Morphology optimization of CCVD-synthesized multiwall carbon nanotubes, using statistical design of experiments

Nanotechnology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2007, Pages

  Nourbakhsh, Amirhasan ^a   Ganjipour, Bahram ^a   Zahedifar, Mostafa ^a   Arzi, Ezatollah ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASHAN   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION; MORPHOLOGY; NANOREACTORS; OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CATALYTIC CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION (CCVD); FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL DESIGN (FFD); RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSM); STATISTICAL DESIGN;

MULTIWALLED CARBON NANOTUBES (MWCN);

MULTI WALLED NANOTUBE;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CATALYST; FLOW RATE; MORPHOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; VAPORIZATION;

EID: 33947513010     PISSN: 09574484     EISSN: 13616528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/18/11/115715     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Iijima S 1991 Nature 354 56-8
2. Ebbeson T W 1997 Carbon Nanotubes-Preparation and Properties (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press)
3. Saito R, Dresselhaus G and Dresselhaus M S 1998 Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes (London: Imperial College Press)
4. Rodriguez N M, Kim M S and Baker R T K 1994 J. Phys. Chem. 98 13108-11
5. Che G, Lakshmi B B, Martin C R and Fisher E R 1999 Metal-nanocluster- filled carbon nanotubes. Catalytic properties and possible applications in electrochemical energy storage and production Langmuir 15 750-8
6. Huczko A 2002 Appl. Phys. A 74 617-38
7. Park J B et al 2002 J. Cryst. Growth 244 211-7
8. Lee C J, Lyu S C, Kim H W, Park C Y and Yang C W 2002 Chem. Phys. Lett. 359 109-14
9. Chen M, Chen C M and Chen C F 2002 J. Mater. Sci. 37 3561-7
10. Ren Z F et al 1998 Science 282 1105-7
11. Endo M, Takeuchi K, Igarashi S, Kobori K, Shiraishi M and Kroto H W 1993 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 54 1841-8
12. Goh T N 2001 J. Appl. Stat. 28 391-8
13. Anderson M and Whitcomb P 2004 RSM Simplified, Optimizing Processes Using Response Surface Methods for Design of Experiments (NY: Productivity Press)
14. Harmon L 2003 J. Mater. Sci. 38 4479-85
15. Barglik-Chory C, Strohm C R H and Muller G 2004 J. Phys. Chem. B 108 7637-40
16. Zamostny P and Belohlav Z 2002 Appl. Catal. A 225 291-9
17. Gao R, Wang Z, Bai Z, Heer W, Dai L and Gao M 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 622-5
18. Kukovecz A, Mehn D, Nemes-Nagy E, Szabo R and Kiricsi I 2005 Carbon 43 2842-9
19. Ching I W, Brinson B E, Smalley R E, Margrave J L and Hauge R H 2001 J. Phys. Chem. B 105 1157-61