Detecting the spatial component of variation in the weed community at the farm scale with variation partitioning by canonical correspondence analysis

Weed Research

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 48-56

  Hyvonen T ^a   Holopainen, J ^b   Tiainen, J ^b  

^a PLANT PRODUCTION RESEARCH   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Crop; Farm scale; Finland; Multivariate ordination; Partial CCA; Weed species composition

Indexed keywords

CANONICAL ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; ORDINATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WEED;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; WORLD;

AVENA; BRASSICA RAPA; BRASSICA RAPA SUBSP. RAPA; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 13544258831     PISSN: 00431737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2004.00430.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AHTI T, HÄMET-AHTI L & JALAS J (1968) Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici 5, 169-211.
2. BÀRBERI P, SILVESTRI N & BONARI E (1997) Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation. Weed Research 37, 301-313.
3. BORCARD D, LEGENDRE P & DRAPEAU P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73, 1045-1055.
4. TER BRAAK CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67, 1167-1179.
5. TER BRAAK CJF (1988) Partial canonical correspondence analysis. In: Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis. (ed. HH Block), 551-558. North Holland Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
6. TER BRAAK CJF & ŠMILAUER P (1998) CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA.
7. CARDINA J, JOHNSON GA & SPARROW DH (1997) The nature and consequence of weed spatial distribution. Weed Science 45, 364-373.
8. COUSENS R & MORTIMER M (1995) Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. DALE MRT (1999) Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. DALE MRT, THOMAS AG & JOHN EA (1992) Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Canadian Journal of Botany 70, 1931-1939.
11. DERKSEN DA, LAFOND GP, THOMAS AG, LOEPPKY HA & SWANTON CJ (1993) Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Science 41, 409-417.
12. DIELEMAN JA, MORTENSEN DA, BUHLER DD, CAMBARDELLA CA & MOORMAN TB (2000) Identifying associations among site properties and weed species abundance. I. Multivariate analysis. Weed Science 48, 567-575.
13. DOUCET C, WEAVER SE, HAMILL AS & ZHANG J (1999) Separating the effects of crop rotation from weed management on weed density and diversity. Weed Science 47, 729-735.
14. ERVIÖ R, HYVÄRINEN S, ERVIÖ L-R & SALONEN J (1994) Soil properties affecting weed distribution in spring cereal and vegetable fields. Agricultural Science in Finland 3, 497-504.
15. HALLGREN E, PALMER MW & MILBERG P (1999) Data diving with cross-validation: an investigation of broad-scale gradients in Swedish weed communities. Journal of Ecology 87, 1037-1051.
16. HUME L (1987) Long-term effects of 2,4-D application on plants. I. Effects on the weed community in a wheat crop. Canadian Journal of Botany 65, 2530-2536.
17. HYVÖNEN T, HOLOPAINEN J & TIAINEN J (2000) Spatial variation of weed diversity in a patch of farmland. In: Proceedings 2000 XIth International Conference on Weed Biology, Dijon, France, 135-141. AFPP, Paris, France.
18. LEESON JY, SHEARD JW & THOMAS AG (2000) Weed communities associated with arable Saskatchewan farm management systems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 80, 177-185.
19. LEGENDRE P (1990) Quantitative methods and biogeographic analysis. In: Evolutionary Biogeography of the Marine Algae of the North Atlantic, NATO ASI Series, Vol. G22, (eds DJ Garbary & RR South), 9-34. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
20. LEGENDRE P & LEGENDRE L (1998) Numerical Ecology. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
21. MILBERG P, HALLGREN E & PALMER MW (2001) Timing of disturbance and vegetation development: how sowing date affects the weed flora in spring-sown crops. Journal of Vegetation Science 12, 93-98.
22. ØKLAND RH (1999) On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. Journal of Vegetation Science 10, 131-136.
23. ØKLAND RH & EILERTSEN O (1994) Canonical correspondence analysis with partitioning: some comments and an application. Journal of Vegetation Science 5, 117-126.
24. REW LJ & COUSENS RD (2001) Spatial distribution of weeds in arable crops: are current sampling and analytical methods appropriate? Weed Research 41, 1-18.
25. SALONEN J (1993) Weed infestation and factors affecting weed incidence in spring cereals in Finland - a multivariate approach. Agricultural Science in Finland 6, 525-536.
26. WALTER AM, CHRISTENSEN S & SIMMELSGAARD SE (2002) Spatial correlation between weed species densities and soil properties. Weed Research 42, 26-38.