Asexual and sexual hybrids between Fundulus diaphanus and F. heteroclitus in the Canadian Atlantic region

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1467-1480

  Hernández Chávez, Cecilia ^a   Turgeon, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Asexual reproduction; Fundulus; Gynogenesis; Hybridization; Microsatellites

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PRIMER DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; HISTOLOGY; HYBRIDIZATION; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; FUNDULIDAE; GENETICS, POPULATION; HAPLOTYPES; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MAINE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; NOVA SCOTIA; PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; FUNDULUS; FUNDULUS DIAPHANUS; FUNDULUS HETEROCLITUS;

EID: 33947524069     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03239.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Able KW, Palmer RE (1988) Salinity effects on fertilization success and larval mortality of Fundulus heteroclitus. Copeia, 2, 345-350.
2. Adams SM, Oleksiak MF, Duvernell D (2005) Microsatellite primers for the Atlantic coastal killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus, with applicability to related Fundulus species. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 275-277.
3. April J, Turgeon J (2006) Phylogeography of the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus): glacial races and secondary contact. Journal of Fish Biology, 19(Suppl. B), 212-228.
4. Arnold ML (1997) Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Beaumont M, Barratt EM, Gottelli D et al. (2001) Genetic diversity and introgression in the Scottish wildcat. Molecular Ecology, 10, 319-336.
6. Bell G (1982) The Masterpiece of Nature. Croom-Helm, London.
7. Bernardi G, Talley D (2000) Genetic evidence for limited dispersal in the coastal California killifish, Fundulus parvipinnis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 255, 187-199.
8. Bernatchez L, Glémet H, Wilson CC, Danzmann RG (1995) Introgression and fixation of Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) mitochondrial genome in an allopatric population of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 52, 179-185.
9. Beukeboom LW, Vrijenhoek RC (1998) Evolutionary genetics and ecology of sperm-dependent parthenogenesis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 11, 755-782.
10. Campton DE (1987) Natural hybridization and introgression in fishes: methods of detection and genetic interpretations. In: Population Genetics and Fishery Management (eds Ryman N, Utter F), pp. 161-192. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.
11. Cossins AR, Crawford DL (2005) Fish as models for environmental genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 324-333.
12. Dawley RM (1992) Clonal hybrids of the common laboratory fish Fundulus heteroclitus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 2485-2488.
13. Dawley RM, Chrzanowski D, Phiel KL, Beaulieu K, Goddard KA (1999) Allozyme analysis of clonal diversity among unisexual hybrids of the killifishes Fundulus diaphanus and F. heteroclitus. Journal of Heredity, 90, 607-612.
14. Dawley RM, Yeakel AM, Beaulieu KA, Phiel KL (2000) Histocompatibility analysis of clonal diversity unisexual hybrids of the killifishes Fundulus heteroclitus and Fundulus diaphanus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 923-930.
15. DeMarais BD, Dowling TE, Douglas ME, Minckley WL, Marsh PC (1992) Origin of Gila seminuda (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) through introgressive hybridization: implications for evolution and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 2747-2751.
16. Doeringsfeld MR, Schlosser IJ, Elder JF, Evenson DP (2004) Phenotypic consequences of genetic variation in a gynogenetic complex of Phoxinus eos-neogaeus clonal fish (Pisces: Cyprinidae) inhabiting a heterogeneous environment. Evolution, 58, 1261-1273.
17. Fournier P, Magnin E (1975) Reproduction du petit barré de l'est Fundulus diaphanus diaphanus (Le Sueur). Le Naturaliste Canadien, 102, 181-187.
18. Fox JA, Dybdahl MF, Jokela J, Lively CM (1996) Genetic structure of coexisting sexual and clonal subpopulations in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Evolution, 50, 1541-1548.
19. Fritz ES, Garside ET (1974a) Identification and description of hybrids of Fundulus heteroclitus and F. diaphanus (Pisces: Cyrinodontidae) from Porter's Lake, Nova Scotia, with evidence for absence of backcrossing. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 52, 1433-1442.
20. Fritz ES, Garside ET (1974b) Salinity preferences of Fundulus heteroclitus and F. diaphanus (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae): their role in geographic distribution. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 52, 997-1003.
21. Grant V (1981) Plant Speciation, 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New York.
22. Gray MM, Weeks SC (2001) Niche breadth in clonal and sexual fish (Poeciliopsis): a test of the frozen niche variation model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 1313-1318.
23. Griffith RW (1974) Environment and salinity tolerance in the genus Fundulus. Copeia, 2, 319-331.
24. Hakoyama HT, Nishimura N, Matsubara N, Iguchi K (2001) Differences in parasite load and nonspecific immune reaction between sexual and gynogenetic forms of Carassius auratus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 72, 401-407.
25. Hamilton WD (1980) Sex, versus no sex, versus parasites. Oikos, 35, 282-290.
