Light-adjustable lens: Customizing correction for multifocality and higher-order aberrations

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society

Volumn 104, Issue , 2006, Pages 29-38

  Sandstedt, Christian A ^a   Chang, Shiao H ^a   Grubbs, Robert H ^b   Schwartz, Daniel M ^c  

^a Calhoun Vision Inc   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIFOCAL LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYPERMETROPIA; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERFEROMETER; IRRADIATION; LENS IMPLANT; LIGHT; LIGHT INTENSITY; MULTIFOCAL LENS; MYOPIA; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SENSOR;

ANIMALS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HYPEROPIA; INTERFEROMETRY; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; LIGHT; MODELS, ANIMAL; MYOPIA; OPTICS; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RABBITS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; SILICONE ELASTOMERS;

EID: 33947617784     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15456110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brandser JR, Haaskjold E, Dorsum L. Accuracy of IOL calculation in cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:162-165.
2. Olsen T, Thim K, Corydon L. Accuracy of the newer generation intraocular-lens power calculation formulas in long and short eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:187-193.
3. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular-lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:125-129.
4. Pierro L, Modorati G, Brancato R. Clinical variability in keratometry, ultrasound biometry measurements, and emmetropic intraocular-lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:91-94
5. Sedgewick JH, Orillac RO, Link C. Array multifocal intraocular lens in a charity hospital training program. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1205-1210.
6. Schwartz DM. Light-adjustable lens. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2003;101:417-436.
7. Schwartz DM, Sandstedt CA, Chang SH, et al. Light-adjustable lens: development of in-vitro nomograms. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2004;102:67-72; discussion 72-74.
8. Olson R, Mamalis N, Haugen B. A light adjustable lens with injectable optics. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2006;19:135-142.
9. Crivello JV, Dietliker K. Photoinitiators for free radical cationic & anionic photopolymerization. In: Bradley G, ed. Chemistry & Technology of UV & EB Formulation for Coatings, Inks & Paints. Vol III. London: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
10. Mainster MA. The spectra, classification, and rationale of ultraviolet-protective intraocular lenses Am J Ophthalmol 1986;102:727-732.
11. Altmann GE, Nichamin LD, Lane SS, Pepose JS. Optical performance of 3 intraocular lens designs in the presence of decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:574-585.
12. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS. Wavefront technology in cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:56-60.
13. Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost DJ, et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 106:1243-1255.
14. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Influence of astigmatism on multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;13:477-482.
15. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Correlation between pupillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive multifocal lens and a monofocal lens. Ophthalmology 2000;108:2011-2017.
16. Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G, et al. A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg 2002;18:683-691.