Travel demand modeling for regional visioning and scenario analysis

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1921, 2005, Pages 44-52

  Marshall, Norm ^a   Grady, Brian ^a  

^a Smart Mobility Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

QUALITY TRANSIT SERVICE; REGIONAL VISIONING; ROADWAY CAPACITY;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 33645299825     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1921-06     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Deakin, Harvey, Skabardonis, Inc., Manual of Regional Transportation Modeling Practice for Air Quality Analysis. National Association of Regional Councils, Washington, D.C., July 1993, p. 1-1-1-2.
2. Vision 2030: Shaping the Region's Future Together. Baltimore Metropolitan Council. www.baltometro.org/Vision2030.html. Accessed 2002.
3. The Metropolis Plan: Choices for the Chicago Region. Chicago Metropolis 2020. www.metropolisplan.org. Accessed 2003.
4. A Vision for Central Texas. Envision Central Texas, www. envisioncentraltexas.org. Accessed May 2004.
5. Vellinga, M. L. Blueprint for a Valley. Planning, May 2004, pp. 13-17.
6. Four Scenarios for the Future. Presented at Choices for Our Future: Regional Forum 2004. Sacramento Area Council of Governments and Valley Vision, Sacramento, Calif., 2004. www.sacog.org/forum2004/home.cfm.
7. Southern California Compass Growth Vision Report. Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, Calif., June 2004.
8. Executive Summary. In Destination 2030. Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, April 2004.
9. Scenario Planning Roundtable. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. April 2004. www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/tpu0404.htm#sp.
10. Dittmar, H., and S. Poticha. Defining Transit-Oriented Development: The New Regional Building Block. In The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development (H. Dittmar and G. Ohland, eds.). Island Press, Washington D.C., 2004, pp. 19-40.
11. Ewing, R., and R. B. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment: Synthesis. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
12. The Location Efficient Mortgage Project: Summary of Results of Location and Auto Cost Correlation Study. Center for Neighborhood Technologies, Chicago, III., 1998.
13. DeAnna, M., R. Ewing, and S.-C. Li. A Household Life Style Model for FSUTMS. www.ulam.org/lifestyleadj2.htm.
14. Killingsworth, R. E., A. De Nazelle, and R. H. Bell. Building a New Paradigm: Improving Public Health Through Transportation. ITE Journal, June 2003, pp. 28-32.
15. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. New York Best Practice Model (NYBPM): Transportation Models and Data Initiative General Final Report, Draft. New York Metropolitan Transportation Council, June 22, 2004.
16. Coogan. M. Why Care About Walking? A Celebration of the NHTS. nhts.ornl.gov/2001/presentations/walking/index.shtml.
17. Mucsi, K., and A. M. Khan. Effectiveness of Additional Lanes at Signalized Intersections. ITE Journal, Jan. 2003, pp. 26-30.
18. Horowitz, A. J. Delay-Volume Relations for Travel Forecasting: Based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1991. tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/general/dvrt/dvrt.pdf.
19. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
20. DeCorla-Souza, P., and H. Cohen. Accounting for Induced Travel in Metropolitan Highway Expansion. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1998.
21. Ortúzar, J. de D., and L. G. Willumsen. Modeling Transport, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2001.
22. National Household Travel Survey. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001. www.bts.gov/programs/ national_household_travel_survey/.
23. CAMPO: Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Austin, Tex., 2005. www.campotexas.org/.