Impact of management on weed species composition in organically cropped spring cereals

Biological Agriculture and Horticulture

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 257-274

  Riesinger, P ^a   Hyvonen T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b PLANT PRODUCTION RESEARCH   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; CEREAL; CROP ROTATION; CULTIVATION; MANURE; ORGANIC FARMING; SOIL FERTILITY; WEED CONTROL;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

ACER PENSYLVANICUM; CHENOPODIUM; CIRSIUM; CIRSIUM ARVENSE; CONVOLVULUS; ELYMUS; ELYMUS REPENS; FALLOPIA CONVOLVULUS; GALIUM; SONCHUS; SONCHUS ARVENSIS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; VIOLA ARVENSIS; VIOLACEAE;

EID: 33947518735     PISSN: 01448765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01448765.2006.9755025     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Albrecht, H., and Bachthaler, G., 1989. Unkrautsamengehalte und Bodeneigenschaften von Ackerflächen in Bayern. Weed Research, 30:101–108.
2. Andreasen, C., Streibig, J. C., and Haas, H., 1991. Soil properties affecting the distribution of 37 weed species in Danish fields. Weed Research, 31:181–187.
3. Anonymous. 1991. European Council Regulation (EC) No. 2092/91. http://www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/consleg/main/1991/en_1991R2092_index.html
4. Anonymous. 1999. European Council Regulation (EC) No. 1804/1999. http://www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/1999/1_222/1_22219990824en00010028.pdf
5. Anonymous. 2000a. Anvisningar för ekologisk Produktion—växtproduktion. Kasvintuotannon Tarkastuskeskus (Plant Production Inspection Centre). Loimaa, Finland. (In Swedish) http://www.mmm.fi/tuet/ohjeet−_oppaa_tiedonannot/oppaat/ymparisto/maatalouden_ymparistotukioppaat/Luomu%20ruotsi.pdf
6. Anonymous. 2000b. Anvisningar för ekologisk Produktion—animalieproduktion. Kasvintuotannon Tarkastuskeskus (Plant Production Inspection Centre). Loimaa, Finland. (In Swedish) http://www.mmm.fi/tuet/ohjeet_oppaat_tiedonannot/oppaat/ymparisto/maatalouden_ymparistotukioppaat/Luomu%20n.iotsi.pdf
7. Anomymous. 2003a. Maatilatilastollinen vuosikirja 2003 (Yearbook of Farm Statistics 2003). Helsinki, Finland:Maa-ja metsätalousministeriön tietopalvelukeskus (Information Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry).
8. Anonymous. 2003b. Luonnonmukainen maatalous 2002—Tilastoja (Organic Farming 2002—Statistics)., KTTKn julkaisuja. B2 Luomutuotanto 2 Loimaa, Finland:KTTK. http://www.kttk.fi/2003/sto/luomu_tilastoja/tijulk02.pdf
9. Anonymous. 2004. Climate data. Helsinki, Finland:FMI (Finnish Meteorological Institute).
10. Bàrberi, P., Silvestri, N., and Bonari, E., 1997. Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation. Weed Research, 37:301–313.
11. Bàrberi, P., Cozzani, A., Macchia, M., and Bonari, E., 1998. Size and composition of the weed seedbank under different management systems for continuous maize cropping. Weed Research, 38:319–334.
12. Bayer. 1992. Important Crops of the World and their Weeds, 2nd edn. Leverkusen, Germany:Bayer AG.
13. Becker, B., and Hurle, K., 1998. Unkrautflora auf Feldern mit unterschiedlich langer ökologischer Bewirtschaftung. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz., XVI:155–161.
14. Blackshaw, R. E., Brandt, R. N., Janzen, H. H., Entz, T., Grant, C. A., and Derksen, D., 2003. Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen. Weed Science, 51:532–539.
15. Blackshaw, R. E., and Rode, L. M., 1991. Effect of ensiling and rumen digestion by cattle on weed seed viability. Weed Science, 39:104–108.
16. Bond, W., and Lennartsson, M. E.K., 1999. “ Organic weed control—back to the future. ”. In Proceedings of the 1999 Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds 929–938.
