The reinforcing, subject-rated, performance, and cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine: Influence of sensation-seeking status

Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1177-1188

  Stoops, William W ^a   Lile, Joshua A ^a   Robbins, C Glenn ^a   Martin, Catherine A ^a   Rush, Craig R ^a,b   Kelly, Thomas H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

d Amphetamine; Drug reinforcement; Performance effects; Sensation seeking status; Subject rated effects

Indexed keywords

DEXAMPHETAMINE; PLACEBO;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DOSE RESPONSE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG CAPSULE; DRUG DOSE INCREASE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PROFILE OF MOOD STATES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REINFORCEMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33947627101     PISSN: 03064603     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alessi S.M., Greenwald M., and Johanson C.E. The prediction of individual differences in response to d-amphetamine in healthy adults. Behavioural Pharmacology 14 (2003) 19-32
2. Brennan A.F., Walfish S., and AuBuchon P. Alcohol use and abuse in college students: I. A review of individual and personality correlates. International Journal of the Addictions 21 (1986) 449-474
3. Carrol E.N., Zuckerman M., and Vogel W.H. A test of the optimal level of arousal theory of sensation seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1982) 572-575
4. Chait L.D. Factors influencing the reinforcing and subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans. Behavioural Pharmacology 4 (1993) 191-199
5. Cheong J., and Nagoshi C. Effects of sensation seeking, instruction set, and alcohol/placebo administration on aggressive behavior. Alcohol 17 (1999) 81-86
6. Comer S.D., Collins E.D., and Fischman M.W. Choice between money and intranasal heroin in morphine-maintained humans. Behavioural Pharmacology 8 (1997) 677-690
7. Comer S.D., Collins E.D., MacArthur R.B., and Fischman M.W. Comparison of intravenous and intranasal heroin self-administration by morphine-maintained humans. Psychopharmacology 143 (1999) 327-338
8. Comer S.D., Collins E.D., Wilson S.T., Donovan M.R., Foltin R.W., and Fischman M.W. Effects of an alternative reinforcer on intravenous heroin self-administration by humans. European Journal of Pharmacology 345 (1998) 13-26
9. Comer S.D., Haney M., Foltin R.W., and Fischman M.W. Amphetamine self-administration by humans: Modulation by contingencies associated with task performance. Psychopharmacology 127 (1996) 39-46
10. Comer S.D., Walker E.A., and Collins E.D. Buprenorphine/naloxone reduces the reinforcing and subjective effects of heroin in heroin-dependent volunteers. Psychopharmacology 181 (2005) 664-675
11. Corr P.J., and Kumari V. Individual differences in mood reactions to d-amphetamine: a test of three personality factors. Journal of Psychopharmacology 14 (2000) 371-377
12. de Wit H. Individual differences in acute effects of drugs in humans: Their relevance to risk for abuse. NIDA Research Monograph 169 (1998) 176-187
13. de Wit H., Uhlenhuth E.H., and Johanson C.E. Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 16 (1986) 341-360
14. de Wit H., Uhlenhuth E.H., Pierri J., and Johanson C.E. Individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses to alcohol. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 11 (1987) 52-59
15. Fillmore M.T., Kelly T.H., and Martin C.A. Effects of d-amphetamine in human models of information processing and inhibitory control. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 77 (2005) 151-159
16. Fischman M.W. Cocaine and amphetamine effects on repeated acquisition in humans. Federated Proceedings 37 (1978) 618
17. Frisher M., Crome I., Macleod J., Millson D., and Croft P. Substance misuse and psychiatric illness: Prospective observational study using the general practice research database. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59 (2005) 847-850
18. Foltin R.W., and Fischman M.W. Assessment of abuse liability of stimulant drugs in humans: a methodological survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 28 (1991) 3-48
19. Foltin R.W., and Fischman M.W. Methods for the assessment of abuse liability of psychomotor stimulants and anorectic agents in humans. British Journal of Addiction 86 (1991) 1633-1640
20. Griffiths R.R., Bigelow G.E., and Liebson I.A. Reinforcing effects of caffeine in coffee and capsules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 52 (1989) 127-140
21. Haney M., Comer S.D., Ward A.S., Foltin R.W., and Fischman M.W. Factors influencing marijuana self-administration by humans. Behavioural Pharmacology 8 (1997) 101-112
22. Hawkins J.D., Catalano R.F., and Miller J.Y. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1992) 64-105
23. Helmus T.C., Tancer M., and Johanson C.E. Reinforcing effects of diazepam under anxiogenic conditions in individuals with social anxiety. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 13 (2005) 348-356
24. Huba G.J., Newcomb M.D., and Bentler P.M. Comparison of canonical correlation and interbattery factor analysis on sensation seeking and drug use domains. Applied Psychological Measurement 5 (1981) 291-306
25. Hutchison K.E., Wood M.D., and Swift R. Personality factors moderate subjective and psychophysiological responses to d-amphetamine in humans. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 7 (1999) 493-501