26. Helleday T (2003) Pathways for mitotic homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mutation Research, 532, 103-115.
27. Hoare DJ, Ruxton GD, Godin JCJ, Krause J (2000) The social organization of free-ranging fish shoals. Oikos, 89, 546-554.
28. Hotz H, Mancino G, Bucci-Innocenti S et al. (1985) Rana ridibunda varies geographically in inducing clonal gametogenesis in interspecies hybrids. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 236, 199-210.
29. Hubbs CL (1955) Hybridization between fish species in nature. Systematic Zoology, 4, 1-20.
30. Kondrashov AS (1993) Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. Journal of Heredity, 84, 372-387.
31. Lee W-J, Conroy J, Howell WH, Kocher TD (1995) Structure and evolution of teleost mitochondrial control regions. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 41, 54-66.
32. Mallet J (2005) Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 229-237.
33. Mee JA, Rowe L (2006) A comparison of parasite loads on sexual and asexual Phoxinus (Pisces: Cypridinae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 84, 804-816.
34. Oleksiak MF, Churchill GA, Crawford DL (2002) Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations. Nature Genetics, 32, 261-266.
35. Paetkau D, Waits LP, Clarkson PL et al. (1998) Variation in genetic diversity across the range of North American brown bears. Conservation Biology, 12, 418-429.
36. Palmer RE, Able KW (1987) Effect of acclimation to salinity on fertilization success in the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus. Physiological Zoology, 60, 614-621.
37. Park SDE (2001) Microsatelite toolkit, trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection. PhD thesis, University of Dublin.
38. Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P (2005) Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 847-859.
39. Powers DA, Smith M, González-Villaseñor I et al. (1993) A multidisciplinary approach to the selectionist/neutralist controversy using the model teleost, Fundulus heteroclitus. In: Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology (eds Futuyama D, Antonovics J), Vol. 9, pp. 43-107. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
40. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959.
41. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
42. Rey O (2006) Structure génétique du fondule barré (Fundulus diaphanus) dans le fleuve Saint-Laurent. MSc thesis, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
43. Rice WR (1989) Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223-225.
44. Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity, 83, 363-372.
45. Sambrook J, Russel D (2001) Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
46. Schartl M, Nanda I, Schlupp I et al. (1995) Incorporation of subgenomic amounts of DNA as compensation for mutational load in a gynogenetic fish. Nature, 373, 68-71.
47. Schlosser IJ, Doeringsfeld MR, Elder JF, Arzayus LF (1998) Niche relationships of clonal and sexual fish in a heterogeneous landscape. Ecology, 79, 953-968.
48. Schlupp I (2005) The evolutionary ecology of gynogenesis. Annual Review of Ecology and Evolution, 36, 399-417.
49. Scott WB, Crossman EJ (1973) Freshwater fishes of Canada. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 184, 1-1092.
50. Scott GR, Rogers JT, Richards JG, Wood CM, Schulte PM (2004) Intraspecific divergence of ionoregulatory physiology in the euryhaline teleost Fundulus heteroclitus: possible mechanisms of freshwater adaptation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 207, 3399-3410.
51. Scribner KT, Page KS, Barton ML (2001) Hybridization in freshwater fishes: a review of case studies and cytonuclear methods of biological inference. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 10, 293-323.
52. Seehausen O (2004) Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 198-207.
53. Tiedemann R, Moll K, Paulus B, Schlupp I (2005) New microsatellite loci confirm hybrid origin, parthenogenetic inheritance, and mitotic gene conversion in the gynogenetic Amazon molly (Poecilia formosa). Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 586-589.
54. Tobler M, Wahli T, Schlupp I (2005) Comparison of parasite communities in native and introduced populations of sexual and asexual mollies of the genus Poecilia. Journal of Fish Biology, 67, 1072-1082.
55. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 535-538.
56. Verspoor E, Hammar J (1991) Introgressive hybridization in fishes: the biochemical evidence. Journal of Fish Biology, 39, 309-334.
57. Vrijenhoek RC (1979) Factors affecting clonal diversity and coexistence. American Zoologist, 19, 787-797.
58. Vrijenhoek RC, Dawley RM, Cole CJ, Bogart JP (1989) A list of the known unisexual vertebrates. In: Evolution and cytology of unisexual vertebrates (eds Dawley RM, Bogart JP), pp. 19-23. New York State Museum, Albany, New York.
59. Vrijenhoek RC (1998) Animal clones and diversity. Bioscience, 48, 617-628.
60. Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Molecular Ecology, 10, 249-256.
61. Weeks SC (1996) A re-evaluation of the Red Queen model for the maintenance of sex in a clonal-sexual fish complex (Poeciliidae: Poeciliopsis). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53, 1157-1164.
62. West SA, Lively CM, Read AF (1999) A pluralist approach to sex and recombination. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 1003-1012.
63. Wirtz P (1999) Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Animal Behaviour, 58, 1-12.
64. Woods JG, Paetkau D, Lewis D et al. (1999) Genetic tagging of free-ranging black and brown bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27, 616-662.