17. Borg, R., 1964. Über die Beziehungen der Ackerunkräuter zu einigen bodenökologischen Faktoren in der Landgemeinde Helsinki. Annales Botanici Fennici, 1:146–160.
18. Boström, U., and Fogelfors, H., 1999. Type and time of autumn tillage with and without herbicides at reduced rates in Southern Sweden. Soil & Pillage Research, 50:283–293.
19. Bylterud, A., 1965. Mechanical and chemical control of Agropyron repens in Norway. Weed Research, 5:169–180.
20. Dale, M. R.T., Thomas, A. G., and John, E. A., 1992. Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Canadian Journal of Botany, 70:1931–1939.
21. Davies, D. H.K., Christal, A., Talbot, M., Lawson, H. M., and Wright, G. McN., 1997. “ Changes in weed populations in the conversion of two arable farms to organic farming. ”. In Proceedings of the 1997 Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds 973–978.
22. Didon, M. E.U., 2002. Growth and development of barley cultivais in relation to weed competition. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Agraria, 332 (PhD thesis). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Uppsala, Sweden
23. Dieleman, J. A., Mortensen, D. A., Buhler, D. D., Cambardella, C. A., and Moorman, T. B., 2000. Identifying associations among site properties and weed species abundance. I. Multivariate analysis. Weed Science, 48:567–575.
24. Dock-Gustavsson, A.-M., 1997. Growth and regenerative capacity of plants of. Cirsium arvense. Weed Research, 37:229–236.
25. Doucet, C., Weaver, S. E., Hamill, A. S., and Zhang, Z., 1999. Seperating the effects of crop rotation from weed management on weed density and diversity. Weed Science, 47:729–735.
26. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H. E., Düll, R., Wirth, W., Werner, W., and Paulißen, D., 1991. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica, 18:1–248.
27. Erviö, L.-R., 1972. Growth of weeds in cereal populations. Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society in Finland, 44:19–28.
28. Erviö, L.-R., 1983. Competition between barley and annual weeds at different sowing densities. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae, 22:232–239.
29. Erviö, L.-R., and Salonen, J., 1987. Changes in the weed population of spring cereals in Finland. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae, 26:201–226.
30. Erviö, R., Hyvärinen, S., Erviö, L.-R., and Salonen, J., 1994. Soil properties affecting weed distribution in spring cereal and vegetable fields. Agricultural Science in Finland, 3:497–504.
31. Freyer, B., 1991. Ökologischer Landbau—Planung und Analyse von Betriebsurnstellungen. Ökologie & Landwirtschaft Vol. 2, Weikersheim, Germany:Verlag Josef Markgraf.
32. Geng, S., Hess, C. E., and Auburn, J., 1990. Sustainable agricultural systems, concepts and definitions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 165:73–85.
33. Granstedt, A., 1990. “ Fallstudier av kväveförsörjning i alternativ odling. PhD thesis. ”. In Alternativ odling, 4 Uppsala, Sweden:Research Committee for Alternative Agriculture, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (English summary)
34. Haas, H., and Streibig, J. C., 1982. “ Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. ”. In Herbicide Resistance in Plants Edited by:LeBaron, H. M., and Gressel, J., 57–79. New York, U.S.A.:John Wiley & Sons.
35. Habel, W., 1954. Über die Wirkungsweise der Eggen gegen Samenunkräuter sowie die Empfindlichkeit der Unkrautarten und ihrer Altersstadien gegen den Eggvorgang. Dissertation. Stuttgart, Germany:Landwirtschaftliche Universitet Hohenheim.
36. Haid, A. B., 1999a. Weed vegetation (wild flora) of long established organic versus conventional cereal fields in Denmark. Annals of Applied Biology, 134:307–314.
37. Hald, A. B., 1999b. The impact of changing the season in which cereals are sown on the diversity of the weed flora in rotational fields in Denmark. Journal of Applied Ecology, 36:24–32.
38. Hallgren, E., 1996. Occurrence of broad-leaved weeds on different soils in different crops in Sweden. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research, 26:115–123.
39. Hallgren, E., Palmer, M. W., and Milberg, P., 1999. Data diving with cross validation, an investigation of broad-scale gradients in Swedish weed communities. Journal of Ecology, 87:1037–1051.
