Light-adjustable lens: Development of in vitro nomograms

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society

Volumn 102, Issue , 2004, Pages 67-74

  Schwartz, Daniel M ^a   Sandstedt, Christian A ^b   Chang, Shiao H ^b   Kornfield, Julie A ^c   Grubbs, Robert H ^c   Steinert, Roger F ^d   Guyton, David L ^d   Nork, Michael ^d   Spaeth, George L ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Calhoun Vision Inc   (United States)

^c California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EXTRACTION; HYPERMETROPIA; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERFEROMETRY; IRRADIATION; LENS; LIGHT; MYOPIA; NOMOGRAM; OPTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WETTABILITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; METHODOLOGY;

SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ASTIGMATISM; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERFEROMETRY; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; LIGHT; MYOPIA; NOMOGRAMS; OPTICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SILICONES; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 17244366994     PISSN: 15456110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Murphy C, Tuft SJ, Minassian DC. Refractive error and visual outcome after cataract extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:62-66.
2. Minassian DC, Rosen P, Dart JK, et al. Extracapsular cataract extraction compared with small incision surgery by phacoemulsification: a randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:822-829.
3. Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost DJ, et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1243-1255.
4. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular-lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:125-129.
5. Pierro L, Modorati G, Brancato R. Clinical variability in keratometry, ultrasound biometry measurements, and emmetropic intraocular-lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:91-94.
6. Elder MJ. Predicting the refractive outcome after cataract surgery: the comparison of different IOLs and SRK-II v SRK-T. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:620-622.
7. Connors R, Boseman P, Olson RJ. Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:235-238.
8. Lundstrom M, Barry P, Leite E, et al. 1998 European cataract outcome study: report from the European Cataract Outcome Study Group. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1176-1184.
9. Uusitalo RJ, Aine E, Sen NH, et al. Implantable contact lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:29-36.
10. Mamalis N. Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention-2001 survey update. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:2193-2201.
11. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Luke C, et al. Multifocal intraocular lens implantation in prepresbyopic patients with unilateral cataract. Ophthalmology 2002;109:680-686.
12. Hoffer KJ. Biometry of 7,500 cataractous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;90:360-368.
13. Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2000;16:349-361.
14. Langenbucher A, Haigis W, Seitz B. Difficult lens power calculations. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:1-9.
15. Gimbel HV, Sun R, Furlong MT, et al. Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1147-1151.
16. Odenthal MT, Eggink CA, Melles G, et al. Clinical and theoretical results of intraocular lens power calculation for cataract surgery after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:431-438.
17. Kraser GN, inventor; CooperVision, Inc, assignee. Small incision intraocular lens with adjustable refractive power. US patent 4,950,289. August 21, 1990.
18. Eggleston HC, Day T, inventors. Adjustable and removable intraocular lens implant. US patent 5,628,798. May 13, 1997.
19. Eggleston HC, Day T, inventors. Adjustable intraocular lens implant with magnetic adjustment facilities. US patent 5,800,533. September 1, 1998.
20. O'Donnell FE, inventor. In vivo modification of refractive power of an intraocular lens implant. US patent 5,549,668. August 27, 1996.
21. O'Donnell FE, inventor. In vivo modification of refractive power of an intraocular lens implant. US patent 5,725,575. March 10, 1998.
22. Jahn CE, Jahn MA, Kreiner CF, et al. Intraocular lens with reversibly adjustable optical power: pilot study of concept and safety. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1795-1799.
23. Schwartz DM. Light adjustable lens. Trans Am Ophthamol Soc 2003;101:417-436.
24. International Organization for Standardization ISO 11979-2. Ophthalmic implants-intraocular lenses-Part 2: Optical properties and test methods, 1999. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1999.
25. Hughes A. A useful table of reduced schematic eyes for vertebrates which includes computed longitudinal chromatic aberrations. Vision Res 1979;19:1273-1275.
26. Hughes A. A schematic eye for the rabbit. Vision Res 1979;12:123-138.
27. Benedek GB. Theory of transparency of the eye. Applied Optics 1979;10:459-473.
28. Farrell RA, McCally RL, Tatham PER. Wavelength dependencies of light scattering in normal and cold swollen rabbit corneas and their structural implications. J Physiol 1973;233:589-612.
29. Boettner EA, Wolter JR. Transmission of ocular media. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1962;1:776-783.
30. Dillon J, Zheng L, Merriam JC, et al. The optical properties of the anterior segment of the eye: implications for cortical cataract. Exp Eye Res 1999;68:785-795.
31. Kolozvarski L, Nogradi A, Hopp B, et al. UV absorbance of the human cornea in the 240 to 400 nm range. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2165-2168.