Sketch transit modeling based on 2000 census data

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1986, 2006, Pages 182-189

  Marshall, Norm ^a   Grady, Brian ^a  

^a Smart Mobility Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION; TRANSIT SKETCH MODELS;

HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 33947595694     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1986-24     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual. Travel Model Improvement Program, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
2. Report on Findings of the Second Peer Review Panel for the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Transportation Model Improvement Program, 2004.
3. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87-114.
4. Vellinga, M. L. Blueprint for a Valley. Planning, May 2004, pp. 13-17.
5. System Planning for Quality Transit Projects. Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Planning Association, San Francisco, Calif., March 2005.
6. Report on Findings of the Third Peer Review Panel for the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC). Transportation Model Improvement Program, 2004.
7. Pratt, R. H., Texas Transportation Institute, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., SG Associates, Inc., and McCollom Management Consulting, Inc. TCRP Project B-12: Travelers Response to Transportation System Changes Interim Handbook. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., March 2000.
8. Thompson, G. L. Achieving Suburban Transit Potential: Sacramento Revisited. In Transportation Research Record 1571, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 151-160.
9. Walters, G., and R. Cervero. Forecasting Transit Demand in a Fast Growing Corridor: The Direct-Ridership Model Approach. Aug. 1, 2003. www.ce.berkeley.edu/~yuli/ce259/reader/Direct%20Ridership% 20Forcast.pdf. Accessed Sept. 25, 2006.
10. Flyvbjerg, B., M. K. Skamris Hom, and S. L. Buhl. How (In)accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 71, No. 2, Spring 2005, pp. 131-146.
11. Marshall, N., and K. Ballard. New Distribution and Mode Choice Models for Chicago. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1998.
12. Marshall, N., and B. Grady. Travel Demand Modeling for Regional Visioning and Scenario Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 44-52.
13. Mode Choice Model Documentation. In Integrated Regional Model Project. Denver Regional Council on Governments, Denver, Colo., Dec. 2004, pp. 10-11.
14. Revised Departmental Guidance: Valuation of Travel Time in Economic Analysis. U.S. Department of Transportation, Feb. 2003.
15. Cervero, R. Built Environments and Mode Choice: Toward a Normative Framework. Transportation Research D, Vol. 7, 2002, pp. 265-284.
16. Cervero, R. Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Planning Association, San Francisco, Calif., 2005.
17. COG/TPB Travel Forecasting Model, Version 2.1. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Sept. 17, 2004.
18. Breakthrough Technologies Institute and Environmental Defense. Changing Lanes: Linking Bus Rapid Transit and High Occupancy Toll Networks in Northern Virginia. Sept. 21, 2005. www.gobrt.org/BRT-HOTFinalReport.pdf. Accessed Sept. 25, 2006.