26. Johanson C.E., and Uhlenhuth E.H. Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 71 (1980) 275-279
27. Kelly, T. H., Delzer, T. A., Martin, C. A., Harrington, N. G., Hays, L. R., Bardo, M. T. (submitted for publication). Performance and subjective effects of diazepam and d-amphetamine in high and low sensation seekers.
28. Kelly T.H., Hienz R.D., Zarcone T.J., Wurster R.M., and Brady J.V. Crewmember performance before, during, and after spaceflight. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 84 (2005) 227-241
29. Kelly, T. H., Robbins, G., Martin, C. A., Fillmore, M., Lane, S. D., Harrington, N. G., Rush, C. R., (in press). Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-Amphetamine and sensation-seeking status. Psychopharmacology.
30. Kreek M.J., Nielsen D.A., Butelman E.B., and LaForge K.S. Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity, and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 1450-1457
31. Lamb R.J., Preston K.L., Schindler C.W., Meisch R.A., Davis F., Katz J.L., et al. The reinforcing and subjective effects of morphine in post-addicts: A dose-response study. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 259 (1991) 1165-1173
32. Laviola G., Adriani W., Terranova M.L., and Gerra G. Psychobiological risk factors for vulnerability to psychostimulants in human adolescents and animal models. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 223 (1999) 993-1010
33. Lott D.C., Kim S.J., Cook Jr. E.H., and de Wit H. Dopamine transporter gene associated with diminished subjective response to amphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 30 (2005) 602-609
34. Martin W.R., Sloan J.W., Sapira J.D., and Jasinski D.R. Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 12 (1971) 245-258
35. McLeod D.R., and Griffiths R.R. Human progressive-ratio performance: Maintenance by pentobarbital. Psychopharmacology 79 (1983) 4-9
36. McLeod D.R., Griffiths R.R., Bigelow G.E., and Yingling J. An automated version of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Behavioral Research Methods and Instruments 14 (1982) 463-466
37. McNair, D. M., Lorr, M.,Droppleman, L. F. (1971). Profile of Mood States (manual). Educational and Industrial Testing Services, Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
38. Palmgreen P., Donohew L., Lorch E.P., Hoyle R.H., and Stephenson M.T. Television campaigns and adolescent marijuana use: Tests of sensation seeking targeting. American Journal of Public Health 91 (2001) 292-296
39. Perkins K.A., Gerlach D., Broge M., Grobe J.E., and Wilson A. Greater sensitivity to subjective effects of nicotine in nonsmokers high in sensation seeking. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 8 (2000) 462-471
40. Rush C.R., Essman W.D., Simpson C.A., and Baker R.W. Reinforcing and subject-rated effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in non-drug-abusing humans. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 21 (2001) 273-286
41. Saxon A.J., Oreskovich M.R., and Brkanac Z. Genetic determinants of addiction to opioids and cocaine. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 13 (2005) 218-232
42. Stafford D., LeSage M.G., and Glowa J.R. Progressive-ratio schedules of drug delivery in the analysis of drug self-administration: A review. Psychopharmacology 139 (1998) 169-184
43. Stoops W.W., Fillmore M.T., Poonacha M.S., Kingery J.E., and Rush C.R. Alcohol choice and amphetamine effects in light and moderate drinkers. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 27 (2003) 804-811
44. Stoops W.W., Glaser P.E., Fillmore M.T., and Rush C.R. Reinforcing, subject-rated, performance and physiological effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in stimulant abusing humans. Journal of Psychopharmacology 18 (2004) 534-543
45. Stoops W.W., Lile J.A., Fillmore M.T., Glaser P.E., and Rush C.R. Reinforcing effects of methylphenidate: Influence of dose and behavioral demands following drug administration. Psychopharmacology 177 (2005) 349-355
46. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2004 National survey on drug use and health: National findings (2005). http://oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k4NSDUH/2k4results/2k4results.htm#ch3 http://oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k4NSDUH/2k4results/2k4results.htm#ch3 Accessed 25 January 2006
47. White T.L., Lott D.C., and de Wit H. Personality and the subjective effects of acute amphetamine in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (2006) 1064-1074
48. Wills T.A., DuHamel K., and Vaccaro D. Activity and mood temperament as predictors of adolescent substance use: Test of a self-regulation mediation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (1995) 901-916
49. Wills T.A., Vaccaro D., and McNamara G. Novelty seeking, risk taking, and related constructs as predictors of adolescent substance use: An application of Cloninger's theory. Journal of Substance Abuse 6 (1994) 1-20
50. Zuckerman M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking (1994), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
51. Zuckerman M., Eysenck S.B., and Eysenck H.J. Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 46 (1978) 139-149
52. Zuckerman M., Kuhlman D.M., Joireman J., Teta P., and Kraft M. A comparison of three structural models of personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993) 757-768