaw, A.J. & Goffinet, B. (eds.), Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
4. Greven, H.C. 2003. Grimmias of the World. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
5. Hedderson, T.A., Murray, D.J., Cox, C.J. & Nowell, T.L. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of haplolepideous mosses (Dicranidae) inferred from rps4 gene sequences. Syst. Bot. 29: 29-41.
6. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Larget, B., Miller, R.E. & Ronquist, F. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51: 673-688.
7. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
8. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J.P. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294: 2310-2314.
9. Kelchner, S.A. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 87: 482-498.
10. La Farge, C., Mishler, B.D., Wheeler, J.A., Wall, D.P., Johannes, K., Schaffer, S. & Shaw, A.J. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the haplolepideous mosses. Bryologist 103: 257-276.
11. Lazarenko, L.S. 1970. Novi vidi brioflori Tadzhikistanya [New species of the Tajikistan brioftora]. Dopov. Akad. Nauk Ukraïns' k. R.S.R. 11: 1038-1040.
12. Limpricht, K.G. 1890. Die Laubmoose Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz, vol. 1. Eduard Kummer, Leipzig.
13. Loeske, L. 1930. Monographic der europäischen Grimmiaceen. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart [Biblioth. Bot. 101].
14. Maier, E. 1998. Zur systematischen Stellung von Grimmia pitardii Corb. (Musci). Candollea 53: 301-308.
15. Matthews, D.H., Zuker, M. & Turner, D.H. 2004. RNA-structure 4.1. http://128.151.176.70/RNAstructure.html
16. Müller, J. & Müller, K. 2004. TreeGraph: automated drawing of complex tree figures using an extensible tree description format. Molec. Ecol. 4: 786-788.
17. Müller, K. 2004a. PRAP-computation of Bremer support for large data sets. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 31: 780-782.
18. Müller, K. 2004b. SeqState - primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Appl. Bioinf. 4: 65-69.
19. Müller, K., Quandt, D., Müller, J. & Neinhuis, C. 2005. PhyDE® v0.92: Phylogenetic Data Editor. http://www .phyde.de
20. Muñoz, J. & Pando, F. 2000. A world synopsis of the genus Grimmia (Musci, Grimmiaceae). Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis [Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 83].
21. Nadot, S., Bajon, R. & Lejeune, B. 1994. The chloroplast gene rps4 as a tool for the study of Poaceae phylogeny. Pl. Syst. Evol. 191: 27-38.
22. Nixon, K.C. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
23. Nuin, P.A.S. 2005. MTgui - a simple interface to ModelTest. Program distributed by the author, University of Toronto. http://www.genedrift. org/mtgui.php
24. Ochyra, R., Żarnowiec, J. & Bednarek-Ochyra, H. 2003. Census catalogue of Polish mosses. Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Kraków.
25. Pitard, J., & Corbière, L. 1909. Additions à la flore des Muscinées de la Tunisie. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 56: LV-LVIII.
26. Posada, D. & Crandall K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
27. Quandt, D., Müller, K. & Huttunen, S. 2003. Characterisation of the chloroplast DNA psbT-H region and the influence of dyad symmetrical elements on phylogenetic reconstructions. Pl. Biol. 5: 400-410.
28. Quandt, D. & Stech, M. 2004. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast trnT-trnF region in bryophytes. Pl. Biol. 6: 545-554.
29. Quandt, D. & Stech, M. 2005. Molecular evolution of the trnL-UAA intron in bryophytes. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 36: 429-443.
30. Shaw, A.J. 2000. Phylogeny of the Sphagnopsida based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Bryologist 103: 277-306.
31. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
32. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
33. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105-1109.
34. Tsubota, H., Ageno, Y., Estébanez, B., Yamaguchi, T. & Deguchi, H. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of the Grimmiales (Musci) based on chloroplast rbcL sequences. Hikobia 14: 55-70.