Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing cement plant using MEA scrubbing

International Journal of Green Energy

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 197-220

  Hassan, S M Nazmul ^a   Douglas, Peter ^a   Croiset, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aspen Plus; Cement plant; CO2 capture; Economic evaluation; Icarus; MEA; Process simulation

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; CEMENT PLANTS; ECONOMICS; SCRUBBERS; WASTE HEAT UTILIZATION;

ECONOMIC EVALUATION; MONOETHANOLAMINE; PROCESS SIMULATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ADSORPTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CEMENT; INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; NATURAL GAS;

EID: 33947588352     PISSN: 15435075     EISSN: 15435083     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01971520600873418     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Afshin, M., Collas, P., Blain, D., Ha, C., Liang, C. and Mcdonald, L. (2004) Canada's Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2002, Greenhouse Gas Division, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
2. Alie, C., Backham, L., Croiset, E. and Douglas, P. L. (2005) Simulation of CO2 capture using MEA scrubbing: A flowsheet decomposition method. Energy Conversion Management, 46:2, pp. 475-487.
3. Aspen Plus (2003) Aspen Plus User Guide, Cambridge, Aspen Technology Limited, Massachusetts
4. Asrarita, G., Marrucci, G. and Gioia, F. (1964) The influence of carbonation ratio and total amine concentration on carbon dioxide absorbtion in aqueous monoethanolamine solutions. Chem. Eng. Science, 19, p. 95.
5. Barchas, R. and Davis, R. (1992) Energy conversion and Management, 33:58, pp. 341-348.
6. Chakma, A., Mehrotra, K. and Nielsen, B. (1995) Comparison of chemical solvents for mitigating CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. Heat Recovery Systems and CHP, 15:2, pp. 231-240.
7. Desideri, U. and Paolucci, A. (1999) Performance Modelling of a Carbon Dioxide Removal System For Power Plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 40, pp. 1899-1915.
8. Humphreys, K. K. and Mahasenan, N. (2001) Towards a sustainable cement industry: Substudy 8, climate change, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Conches-Geneva, Switzerland
9. Icarus Process Evaluator (2003) Icarus Process Evaluator User Manual, Aspen Technology Limited, Cambridge, Massachusetts
10. IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis; Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
11. James, L., Riggs, W., Rentz, F., Kahl, A. L. and West, T. M. (1986) Engineering Economics,, pp. 43-54. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
12. Mahasenan, N., Smith, S. and Humphreys, K. K. (1899) The Cement Industry and Global Climate Change: Current and Potential Future Cement Industry CO2 Emissions, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Battelle, Richland, WA
13. Mariz, C. L. (1998) Carbon Dioxide Recovery: Large Scale Design Trends. The Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 37:7, pp. 42-47.
14. Nsakala, N., Marion, J., Guha, M., Plasynski, S., Johnson, H. and Gupta, J. (2001) Engineering Feasibility of CO2 Capture on an Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plant. First Conference on Carbon Sequestration Washington, D.C.
15. 2 capture technology for power plant greehouse gas control. Environmental Science and Technology, 36:20, pp. 4467-4475.
16. Sada, E., Kumazawa, H. and Butt, M. A. (1976) Chemical Absorption of Carbon Dioxide into Aqueous Solutions of Monoethanolamine. AIChE J., 22, p. 196.
17. Simbeck, D. R. and McDonald (2000) Existing Coal Power Plant Retrofit CO2 Control Options Analysis. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Cairns, Australia
18. 2 recycle combustion. Energy Conversion and Management, 44, pp. 3073-3091.