The Kyoto protocol and sustainable cities: Potential use of clean-development mechanism in structuring cities for carbon-efficient transportation

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1983, 2006, Pages 158-166

  Donoso, Pedro ^a   Martinez, Francisco ^a   Zegras, Christopher ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GASES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM (CDM); GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; URBAN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS;

MASS TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 33947605786     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1983-21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Gilbert, G., and J. S. Dajani. Energy, Urban Form and Transportation Policy. Transportation Research, Vol. 8, 1974, pp. 267-276.
2. International Energy Annual, 2003. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2005. www.eia.doe.gov/iea/. Accessed Sept. 20, 2006.
3. Browne, J., E. Sanhueza, E. Silsbe, S. Winkelman, and C. Zegras. Getting on Track: Finding a Path for Transportation and the CDM. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2005.
4. LABTUS, Location Efficiency and Transit-Oriented Development: A Potential CDM Option in Santiago de Chile. Final Report. Universidad de Chile, Laboratorio de Modelamiento del Transporte y Uso de Suelo, Santiago, Chile, Oct. 2004.
5. Heywood, J. B., M. A. Weiss, A. Schafer, S. A. Bassene, and V. K. Natarajan. The Performance of Future ICE and Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles and Their Potential Fleet Impact. Publication LFEE 2003-004 RP. Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Dec. 2003.
6. IEA/SMP Transport Model. International Energy Agency. wbcsd.org/plugins/DocSearch/details.asp?type=DocDet&ObjectId=MTE0Njc. Accessed Sept. 20, 2006.
7. World Population Prospects: The 2002 Revision and World Urbanization Prospects. Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Secretariat, 2002.
8. Handy, S. Methodologies for Exploring the Link Between Urban Form and Travel Behavior. Transportation Research D, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1996, pp. 151-165.
9. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87-113.
10. Crane, R. On Form Versus Function: Will the New Urbanism Reduce Traffic, or Increase It? Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 15, 1996, pp. 117-126.
11. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applications to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
12. Rajamani, J., C. R. Bhat, S. Handy, G. Knaap, and Y. Song. Assessing Impact of Urban Form Measures on Nonwork Trip Mode Choice After Controlling for Demographic and Level-of-Service Effects. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2003, pp. 158-165.
13. Jamieson, G. B., W. K. Mackay, and J. C. R. Latchford. Transportation and Land Use Structures. Urban Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, Nov., 1967, pp. 201-217.
14. Edwards, J. L., and J. L. Schofer. Relationships Between Transportation Energy Consumption and Urban Structure: Results of Simulation Studies. In Transportation Research Record 599, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 52-59.
15. Weisel, W. M., and J. L. Schofer. The Effects of Nucleated Urban Growth Patterns on Transportation Energy Consumption. Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Aug. 1980.
16. Kim, K.-S., and J. B. Schneider. Defining Relationships Between Urban Form and Travel Energy. In Transportation Research Record 1049, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 43-50.
17. Cheslow, M. D., and J. K. Neels. Effect of Urban Development Patterns on Transportation Energy Use. In Transportation Research Record 764, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 70-78.
18. Making the Land Use Transportation Air Quality Connection: Analysis of Alternatives, Vol. 5. 1,000 Friends of Oregon, Portland, May 1996.
19. Johnston, R. A., C. J. Rodier, J. E. Abraham, and J. D. Hunt. Applying an Integrated Model to the Evaluation of Travel Demand Management Policies in the Sacramento Region: Year Two. Mineta Transportation Institute, College of Business, San Jose State University, San Jose. Calif., Sept. 2001.
20. Walters, G., R. Ewing, and W. Schroeer. Adjusting Computer Modeling Tools to Capture Effects of Smart Growth: "Poking at the Project Like a Lab Rat." In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, No. 1722, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 17-26.
21. EPA Guidance: Improving Air Quality Through Land Use Activities. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Jan. 2001.
22. Atlantic Steel Redevelopment. Project XL Progress Report, EPA 100-R-00-026. Office of the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Jan. 2001.
23. Zegras, C., and R. Gakenheimer. Urban Growth Management for Mobility: The Case of the Santiago, Chile, Metropolitan Region. MIT Cooperative Mobility Program and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Mass., 2000.
24. Ampt, E. S., and J. de D. Ortúzar. On Best Practices in Continuous Large-Scale Mobility Surveys. Transport Reviews, Vol. 24, No. 3, May 2004, pp. 337-363.
25. Martínez, F. MUSSA: Land Use Model for Santiago City. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 126-134.
26. Martínez, F., and P. Donoso. Modeling Land Use Planning Effects: Zone Regulations and Subsidies. In Travel Behaviour Research: The Leading Edge (D. Hensher, ed.), Pergamon-Elsevier, New York, 2001, pp. 647-658.
27. Zegras, C. Sustainable Urban Mobility: Exploring the Role of the Built Environment. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2005.
28. Weisbrod, G., S. Lerman, and M. Ben-Akiva. Tradeoffs in Residential Location Decisions: Transportation Versus Other Factors. Transport Policy and Decision Making, Vol. 1, 1980, pp. 13-26.
29. Kitamura, R., P. L. Mokhtarian, and L. Laidet A Micro-Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 125-158.