40. Hämet-Ahti, L., Suominen, J., Ulvinen, T., and Uotila, P., 1998. Retkeilykasvio. (Field Flora of Finland). Helsinki, Finland:Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum.
41. Hoveland, C. S., Buchanan, G. A., and Harris, M. C., 1976. Response of weeds to soil phosphorus and potassium. Weed Science, 24:194–201.
42. Hyvönen, T., and Salonen, J., 2002. Weed species diversity and community composition in cropping practices at two intensity levels—a six-year experiment. Plant Ecology, 159:73–81.
43. Hyvönen, T., Ketoja, E., Salonen, J., Jalli, H., and Tiainen, J., 2003. Weed species diversity and community composition in organic and conventional cropping of spring cereals. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 97:131–149.
44. Hyvönen, T., Holopainen, J., and Tiainen, J., 2005. Detecting the spatial component of variation in the weed community at the farm scale with variation partitioning by canonical correspondence analysis. Weed Research, 45:48–56.
45. 15N fertilizer dilution in field experiments with barley as a reference crop. Plant and Soil, 92:3–13.
46. 2 fixation and interspecific competition for soil inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant and Soil, 182:25–38.
47. Kakriainen-Rouhiainen, S., Väisänen, J., Vanhala, P., and Lötjönen, T., 2003. “ Mid-summer bare fallow effective in controlling perennial weeds. ”. In Nordic Agriculture in Global Perspective, Proceedings of the NJF's 22nd. Congress Edited by:Niemeläinen, O., and Topi-Hulmi, M., 104Tampere, Finland:Tampere University Print.
48. Kauppila, R., 1990. Conventional and organic cropping systems at Suitia IV:weeds. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland, 62:331–337.
49. Kees, H., 1962. Untersuchungen zur Unkrautbekämpfung durch Netzegge und Stoppelbearbeitungsmassnahmen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des leichten Bodens, Dissertation. Stuttgart, Germany:Landwirtschaftliche Universitet Hohenheim.
50. Koch, W., 1959. Untersuchungen zur Unkrautbekämpfung durch Saatpflege und Stoppelbearbeitungsmassnahmen. Dissertation. Stuttgart, Germany:Landwirtschaftliche Universitet Hohenheim.
51. Lazauskas, P., 1994. Theoretische Basis für die Unkrautbekämpfung im Ökologischen Landbau. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, XIV:327–332.
52. Leeson, J. Y., Sheard, J. W., and Thomas, A. G., 2000. Weed communities associated with arable Saskatchewan farm management systems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 80:177–185.
53. Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B., Cousens, R. D., and Coombes, N. E., 1996. The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Research, 36:505–513.
54. Lepš, J., and Šmilauer, P., 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO. Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge University Press.
55. Mahn, E.-G., 1988. Changes in the structure of weed communities affected by agro-chemicals—what role does nitrogen play? Copenhagen 1988. Ecological Bulletins, 39:71–73.
56. Mela, T., 1988. Luonnonmukainen peltoviljely Suomessa. Viljelymenetelmät, rikkakasvit, peltojen viljavuus, sadot ja sadon laatu (Organic fanning in Finland. Cultivation methods, weeds, soil fertility, yields and yield quality). Department of Plant Husbandry. Publications Vol. 16, Helsinki, Finland:University of Helsinki. (English summary)
57. Merrill, M. C., 1983. Eco-agriculture, a review of its history and philosophy. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 1:181–210.
58. Milberg, P., Hallgren, E., and Palmer, M. W., 2000. Interannual variation in weed biomass on arable land in Sweden. Weed Research, 40:311–321.
59. Mukula, J., Raatikainen, M., Lallukka, R., and Raatikainen, T., 1969. Composition of weed flora in spring cereals in Finland. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae, 8:59–110.
60. Mukula, J., and Rantanen, O., 1987. Climatic risks to the yield and quality of field crops in Finland. I. Basic facts about Finnish field crop production. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae, 26:1–18.
61. Mäder, P., Fliessbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P., and Niggli, U., 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science, 296:1694–1697.
62. Ottabong, E., and Lindén, B., 1993. Nitrogen transformations and nitrogen control in cultivated organic soils. A review. International Peat Journal, 5:75–95.
63. Pekrun, C., and Lutman, P. J.W., 1998. The influence of post-harvest cultivation on the persistence of volunteer oilseed rape. Aspects of Applied Biology, 51:113–118.
64. Peltonen, S., 2003. Peltokasvien kasvinsuojelu 2003 (Plant protection for arable crops). Julkaisuja 1000. Jyväskylä, Finland:ProAgria Maaseutukeskusten Liiton.
65. Peltonen, S., 2004. Peltokasvien kasvinsuojelu 2004 (Plant protection for arable crops)., Julkaisuja 1000 Jyväskylä, Finland:ProAgria Maaseutukeskusten Liiton.
66. Poutala, R. T., Korva, J., and Varis, E., 1993. Spring wheat cultivai” performance in ecological and conventional cropping systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 3:63–84.
67. Pyšek, P., and Lepš, J., 1991. Response of a weed community to nitrogen fertilization, a multivariate analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2:237–244.
68. Rantzau, R., Freyer, B., and Vogtmann, H., 1990. “ Umstellung auf ökologischen Landbau. ”. In Schriftenreihe des Bundesministers für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Porsten. Reihe A, Angewandte Wissenschaft Vol. 389, Münster-Hiltrup, Germany:Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH.
69. Rasmussen, J., and Ascard, J., 1995. “ Weed control in organic farming systems. ”. In Ecology and Integrated Farming Systems Edited by:Glen, D. M., Greaves, M. P., and Anderson, H. M., 49–67. New York, U.S.A.:John Wiley & Sons.
70. Rasmussen, K., Holst, N., and Kristensen, I. S., 1998. “ Weeds at eight organic livestock farms—significant factors for weed dynamics 1989–1996. ”. In 15th Danish plant protection conference. Side effect of pesticides, weeds. DJF-Rapport, Markbrug Vol. 2, 203–217. Denmark:Danmarks Jordbrugsforskning; Foulum. (In Danish)
71. Rydberg, N. T., and Milberg, P., 2000. A survey of weeds in organic fanning in Sweden. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 18:175–185.
72. Salonen, J., 1993. Weed infestation and factors affecting weed incidence in spring cereals in Finland—a multivariate approach. Agricultural Science Finland, 2:525–536.
73. Salonen, J., Hyvönen, T., and Jalli, H., 2001. Weed flora in organically grown spring cereals in Finland. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland, 10:231–242.
74. Savela, M.-L., Hynninen, E.-L., and Blomqvist, H., 2002. Pesticide sales in Finland in 2001. Kemia-Kemi, 29:61–63.
75. Sjursen, H., 2001. Change of the weed seed bank during the first complete six-course crop rotation after conversion from conventional to organic farming. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 19:71–90.
76. Skuterud, R., Semb, K., Saur, J., and Mygland, S., 1996. Impact of reduced tillage on the weed flora in spring cereals. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10:519–532.
77. Swanton, C. J., Shrestha, A., Roy, R. C., Ball-Coelho, B. R., and Knezevic, S. Z., 1999. Effect of tillage systems, N, and cover crop on the composition of weed flora. Weed Science, 47:454–461.
78. ter Braak, C. J.F., and Šmilauer, P., 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows:Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4). Ithaca, New York, U.S.A.:Microcomputer Power.
79. Tereshchuk, V., and Lazauskas, P., 2002. Weed control in manure by composting. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, XVIII:647–651.
80. Vanhala, P., and Pitkänen, J., 1998. Long-term effects of primary tillage on above-ground weed flora and on the weed-seedbank. Aspects of Applied Biology, 51:99–104.
81. Vuorinen, J., and Mäkitie, O., 1955. The method of soil testing in use in Finland. Agrogeological Publications, 63:1–44.
82. Walter, A. M., Christensen, S., and Simmelsgaard, S. E., 2002. Spatial correlation between weed species densities and soil properties. Weed Research, 42:26–38.
83. Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, G. F., 1974. A decimal code for the growth stage of cereals. Weed Research, 14:415–121.